↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > MOT emissions failure
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
MOT emissions failure
Help! I have a 60 plate 2.4 Puma 90. In the past year I have replaced injectors, EGR, turbo, fuel pump solenoid and fuel rail valve. It is driving like a dream and giving much improved fuel consumption but ........ It is failing it's MOT with a reading of between 2.00 and 2.25l/m. The exhaust is 'sooty' and when the MOT man revved the engine up for the test there was a small puff of black smoke. I have had a look at the intercooler hoses but can't see any splits. Any bright ideas?
Post #858977 30th Sep 2020 4:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20320

United Kingdom 
Use some Millers diesel additive and go elsewhere.
Whilst it might be still on the system, being a different place may well be very different.

The tester can have their own personal views and attitudes, and in that case are best avoided all together.

I had one once who refused to chat about a tyre and hid away leaving it the the HR desk which were useless as well.
Went elsewhere and had no problem at all.
Check and or replace the air filter, MAF & MAP sensors. The latter two can be cleaned.

Worth trying. ⭐️⭐️God Bless the USA 🇬🇧🇺🇸 ⭐️⭐️
Post #858980 30th Sep 2020 4:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
Many thanks for that. Between the first test and second retest I ran through 400ml of Forte injector cleaner and 400ml Forte diesel cleaner. The reading went from 2.03 to 2.25l/m. I put a new air filter in two months ago when I serviced it. I will try the sensors. Before I replaced all the parts listed, the engine light would come on occasionally, usually when accelerating onto a motorway. The fault was with the MAF sensor and disappeared for a while after clearing the fault code. I had forgotten about that so you could be onto something there. Many thanks again.
Post #858983 30th Sep 2020 4:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8018

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
I thought the limit was 3? Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #858984 30th Sep 2020 4:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
That was the limit for diesels with turbos pre 1 July 2008. After that the limit reduced to 1.5 (sadly).
Post #858987 30th Sep 2020 5:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
hank



Member Since: 12 Sep 2016
Location: South Wales
Posts: 2296

Wales 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
I'm really surprised at this. Mine passes with a straight through exhaust, decat, EGR blank and remap. 2007 though so different regs by the look of it. > 110 XS Double Cab
Post #858988 30th Sep 2020 5:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3414

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications...ssessments

But the DPF was only introduced on Defenders in 2012 with the introduction of the 2.2. Try to get the so called plate value, cause in its absence, the limit goes to 1.5 fior all except the earliest 2.4. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #859000 30th Sep 2020 6:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20320

United Kingdom 
I would replace the MAF in that case.

If you use the search function on here you should find a thread of mine regarding the MAF & MAP part numbers and suppliers.
It's not an overly expensive part if it is actual OEM, I wouldn't recommend LR Genuine due to price as it's the same part.
The parts I posted about was actually for 2.4's like mine so it's your lucky day. Laughing Thumbs Up

Assuming it is the culprit of course, but MAF's are critical to performance.
I replaced the MAP on mine as well at the time.

Massive difference in price between actual parts from the manufacturer to LR Gen. something like £170 more for LR items and it is the same part. ⭐️⭐️God Bless the USA 🇬🇧🇺🇸 ⭐️⭐️
Post #859003 30th Sep 2020 6:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
Jobs for tomorrow. Check the plate and have a look at the MAF sensor. Many thanks for all your help guys.
Post #859012 30th Sep 2020 7:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20320

United Kingdom 
Thumbs Up ⭐️⭐️God Bless the USA 🇬🇧🇺🇸 ⭐️⭐️
Post #859019 30th Sep 2020 7:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bian Considine



Member Since: 25 Jul 2020
Location: Margate
Posts: 53

United Kingdom 
I'll probably get shot down here but if you are using supermarket fuel try running a couple of tankful's of Shell or BP super diesel (whatever it's actually called).

Has been known to make a difference.
Post #859023 30th Sep 2020 7:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
It's a point. When I took it back for the retest having run through Forte diesel and injector cleaner, I filled up with some top grade shell diesel. Sadly the emission value increased from 2.03 to 2.25l/m. Felt deflated.
Post #859024 30th Sep 2020 8:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 479

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
Re: MOT emissions failure
KMBXXX wrote:
Help! The exhaust is 'sooty' and when the MOT man revved the engine up for the test there was a small puff of black smoke. I have had a look at the intercooler hoses but can't see any splits. Any bright ideas?


The hotter the engine, the better combustion ... if the system is clean...
Short distance trips are the worst thing for Diesel engines with EGR because the dirt from cold runs can never quit the system.
Perhaps high quality diesel performs a bit better than supermarket fuel if the engine's cold.Hope dies last.

So, benefit from a trip on the motorway in order to get the sooth out of the system. Clean EGR by hand if too much dirt.
Warm up your engine for 20...30 min just before MOT starts
Post #859042 30th Sep 2020 9:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 479

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
hank wrote:
I'm really surprised at this. Mine passes with a straight through exhaust, decat, EGR blank and remap. 2007 though so different regs by the look of it.


This is no surprise : EGR is for NOx reduction. However, EGR rises CO, HC and sooth for which you need a the cat and the DPF.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaust_gas_recirculation
You're gonna pass any MOT as long as the system isn't checked visually and NOx cannot be tested by their system Cool as a dirty old coward Laughing

The day NOx is tested you'll find yourself in the other category Confused


Last edited by Julie on 30th Sep 2020 10:01pm. Edited 2 times in total
Post #859043 30th Sep 2020 9:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
KMBXXX



Member Since: 25 Aug 2020
Location: Surrey
Posts: 8

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Santorini Black
For the retest I took it for a spin round the M25 then straight into the MOT garage where the man was waiting to do the test. He appeared to be on my side and was happy to let me stand by and watch. As I said before the reading worsened from 2.03 to 2.25l/m. What you say about hot engines does remind me of another issue. She runs like a dream with 91k on the clock but was a little bit wobbly (a couple of minor stutters at low speed) on two days when the temperature was in the 90's. I thought that strange because, as you rightly say, diesels run better when hot.
Post #859044 30th Sep 2020 9:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums