↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > MY2011/2012 Recall Action P047/048 Front Axle Case
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 25 of 39 <123 ... 242526 ... 373839>
Print this entire topic · 
Martin
Site Admin


Member Since: 02 Apr 2007
Location: Hook Norton
Posts: 6604

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Montalcino Red
mwestcrew wrote:
Can somebody help me with finding out if my VIN is affected?

VIN is SALLDKVS7BA82xxxx


I've plugged in into Topix for you, and there's no recall campaigns showing up for it.  1988 90 Td5 NAS soft top
2015 D90 XS SW
Post #1012868 27th Oct 2023 3:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17353

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Ianh wrote:
On page 10 of this topic member MarcoLauretano modified the brackets so they were bolted either side of the defective weld and hence , unlike the std LR solution, actually provided additional support to the weld and thus reduced, by what I expect is a reasonable amount, the likelihood of the failure.

So why did LR not make the brackets this way in the first place ? Instead of casting / machining the 3 large holes all they had to do is cast / machine 3 smaller diameter holes in the correct locations and supply 3 bolts and locking nuts. ...


I imagine that manufacturing tolerances in the axle would make it impossible to manufacture a single set of parts that would fit every axle, and the cost of a solution which had to be fettled by a skilled person to fit would be prohibitively expensive. I also question whether the modified bracket would actually prevent faulty axle from breaking, although it would certainly mask to a great extent the fact it had and by so doing might be more dangerous than the standard bracket.

Remember that these brackets do not and are not designed to fix the problem, they are merely intended to minimise the danger resulting from a failure and are designed so that it will still be apparent that a failure has occurred. Whilst as owners we may be angry that we have vehicles with potentially defect axle welds and we may be disgusted at LR's seemingly cavalier attitude, from a business and engineering perspective these brackets are a pragmatic solution. They're cheap enough to be fitted to all vehicles at risk, and they (probably) keep you and others safe if your axle fails. A reasonable approach provided you as the manufacturer can be sure that only a very small number of axles are likely to fail (I've heard of perhaps 20 in total so far). If an axle fails after the brackets are fitted, I sincerely hope LR will fit a new one free of charge.

Of course they should replace every axle case in the "at risk" range with a brand new one as a precaution, but that simply isn't going to happen. (They'd be more likely to buy the vehicle off you and run it through the "reborn" programm, then sell it for £200k).
Post #1012874 27th Oct 2023 3:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8010

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
Two of mine booked in a month or so ago for Monday/ Phone call 1737 today, fri night, sorry so no parts in will call you when they are in.......................................... Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #1012891 27th Oct 2023 6:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mwestcrew



Member Since: 09 Dec 2019
Location: South Warwickshire
Posts: 247

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 130 Puma 2.4 HCPU Baltic Blue
Martin wrote:
mwestcrew wrote:
Can somebody help me with finding out if my VIN is affected?

VIN is SALLDKVS7BA82xxxx


I've plugged in into Topix for you, and there's no recall campaigns showing up for it.



Thanks Martin. That’s a great help. 2011 130 Utility Body
2005 110 Van
Post #1012944 28th Oct 2023 7:34am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
PWD



Member Since: 30 Oct 2023
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 5

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Blenheim Silver
Axle Faiure Group Claim enquiry.
In 2018 I suffered an axle failure on my Defender X Tech. The NSF wheel came adrift due to the axle weld failure and I was left with no steering and no brakes. The 90 shot across the road and ploughed into a 6' high dry stone wall bending the chassis rails and writing the vehicle off. Luckily it was 6 AM on a very wet monday morning and nobody else was involved. The day before I had been towing my little 2 tonne excavator down a steep and winding road surrounded by primary school children on the pavement. If the failure had occured then I would have shot down a very steep incline, ironically through a graveyard, with my little Kubota on top of me, quite possibly taking a few youngsters with me. Only now do I understand it was a serial issue with a batch of axle casings ( I believe outsourced to India) which affected a much wider range of vehicles than JLR were prepared to acknowledge. I questioned my local LR agent (Stratstone) and was told in no uncertain terms that there was nothing they could do.
My insurance company (The NFU mutual) were brilliant and within about 10 days I was back on the road in an almost identical X Tech. Their claims engineer agreed that the accident had been caused by the axle failure. I stripped as many of the premium parts as I could from the old 90 and said my goodbye’s. I was fond of that motor as it was the TD5. Great for towing with bags of grunt.
About 2 weeks ago I received a recall for my 2012 X Tech and here I am. I’ve read a few forums and discovered that the recall parameters have been widened considerably and seen some other fairly unsettling stories about these axle failures and the way JLR have even allegedly offered people new vehicles to stay schtum.
I’ve been in touch with a well known solicitor who is currently compiling another case against JLR and he is very interested to hear of all the instances of axle failure or related incidents as well as the responses people have received from JLR about the problem. As I see it we are being misled about a safety critical component that is not fit for purpose.
Can anyone tell me if there have been any efforts to put together a group claim against JLR relating to the axle failures and would anybody be interested in assisting with information about axle failures and the related accidents?
Post #1013240 30th Oct 2023 6:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3410

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
PWD wrote:

Their claims engineer agreed that the accident had been caused by the axle failure. ........ I was fond of that motor as it was the TD5. Great for towing with bags of grunt.


Firstly good to hear that no one was injured in your case.
However, you mention that it was a Td5... Td5s were made up to 2006, and the axle weld defect only happened when JLR changed their axle case production process from friction weld to mig weld circa end 2010. So if your axle was original to the vehicle, it must had been an axle with friction welded swivel flanges.

Did you perhaps still have pictures of the failed axle that you can share online? 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #1013244 30th Oct 2023 6:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
PWD



Member Since: 30 Oct 2023
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 5

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Blenheim Silver
My mistake. It was not a TD5 but a 2.4L 90 H Top X Tech LE TD.
Here are some pics.

Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge
Post #1013245 30th Oct 2023 6:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3410

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
Holy Censored
But looking at the 2nd picture, it looks like the swivel housing bolts have failed, not the axle. You can see both the axle flange still attached to the axle, and part of the swivel flange can be seen in below pic.

I have never seen this failure before.



Click image to enlarge
 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #1013247 30th Oct 2023 6:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ianh



Member Since: 17 Sep 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 1990

United Kingdom 
I think his nearside weld broke and what you are seeing is the offside damage due to hitting the wall[/i]
Post #1013248 30th Oct 2023 7:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17353

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Re: Axle Faiure Group Claim enquiry.
PWD wrote:
... I believe outsourced to India ...


No, this is an Internet myth, LR has never outsourced axle production to India. The problem was introduced when a switch from friction-welding to MIG-welding took place within the UK, apparently due to the friction-welding machine being life-expired.

I am not aware that there has ever been a concerted effort to initiate any kind of group action since failures are relatively rare. More surprising perhaps is that no-one affected by this shambles brought it to the wider public attention either through social media or through national mainstream media. It is extraordinary how few people know about it.

Imagine if it happened to a celebrity, or, perish the though, resulted in multiple child fatalities.
Post #1013250 30th Oct 2023 7:03pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3410

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
That would make more sense Ianh. I did not think of that, and indeed is far more common for the nearside weld to fail for an unknown reason. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #1013251 30th Oct 2023 7:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
spudfan



Member Since: 10 Sep 2007
Location: Co Donegal
Posts: 4646

Ireland 
My 2011 had the magic brackets fitted some years ago. Recently I contacted our road safety crowd and the department of transport regarding this issue. I sent copies of the recall letters from here plus a full account of the fault and to why the magic brackets were fitted.
The dept of transport (I actually sent it to the minister in charge) in a reply from the said minister informed me that it had nothing to do with his department and that it was the Road Safety crowd who had jurisdiction. I thought I was getting some traction from the Road Safety Authority as I had emails asking for info etc. Now they did contact Land Rover Ireland on my behalf. The outcome? Well they told me that Land Rover Ireland informed them that there were no outstanding recalls regarding my vehicle.
This annoyed me as they failed to grasp the underlying issue namely the substandard axle wells and the potential danger there of.
I cannot understand how the authorities fail to see the importance of this issue or do they not want to grasp the nettle?
PAYNEY1000 has had some success after his long drawn out battle in France but Land Rover seem to be ignoring the outcome of the ruling by the EU that the axles have to be replaced. I think this sudden surge in fitting brackets is to do with the time limit to act on this has run out. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali
2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu
2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai
Post #1013257 30th Oct 2023 7:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17353

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Dinnu wrote:
... looking at the 2nd picture, it looks like the swivel housing bolts have failed, not the axle...


The OS swivel has fractured in the impact with the wall, the NS weld failed initiating the impact.

Incidentally if you follow the videos of "grizzlynbear" on YouTube you will recall that their 130 suffered a similar swivel fracture without the help of a drystone wall (although I have a recollection that it was not an original swivel).

[This post was delayed in editing by about 30 mins by a phone call so apologies if it is now old news]
Post #1013258 30th Oct 2023 7:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
PWD



Member Since: 30 Oct 2023
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 5

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Blenheim Silver
Ianh wrote:
I think his nearside weld broke and what you are seeing is the offside damage due to hitting the wall[/i]


Yes, youre correct Ianh, it was the NSF weld that failed resulting in hitting the wall which damaged the OSF.
Post #1013260 30th Oct 2023 7:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3410

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
So strange that such an impact sheared the swivel housing bolts, and did not cause the offside weld to fail. Whereas the nearside weld apparently can even fail under own vehicle weight while parked in a driveway!!

Given that the diff is biased to the right, any fatigue from bumps etc should cause the offside weld to fail earlier!!! But is not the case. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #1013263 30th Oct 2023 7:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 25 of 39 <123 ... 242526 ... 373839>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums