Home > Puma (Tdci) > Proof of 2.2 being fitted in 2012 |
|
|
iruffell Member Since: 03 Sep 2010 Location: Marlow, Buckinghamshire Posts: 343 |
From Wikipedia, seems there is more than one 2.2;
2.2 In 2005, Ford introduced the Duratorq ZSD-422, a 2.2 L (2184 cc) turbodiesel for top-of-the-range versions of the Mondeo and Jaguar X-Type which produced 155 PS (153 hp/114 kW). This is unrelated to the PSA DW12 2.2 unit used in Peugeot and Citroën applications. Applications: Ford Transit 2005–2007 Ford Mondeo 2.2 TDCi 155, 155 PS (153 hp/114 kW) and 262 ft·lbf (355N·m) 2005–Present Jaguar X-Type 2.4 The 2,402 cc (2.402 L; 146.6 cu in) Duratorq ZSD-424 is a turbocharged and intercooled Diesel. Output is 75 PS (55 kW; 74 hp) to 137 PS (101 kW; 135 hp) and 185 N·m (136 lb·ft) to 285 N·m (210 lb·ft). Applications: Ford Transit 2002-2006 LDV Convoy 2002 London Taxi TXII 2007-onward Land Rover Defender It's probably this one; 2.2 Based on the PSA DW12 engine[citation needed] and with a capacity of 2179 cc, this engine was released in April 2008 by Ford in the Mk IV Mondeo, soon following in the Ford S-Max and Ford Galaxy. It has been engineered by Ford in England, as described the fourth phase of the joint-venture agreement with PSA. Dagenham is the place of manufacture. It features a 16-valve cylinder head with twin belt driven camshafts and utilises a variable geometry turbocharger with overboost function, rather than the twin turbo approach of Peugeot and Citroen. The result is a very respectable 175 PS (172 hp/129 kW) complete with 295 ft·lbf (400 N·m) of torque, although 310 ft·lbf (420 N·m) is temporarily available thanks to the transient overboost function. In 2010 Ford and PSA revised the engine with a new turbocharger and a new power output of 200 PS with a torque of 420 N·m and even 450 N·m at overboost conditions while the emissions are at Euro 5 level. |
||
19th May 2011 8:28am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4636 |
And here was I thinking that this discussion was at an end! 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
19th May 2011 8:46am |
|
Naks Member Since: 27 Jan 2009 Location: Stellenbosch, ZA Posts: 2632 |
I'd hurry & get the 2.4. Any engineer will tell you: extracting more power from a smaller engine will only result in more stress, leading to an early failure. You Europeans and your stupid emissions regulations -- 2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear 2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9 Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ |
||
19th May 2011 8:57am |
|
Sonic3d Member Since: 28 Jan 2008 Location: Ross on Wye Posts: 1505 |
Couldn`t agree more with you on that There ain`t not substitute for cubic capacity The Defender keeps getting smaller engines while the rest of the range gets better engines and gearboxes |
||
19th May 2011 9:43am |
|
gazellio Member Since: 28 Apr 2011 Location: chilterns Posts: 108 |
Definite sign they are thinking of ditching/replacing it......
|
||
19th May 2011 9:54am |
|
Naks Member Since: 27 Jan 2009 Location: Stellenbosch, ZA Posts: 2632 |
Well, in some countries you can still get the Defender with the 300TDi engine. AFAIK Otokar, the Turkish arms manufacturer, makes them under license from LR. -- 2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear 2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9 Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ |
||
19th May 2011 9:59am |
|
discocuzzy Member Since: 16 Jul 2008 Location: surrey Posts: 1200 |
God im missing that Puma engine and gearbox.......used to look forward to the sound of emptying a bag of spanners over the drive on start up, then as she settled down to idle sounding like a T34 tank, i would slip the precision gear selector into 1st and power off into the sunset............
With my latest LR product...the D4 "Miami Vice"..3.0ltr twin turbo V6 mated to a silky smooth 6 speed auto 245bhp on tap and enough torque to pull the all of the spice girls pants off (mel b is a trollope so she dont count) I really thought i would miss the 110.........................unfortunately i dont Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge Its got a great secret compartment as well to assist with stealthy drug dealing You cannot teach stupid people to do clever things |
||
19th May 2011 10:06am |
|
Sonic3d Member Since: 28 Jan 2008 Location: Ross on Wye Posts: 1505 |
Couldn`t of put it better myself
|
||
19th May 2011 10:27am |
|
RED-DOT Member Since: 29 Jun 2009 Location: stirling Posts: 2363 |
I agree with my old mate that the Defender is getting left behind and for a 60 year old design it is certainly grasping its hold on the past. Only a fortnight from my 3rd handbrake recall it won't hold on a slope. Paint bubbling up on the rear quarter panel too... Bloody ridiculous for a £33,000 car at 3 years old... I am going down the D4 Commercial route now. 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
|
||
19th May 2011 10:39am |
|
Sonic3d Member Since: 28 Jan 2008 Location: Ross on Wye Posts: 1505 |
Its makes sense for the same money as a 110XS you can have the D4 Commercial
|
||
19th May 2011 10:42am |
|
RED-DOT Member Since: 29 Jun 2009 Location: stirling Posts: 2363 |
Discovery 4 commercial. Full Stornoway grey, commercial pack, bum warmers, colour coded wing guards..£33k OTR. 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
|
||
19th May 2011 10:48am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4636 |
I can just see the ads for the Mitshsihakihooki now. "Land Rover 2.2, our latest 6.0,size does really matter."
I agree the regulations will kill off the Defender-just the exscuse Solihull need to ditch it and get something more economical to build. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
19th May 2011 10:53am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4636 |
Is the 130 dropped from the new range? If so is it down to low volumes not being economical or down to the 2.2 not being man enough for the fully laden 130? 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
19th May 2011 11:06am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4636 |
[quote="discocuzzy"]God im missing that Puma engine and gearbox.......used to look forward to the sound of emptying a bag of spanners over the drive on start up, then as she settled down to idle sounding like a T34 tank, i would slip the precision gear selector into 1st and power off into the sunset............
Sounds like you have been driving my series 111 diesel. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
19th May 2011 11:08am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis