Home > Puma (Tdci) > TDCi Mpg's |
|
|
CFB Member Since: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire Posts: 803 |
On standard tyres surely it is more accurate Oversized tyres will throw it for sure. Andy |
||
15th Jul 2008 10:24am |
|
mrwoo Member Since: 03 Jan 2008 Location: Cheshire Posts: 286 |
Just filled up this morning, only reading 352 on the odometer and just under 1/4 of a tank left.
I put exactly 48.27 litres in as I have the receipt in front of me... 48.27 / 4.54 = 10.63 gallons 352 / 10.63 = 33.1 MPG Rich... ps vehicles done 21k if that helps |
||
15th Jul 2008 11:17am |
|
CFB Member Since: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire Posts: 803 |
If I can get that, or close I will be very happy indeed. Andy |
||
15th Jul 2008 12:56pm |
|
mrwoo Member Since: 03 Jan 2008 Location: Cheshire Posts: 286 |
The biggest saving for me (like with most vehicles) was changing my driving style so that I accelerated gently and changing up at around 2>2.2k rpm's. I spend most of my time around 55mph on A roads but I do go up to 70 on motorways. Another thing that I haven't mentioned before on this thread anyway is that a use fully synthetic oil, a version that is supposed to be good for fuel efficiency and meets all of fords requirements.
http://www.opieoils.co.uk/p-991-fuchs-tita...e-oil.aspx |
||
15th Jul 2008 3:21pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5038 |
There is always 2 schools of thought with this - one keep the revs high and two keep the revs low. Smooth is about the only common sense one. ALthough i dont care much...dare i say give me my fuel before it all runs out Anyway back to MPG i use this site http://www.robinwhite.fsnet.co.uk/conv/mpg.htm and i know that it returns me around about 27mpg for my fueling and driving with all the kit on. I like the measuring technique of fill up and measure miles then refill problem is this: 1) you never put the same amount in 2) when you put just a little in and refill your mpg will go up! on point 2 i have done this on our 4 cars and if i fill up do about 50 - 100 miles refill and measure the mpgs are really high, especially the lower miles you have done Mike |
||
15th Jul 2008 4:54pm |
|
Ads90 Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds Posts: 812 |
This is true, but the point is that over 1000s of miles it will give you quite an accurate average. I.e. if after 10 fill-ups, you have put in a total of 470-odd litres (fill-to-fill) and recorded 3000-odd miles, the initial re-fueling innaccuracy will be negligable. So you keep track of all miles & all litres. |
||
15th Jul 2008 5:13pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5038 |
I agree - i use this method, so have no complaints and when i want to fool myself into at 38mpg figure i wait until 20 miles and fill up Mike |
||
15th Jul 2008 5:20pm |
|
mrwoo Member Since: 03 Jan 2008 Location: Cheshire Posts: 286 |
I fill mine to 1" of the filler cap every time, so there must only be 200ml or so in it each time
|
||
15th Jul 2008 5:33pm |
|
Ads90 Member Since: 16 Jun 2008 Location: Cots-on-the-Wolds Posts: 812 |
This is the most accurate way (for a single reading) - although when I tried it, I ended up with diesel flavoured strides all day, so I don't any more! |
||
15th Jul 2008 6:20pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5038 |
Actually you may find you still arent Replace the cap - move it a little and open it - by then the air will have made space and your level will have changed Mike |
||
15th Jul 2008 6:38pm |
|
Nidge Member Since: 27 Jan 2008 Location: Kildare Ireland Posts: 819 |
Well my 110 Puma is back at the main Dealers having ABS/Etc. sensors replaced. They also found a faulty fuel switch, after much complaining that she was running rough sometimes. To be replaced under warranty also.
How much would the faulty fuel switch have effected my fuel consumption ? and anyone know where it is located ? Nidge. |
||
18th Jul 2008 7:24am |
|
TJ101 Member Since: 30 May 2007 Location: Taunton Somerset Posts: 3750 |
No idea ?? but will be interested to see if you notice any difference,, They keep telling me, their is nothing they can change/fix/adjust, to affect the fuel consumption California F1, 75th 110 "Kermit", 50th Ann V8, 90 V8 Hybrid, 55 Series 1 Main Brian James Trailer Dealer for South West UK |
||
18th Jul 2008 7:28am |
|
chalky Member Since: 09 May 2008 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 483 |
I,m regularly seeing 35+ MPG out of mine ! 90 CSW
I have just returned from a 4 day camping trip around the Dales and from empty to empty i got 285 miles from a tank full ! with a heavy laden trailer on the back ! I,ll fill her up tomorrow and see the official figures and keep a record for the tally ! will be some where in the twentys ? its the first time i have towed with this one and i did notice the consumption more ! The school of thought on the partial or heavy throttle is fatally flawed from my point of view ! I have a fast Audi and when its driven hard and at the same time smooth its MPG is shocking ! If i drive it conservatively it will return more than double the MPG. Same with the DEFENDER ! however i do drive the 90 with conservative ease and always use part throttle and never over rev the thing. I dare say if i was to up the anti then consumption would drop ! no matter how linear the delivery. I recently did the real world test from the Land rover magazine and using the Fill to brim conduct journey then fill to brim method i returned a very respectable figure ! better than the freelader 2 that they have tested. there is no way on earth i could have made that journey filled back up and got a figure of late 30s ! DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN |
||
19th Jul 2008 10:39pm |
|
Laurie Member Since: 22 Feb 2008 Location: Sussex, England Posts: 2897 |
I used to have a Jensen Intercepter and a 109" 2286cc petrol Station Wagon.
Both weighed in at 1 3/4 Tons Both did 17 mpg The Jensen did 0 - 60 in 6 secs and 155 mph - why didn't the Land Rover? |
||
20th Jul 2008 1:02am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis