Home > Puma (Tdci) > Output shaft - updated genuine or Ashcroft? |
|
|
ashtrans Site Sponsor Member Since: 08 Nov 2008 Location: Harpenden Posts: 258 |
the whine is likely to be the transfer case gears, not shaft related, Dave
|
||
8th Jan 2019 1:21pm |
|
deaallen Member Since: 15 Feb 2016 Location: Basingstoke Posts: 264 |
is there typically any warning before the shaft fails, apart from seeping rust?
|
||
8th Jan 2019 1:23pm |
|
WindyJ Member Since: 18 Oct 2018 Location: France Posts: 190 |
Dave, good to have your input on a detailed post. Appreciated. Is there a way I can tell which version of your kit I have? It’s new in it’s box with the nylon straps still on even. Purchases sometime 10/16 - 05/18 when the previous owner had the Defender. Please also tell me it’s easy to fit |
||
8th Jan 2019 2:30pm |
|
ashtrans Site Sponsor Member Since: 08 Nov 2008 Location: Harpenden Posts: 258 |
Hi,
yes, pls send me a photo of the kit, Dave Dave |
||
8th Jan 2019 3:52pm |
|
WindyJ Member Since: 18 Oct 2018 Location: France Posts: 190 |
Cool...pm’d it to you.
|
||
8th Jan 2019 4:15pm |
|
ozy013 Member Since: 10 Feb 2014 Location: Melbourne Posts: 105 |
Nope, no warning, just total loss of drive.....that's why I fitted Ashcrofts about 3 years ago, I do alot of solo offroading in the Victorian High Country here in Oz. I just wanted it fitted for piece of mind. The genuine one that we pulled out wasn't far off from failing. |
||
8th Jan 2019 5:13pm |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8058 |
Its really easy to fit Once the gbox is out! Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
8th Jan 2019 5:41pm |
|
BogMonster Member Since: 05 Feb 2008 Location: Stanley Posts: 400 |
Yep, that's why I have just had one of your shafts fitted. Unfortunately as the original shaft was not in bad condition it hasn't made much impact on the bag of bolts that is the gearchange, but I can now tick off one thing that won't break 20 miles from a road and leave a bloody long walk home, or worse! Land Rover's corporate inability to build even relatively basic things straight and working never ceases to amaze me. --- 2006 Defender 110 SW 300Tdi • 2011 Ford Ranger XLT crewcab • 2015 Defender 110 Station Wagon Utility TDCi |
||
8th Jan 2019 7:27pm |
|
DSC-off Member Since: 16 Oct 2014 Location: North East Posts: 1428 |
"There has been lots of debate in the past as to what models and years wear, I this the model and year are irrelevant as it depends were you fall in the tolerance range, some never fail ie these have minimal error, some fail every 25K, these would be way out."
That was the result of our own forum survey last year. Many repeated failures at the same interval, often as low as 25k miles, while some do indeed go on forever. The survey also revealed that any year or model can be affected. Early failures of 2015 MY vehicles show that the Landrover Paste solution didn't fix it, or seemingly make any improvement! https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic62521-60.html Thinking about it, there's much more chance of 3 castings in the driveline having misalignment than just 2 castings. Adding an adapter between the gearbox and transfer box has 3 times more fit/machining conditions to consider. My bet would be it's the adapter casting that's causing the issue. Imagine the conversation, "Yeah, we just need a cheap casting to join these gearboxes together for a few years..." |
||
8th Jan 2019 8:18pm |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 498 |
Ashcroft uses a genuine Land Rover part for the kit. Therefore Ashcroft shafts are as good as genuine parts or even better (if you consider the lubrification). My shaft failed while downhilling in the Alpes. Fortunately I did not need not an engine break on loose ground. Land Rover refused a refund and just hide. The car has only 6 years. Land Rover product quality / marketing / customer care is rubbish. Let's wait and see if this changes with the new Defender ::: |
||
8th Jan 2019 9:53pm |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17450 |
Apparently the optional "Heritage Pack" for the new Defender will include fast-wearing drive flanges and an adaptor shaft failure simulator, as well as clunky wipers and sundry leaks and rattles. It will be an extra cost factory option aimed at the grumpy old man sector.
|
||
8th Jan 2019 10:35pm |
|
hornet Member Since: 04 Jan 2010 Location: Western Europe Posts: 361 |
But that can be explained now. Since there is no trivial solution for the two badly aligned aggregates, the expense for LR would have been catastrophic from a financial point of view. Stay still and sit out -- It worked! |
||
9th Jan 2019 11:30am |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17450 |
I don't agree that there was no trivial solution! Since this problem manifested itself sometime in late 2007 when there were still nine years of production to come, it would have been very trivial to tighten the manufacturing spec for the adaptor housing, assuming that this is indeed the part which is culpable*. It might have increased the unit cost somewhat, but not by a significant amount when the overall ex-works cost is considered.
I think it is likely that JLR figured that (say) one vehicle in every thousand came back for this repair under warranty and that it made more economic sense to fix that one per thousand and let the owners cover the costs of the others. If people had started dying because of this fault, it would have been a difference story. I am not personally aware of anyone (yet) being involved in a crash as a result of the adaptor shaft failing, although it could well happen. I suspect that the axle defect would have been treated in exactly the same way if it wasn't for the more readily apparent seriousness of your front hub breaking off. Even the TSB for this deprecatingly says that if the hub brakes off the driver may experience "a reduction in steering control" or some very similar wording. I would have been more inclined to say that the driver would experince a short period of terror and helplessness followed by a crash and possible injury or death. I believe that there have been a number of accidents as a result of this defect, so the "do nothing" approach may not have been an option. * Given that both the MT82 gearbox and the LT230 transfer box have been in production for a long time, apparently without any dimensional issues, it does seem likely to me that it is the adaptor housing which is the major part of the problem. it would be very interesting to compare the dimensions of one from a shaft-eating vehicle and one from a non-shaft-eater. |
||
9th Jan 2019 2:30pm |
|
shropshiredefender Member Since: 05 Jun 2017 Location: Shropshire Posts: 834 |
Finally a reason to order the new "Defender" |
||
9th Jan 2019 4:51pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis