Home > Puma (Tdci) > Proof of 2.2 being fitted in 2012 |
|
|
Landie Boy Member Since: 14 Jan 2011 Location: Essex Posts: 431 |
Taken this straight from topix, it is the only engine avaliable... We are also losing the ability to buy it in 3 forms; CREW CAB 4 DR, CREW CAB HCPU 4 DR and PICK UP 2DR. I suggest if you want one of those 3 get it now
Click image to enlarge Jack |
||
18th May 2011 7:36pm |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4636 |
and that seems to be that.....Well spotted. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
18th May 2011 7:42pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6295 |
i was right after all.
seems I was given the right info many many moons ago! question is should I have waited? will it be a step in the right direction, a backwards step or simply different? |
||
18th May 2011 8:08pm |
|
pom Member Since: 01 Jun 2010 Location: Worcester Posts: 1343 |
fingers crossed for an auto as well.
|
||
18th May 2011 8:10pm |
|
110SEB Member Since: 29 Jan 2009 Location: Essex, England Posts: 1444 |
Guys, forgive me, but what is 'topix'?
|
||
18th May 2011 8:11pm |
|
Landie Boy Member Since: 14 Jan 2011 Location: Essex Posts: 431 |
It is a service from land rover for dealer, I would recommend that you check it out. It's free if you want basic Information like the ability to find your vehicle with it's vin, see recalls etc.... You can also see fitting instructions for assesories. Hope that helped Jack |
||
18th May 2011 8:19pm |
|
Landie Boy Member Since: 14 Jan 2011 Location: Essex Posts: 431 |
At the moment it says it uses the exsisting box Jack |
||
18th May 2011 8:22pm |
|
Zagato Site Supporter Member Since: 08 Jan 2011 Location: Billingshurst West Sussex Posts: 5012 |
Why the change to the 2.2 Litre?
|
||
18th May 2011 9:00pm |
|
Landie Boy Member Since: 14 Jan 2011 Location: Essex Posts: 431 |
emissions and stuff like that.... Jack |
||
18th May 2011 9:13pm |
|
dgardel Member Since: 30 Nov 2008 Location: Veneto (Heart & Head) Posts: 3586 |
Ford costs reduction. the 2.2 and 2.4 ARE THE SAME motors (only the stroke is different)..... On transit too they will use only the 2.2L so LESS PARTS TO MANAGE 2.4 will use on Ranger (bring to 2.5L) Discovery 5 td6 HSE Stornoway Gray Outback Engineering Limited Edition IID Pro MV License |
||
19th May 2011 7:16am |
|
mrandmrsh Member Since: 31 May 2010 Location: Huddersfield Posts: 692 |
So someone who wants to buy a new Defender now needs to either get in quick to try and secure a 2.4 or hang back a few weeks to get the 2.2 depending on views on the relative merits and demerits of the engines.
I assume Defenders will keep their N1 status (commercial vehicle) in the uk regardless (although I am only really concerned about the Utility Wagon TBH). Cheers C |
||
19th May 2011 8:06am |
|
dgardel Member Since: 30 Nov 2008 Location: Veneto (Heart & Head) Posts: 3586 |
2.4L also is EU5 with DPF (see here in italy on transit 140CV), but for the EU emission rate we see the engine - vehicle system, not the only engine stand alone. The Defender is more heavy respect the Transit ...... The problem is: Ford for engine assembly line optimization reasons will provide only the 2.2L and the volume of the Defender production (and London taxis) is too small for maintain the 2.4 prod. line alive..... But 2.4 output capabilities are stronger than 2.2 (transit AWD -2011MY is provided only with the 2.4). Discovery 5 td6 HSE Stornoway Gray Outback Engineering Limited Edition IID Pro MV License |
||
19th May 2011 8:15am |
|
dgardel Member Since: 30 Nov 2008 Location: Veneto (Heart & Head) Posts: 3586 |
Anyway, the engine is the same and the differences will be so little that the Defender will not change character....
this is the new 2.2L Click image to enlarge Discovery 5 td6 HSE Stornoway Gray Outback Engineering Limited Edition IID Pro MV License |
||
19th May 2011 8:17am |
|
gazellio Member Since: 28 Apr 2011 Location: chilterns Posts: 108 |
122 bhp is not a lot compared to the other models in the LR range. Is it enough to cope with heavy loads and long hills etc? What is the torque difference?
|
||
19th May 2011 8:24am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis