↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Output shaft failure, Forum Survey
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 21 of 33 <123 ... 202122 ... 313233>
Print this entire topic · 
keith



Member Since: 15 Aug 2012
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2211

Scotland 
It is unbelievable but as Cat says, “how many times are we meant to do this job before we wake-up and put the auto box in? Because if we don’t then you’d might as well sell the car straight after the repair.
Post #936046 2nd Jan 2022 6:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6298

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
not a great thought but.......if the shaft has gone again does that suggest the splines have worn leaving metalic 'shrapnel' now floating around the gearbox Question

in which case you may be a worse place than you were last time.

not trying to make matters worse and I guess really we need to wait for it to be stripped down but I'm sure you're right in diagnosing the problem. Sheep

I hope you're still able to have fun while awaiting repair etc. Thumbs Up
Post #936050 2nd Jan 2022 7:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
keith



Member Since: 15 Aug 2012
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2211

Scotland 
Yep having fun thanks. Left home in a 110 and arrived in this.



Click image to enlarge




Click image to enlarge


Last edited by keith on 2nd Jan 2022 8:21pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #936054 2nd Jan 2022 8:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17337

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
It would be almost impossible for debris from any of the normal failure modes to get inside either gearbox, one small mercy.
Post #936055 2nd Jan 2022 8:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5804

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
keith wrote:
Yep having fun thanks. Left home in a 110 and arrived in this.



Click image to enlarge




Click image to enlarge


When my OS went whilst on holiday in Palma I left home in this:


Click image to enlarge



And was given this…… Whistle


Click image to enlarge


We had two bike boxes and full cycling gear and there were no hire cars big enough to carry all our gear. Mrs Grenadier loved turning up at the hotels we’d booked in that. Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #936056 2nd Jan 2022 8:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5804

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
keith wrote:
It is unbelievable but as Cat says, “how many times are we meant to do this job before we wake-up and put the auto box in? Because if we don’t then you’d might as well sell the car straight after the repair.


A lot of people on here far more knowledgeable than I have mentioned the angle of the engine, gearbox and transfer case. Do we think that with the famously slack QC of Defender builds and the wider than acceptable tolerances, means that the reason some fail and some don’t is not so much that the parts are weak, but that they’re weak and then also badly put together? So even with an Ashcroft shaft replacement, if the whole linear configuration is particularly bad for a given individual vehicle, such as yours, it’s destined to fail no matter how much lube you put on the OE part, or whether you ‘upgrade’ it? I’ve just had my second failure, 40k on an OE part, but my trans case bushes had failed. Could even a couple of mil drop add extra stresses? Just a thought? Is everything in your driveline tight? Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #936059 2nd Jan 2022 8:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
htb2



Member Since: 02 Nov 2018
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 524

Wales 
keith wrote:
Yep having fun thanks. Left home in a 110 and arrived in this.



Click image to enlarge




Click image to enlarge


Good old autoservices, bunch of shysters, recovery was good but workshop manager was hopeless and workshop were incompetent. all they had to do was replace a fractured kunifer brake pipe, had to replace all pipes myself when home.
Post #936061 2nd Jan 2022 8:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Westy



Member Since: 28 Sep 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11

2011
2.4tdci
90 Pickup
74000 miles original shaft
No Issues (touch wood)
I have a LOF clutch and LOF one piece shaft sitting ready just in case.
Post #936063 2nd Jan 2022 8:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3670

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
Grenadier wrote:
keith wrote:
It is unbelievable but as Cat says, “how many times are we meant to do this job before we wake-up and put the auto box in? Because if we don’t then you’d might as well sell the car straight after the repair.


A lot of people on here far more knowledgeable than I have mentioned the angle of the engine, gearbox and transfer case. Do we think that with the famously slack QC of Defender builds and the wider than acceptable tolerances, means that the reason some fail and some don’t is not so much that the parts are weak, but that they’re weak and then also badly put together? So even with an Ashcroft shaft replacement, if the whole linear configuration is particularly bad for a given individual vehicle, such as yours, it’s destined to fail no matter how much lube you put on the OE part, or whether you ‘upgrade’ it? I’ve just had my second failure, 40k on an OE part, but my trans case bushes had failed. Could even a couple of mil drop add extra stresses? Just a thought? Is everything in your driveline tight?


I think this is exactly the problem. For Keith to go through so many and others to go through none would suggest that there is nothing wrong with the component itself, but it is being installed into a misaligned system. The difficult is in finding the culprit of the misalignment, be it either gear box output face, the transfer box adaptor or the transfer box itself. I would start by checking that both faces of the transfer box adaptor are parallel. Gloucester Nige has some good vids on it on his YouTube channel.

The fact that the shaft is two piece is to allow for a level of misalignment in tolerances, otherwise a solid shaft would just move the weak point elsewhere, but there is only so much it will be able to cope with.
Post #936073 3rd Jan 2022 6:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17337

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Co1 wrote:
...The fact that the shaft is two piece is to allow for a level of misalignment in tolerances, otherwise a solid shaft would just move the weak point elsewhere, but there is only so much it will be able to cope with.


No, it is a conventional and inexpensive (and usually satisfactory) engineering approach to extending a shaft of this type in a manner which involves the minimum modifications to existing components. It allows for negligible misalignment, and we are all aware of what happens when there is misalignment - chronic wear, fretting, the parts separating, all leading to complete failure.

A design intended to allow for misalignment would of necessity be very different.

In many ways the standard design is more satisfactory than the one-piece alternative with its long thing through-bolt. It would be interesting to fit a LOF shaft in Keith's vehicle and run it for 20k miles to see what happens, my expectation would be a failure of the MT82 output splines or rear mainshaft bearing.

I remain convinced that the root cause is a design which allows a manufacturer tolerance or QA problem. I think the likely suspect is the adaptor housing since the number of fault-free MT82 and LT230 gearbox in other applications suggest maturity.
Post #936081 3rd Jan 2022 9:12am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Co1



Member Since: 19 Aug 2018
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3670

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Loire Blue
It’s a valid point Blackwolf.

Keith: I think it’s well worth having the adaptor housing skimmed to ensure it is parallel. Would be very interested to see if it is out or not.
Post #936082 3rd Jan 2022 9:36am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6298

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
blackwolf wrote:
It would be almost impossible for debris from any of the normal failure modes to get inside either gearbox, one small mercy.


Confused
doesn't the ashcroft thingy effectively extend the gearbox casing to include the adapter shaft coupling ie gearbox and adapter use the same oil?
Post #936090 3rd Jan 2022 10:17am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6298

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Co1 wrote:
It’s a valid point Blackwolf.

Keith: I think it’s well worth having the adaptor housing skimmed to ensure it is parallel. Would be very interested to see if it is out or not.


I agree to a point. the faces would need to be parallel but also the location of bolts would need to be spot on too, to ensure the shaft is straight.

I'm not suggesting this is practical but I guess the shaft would ideally have two UJ's to allow for alignment is be made of rubber Big Cry
Post #936091 3rd Jan 2022 10:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
Caterham wrote:
blackwolf wrote:
It would be almost impossible for debris from any of the normal failure modes to get inside either gearbox, one small mercy.


Confused
doesn't the ashcroft thingy effectively extend the gearbox casing to include the adapter shaft coupling ie gearbox and adapter use the same oil?

The Ashcroft 'thingy' is essentially a standard shaft that's drilled to allow lubrication by the gearbox oil. It doesn't alter the gearbox itself in any way. Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia
Post #936094 3rd Jan 2022 10:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6298

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
I appreciate it doesn't change the gearbox but if the gearbox oil can get to the shaft does that not mean the corrosion/debris from the shaft can make its way back to the gearbox?
Post #936096 3rd Jan 2022 10:51am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 21 of 33 <123 ... 202122 ... 313233>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums