↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > How to deal with hunt sabs, shame it involved a Land Rover
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
Print this entire topic · 
Cupboard



Member Since: 21 Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2971

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 HT Corris Grey
davidwhittaker wrote:
Yep. If an activity is legal, it should be ILLEGAL to intentionally and repeatedly disrupt it.


As I understand it, the hunting legislation is so full of holes that it's pretty hard to do it illegally unless you're trying. Bring an eagle owl along and oh look, that's fine now. No idea if an eagle owl can actually bring down a fox or if they've got any idea what's going on but y'know. I hate seeing suffering animals, and that's why I support hunting and will quite happily stomp on the head of a rat.
Post #515856 18th Mar 2016 8:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Projectblue



Member Since: 22 Nov 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 1096

England 
Hunt sabs just p**s me off. And I'm anti hunt.

When I moved to Devon I got some flack from denying the hunt the right to cross my land. I did it not because I wanted to disrupt, but because we began keeping sheep and 50 horses piling through your field does nothing for the ground.

But the people who go out to sabotage are the worst offenders in my book. Anyone who turns up with a mask on to remonstrate is not a peaceful protestor. They should be seen as inciting violence or intimidation and be treated as such. Either arrested or, more bluntly shown the error of their ways.

I don't want to spark an argument for or against Badger cull. Suffice to say I am against. The point being is I'm at a dinner party where this guy who is contracted by the Govt to do the cull tells of being chased by 3 masked men in a 4x4 who blocked the road, chased him when he turned around. He had to call the Police and drive to a local nick. The guy was 65. He was gainfully and legally employed - and he is threatened by masked men. Personally I'd have shot their windscreen out. And that's not bravado - that's working on I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6. New project and it's green: www.projectoverland.info
Post #515857 18th Mar 2016 8:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
apt100



Member Since: 05 Mar 2015
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1547

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green
^^^^ slightly off topic, but mention of shooting out a windscreen reminds me of this story from a while ago.... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-28...-tsar.html

Last edited by apt100 on 18th Mar 2016 9:07pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #515860 18th Mar 2016 9:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cheshire110



Member Since: 26 Jul 2013
Location: Cheshire/London
Posts: 2755

United Kingdom 
Cupboard wrote:
davidwhittaker wrote:
Yep. If an activity is legal, it should be ILLEGAL to intentionally and repeatedly disrupt it.


As I understand it, the hunting legislation is so full of holes that it's pretty hard to do it illegally unless you're trying. Bring an eagle owl along and oh look, that's fine now. No idea if an eagle owl can actually bring down a fox or if they've got any idea what's going on but y'know. I hate seeing suffering animals, and that's why I support hunting and will quite happily stomp on the head of a rat.


Exactly, needs to just be properly legalised and regulated (ie. Aligned with Scottish regulations). The dodgy hunts out there (there are definitely a few) and the sabs are both as damaging as each other. Cheers, David
Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8.
Post #515861 18th Mar 2016 9:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cupboard



Member Since: 21 Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2971

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 HT Corris Grey
leeds wrote:
gilarion wrote:
leeds wrote:
A collision between two vehicles off the public highway


Was it just a collision though, .......




Now if that farmer had seen that video of the huntsman being attacked by a masked hunt saboteur, had his family been threaten?

Did he believe his family was in danger? If I thought my family was in danger, YES I would ram a vehicle off the road IF I thought it would protect my family.

As I said that video is a snap shot off a very small portion of that days event. Without a lot more information I will not judge that farmer

Why did the police not take action? Not in the public interest? Maybe they are aware of a lot more background information. then we are.


Brendan


Given that the video was released by people opposed to the farmer's actions one can only imagine that it's the worst the farmer did and/or the best of the Land Rover driver's behavior.

Anyway.

I originally posted the video because I thought it was quite funny, if you ignore the backgrounds of the people driving and all the politics that get tied up in it, some plonkers overtake on a blind bend and end up in a ditch. People in ditch get all angry then a bloke in a tractor gives them a bit of a nudge and drives off. Then they post a video online showing their driving skills and ask for donations to fix the Landy they drove in to a ditch on a private track they shouldn't have been on. Cue a chuckling Cupboard (now there's a strange mental image for you!)
Post #515865 18th Mar 2016 9:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
Don't forget that to add to the chuckle factor is that they posted the video on a Land Rover enthusiasts group on farcebook expecting donations for their cause Whistle
Post #515877 18th Mar 2016 9:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Projectblue wrote:
They should be seen as inciting violence or intimidation and be treated as such. Either arrested or, more bluntly shown the error of their ways.

Personally I'd have shot their windscreen out.


You appear to be arguing the two opposite views at the same time Confused
Post #515893 18th Mar 2016 10:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Projectblue



Member Since: 22 Nov 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 1096

England 
In what way? I probably didn't write it very well. New project and it's green: www.projectoverland.info
Post #515978 19th Mar 2016 2:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Happyoldgit



Member Since: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 3471

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Corris Grey
There will always be a huge gulf between the pro and anti field-sports factions. I have my views on the issues but, speaking as one with first hand experience of some of them, I do not feel the need to get involved in a debate on here because in reality there is really very little, if anything, new to say.

While I respect the right of everyone to express their views in an appropriate manner and arena one or two of the comments in this thread leave a bit to be desired. Steve.
Owned numerous Land Rover vehicles of all shapes and sizes over the decades.
Current Defender: A non tarts hand-bagged Puma 110 XS USW.

[Insert something impressive here such as extensive list of previous Land Rovers or examples of your prestigeous and expensive items, trinkets, houses, bikes, vehicles etc]

http://forums.lr4x4.com

I used to be Miserable ...but now I'm ecstatic.
Post #515990 19th Mar 2016 4:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landy-Novice



Member Since: 22 Jun 2013
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 118

United Kingdom 
sigh. forget people today get so offended by the internet and take is so serious. depressing.

Last edited by Landy-Novice on 19th Mar 2016 9:57pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #516047 19th Mar 2016 8:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20367

United Kingdom 
Happyoldgit wrote:

While I respect the right of everyone to express their views in an appropriate manner and arena one or two of the comments in this thread leave a bit to be desired.


Well said, in my view if they keep it legal then it's fine I wouldn't be against it. (Drag)
One does wonder just if it is kept that way though....!

The above comment (post above not your's HOG) say's a lot about some of the pro mentality. (Especially the last sentence.)
Animal cruelty is mentioned and supported and mentioning battering humans would be okay too...

Last year there was one hunt up north somewhere filmed doing it illegally.
Recently Belvoir estate staff were filmed "keeping a fox in a shed / pill box."
The statement given as to the reason was. "The estate was acting in good intentions, and doesn't believe it has done anything wrong."

A local farmer to me had cattle injured and ran into fences a few years back, not to mention trespassing with no permission.

There was also in the last few weeks pro hunt masked so called men on quads that attacked and hospitalised two hunt monitors. One of which was an ex police officer.

If it's legal drag hunting then yes, hunt sabs shouldn't interphere.
But equally the hunt monitors shouldn't be interphered with by random pro people in or on vehicles? If it's legal no one has anything to worry about and there should be no reason for any stupid behaviour.

One does imagine that these blood thirsty pros would also support the latest episode of cutting money for disabled people too. But that's a different story all together.

Live and let live, we all breathe the same air!
As HOG has mentioned I shall not be passing further comment either after this.
Post #516065 19th Mar 2016 9:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cheshire110



Member Since: 26 Jul 2013
Location: Cheshire/London
Posts: 2755

United Kingdom 
Everyone involved in Hunts up and down the country (that I've spoken to, anyway) couldn't condemn illegal and disgusting practices of a small number enough. The reflects badly on everyone, just as rogue 4x4 idiots reflect badly on responsible green laners and 4x4 owners in general.

Please can we stop these references to "bloodthirsty", "perverted" etc. as those using them refer only to a very small minority, yet use them to tarnish the wider community. (The definition of prejudice) Cheers, David
Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8.
Post #516100 19th Mar 2016 11:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
Good points there David, I have been involved with hunting with hounds pretty much all my life due mainly from my father being passionate about hunting. Granted I'm not so involved nowadays but pretty much all the people I have come across share the same ideals about respect for all the animals involved. A true sportsman will respectfully walk away when he has been "bettered". Those who have not shown respect are not welcome.
A fair analogy of the minority who spoil it for everyone else is with Greenlaning. Whilst we are doing our best to follow the law there are allways a minority who think they are above the law and willfully drive wherever they like, it's those that receive the publics attention and who give us all a bad name.
Post #516109 20th Mar 2016 1:03am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
mick wrote:
Let the country folk look after it and let the office wallys stay in there cosy office


That works as long as you don't come into the towns to use the shops, hospitals, etc...
Post #516166 20th Mar 2016 11:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Lambley



Member Since: 20 Apr 2013
Location: Mid Devon
Posts: 1435

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 90 Td5 HT Java Black
I'm not for hunting but not against it either, but hunting for no reason turns my stomach.

Can I just ask a question with peoples opinions?

I was having a bonfire late on Friday, from a distance of probably 500 metres or so I spotted a vehicles headlights on at around 9.30pm, in the dark they drove around and stopped at the top of a bank on some wasteland, then I saw them get out and chuck something out of the vehicle and drive away.

The next night I was walking my dogs, they went straight to where they'd been, there were 3 young deer laying on the bank, obviously shot or killed by dogs.

I felt very sad and can't get it out of my mind.

Is that normal, legal or even ethical?
Why would somebody want to kill something so beautiful? I can understand fox hunting to a degree, I've got chickens and sheep, but I don't understand mindless killing or slaughter, I could understand if it was for the meat or something but to shoot animals and then just dump their bodies ??? Sad and mindless.
Post #516194 20th Mar 2016 4:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums