Home > Puma (Tdci) > Any regrets? |
|
|
NinetyTD4 Member Since: 22 Apr 2011 Location: North Posts: 397 |
Those who regret aint here cause they sold em. Never forget: cars have owner, Landrover have field service personnel.
|
||
28th Oct 2011 11:14am |
|
warren Member Since: 14 Oct 2009 Location: East Lancs. Posts: 903 |
I bought Big Black instead of a house... And despite having major fall outs with it at times I still don't regret it - I just need to sit behind the wheel....
In fact the only 'regret' as such is that I couldn't afford a 110 USW... But the 90 does me just fine, and can't see that changing. |
||
28th Oct 2011 11:41am |
|
22900013A Member Since: 23 Dec 2010 Location: Oxfordshire Posts: 3149 |
Had mine since May, done just under 27000 miles in it since. No regrets at all, its a super truck. 2011 110 USW
1973 Series III 1-Ton 1972 Series III 1-Ton Cherrypicker 1969 IIA 1-Ton 1966 IIA 88" |
||
28th Oct 2011 7:14pm |
|
ZeDefender Member Since: 15 Sep 2011 Location: Munich Posts: 4731 |
You as well? Tell someone you love them today because life is short. But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing... |
||
28th Oct 2011 9:50pm |
|
CRJ Member Since: 12 Mar 2011 Location: Sealand - Denmark Posts: 253 |
I enjoy driving it every day - no regrets at all - if I wasn't΄all over happy with the 130 I would not pay 3.000 a year in "envy" tax (road tax) - as one have to do in Denmark 88 Ser. 3 1980 -sold
Puma 130 - 08- sold 90 200tdi 1991 - sold 88 Ser. 3 1977 200 TDI 110 CC 2003 |
||
29th Oct 2011 6:23am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4655 |
That is even dearer than us-need to make you president of the site for such dedication. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
29th Oct 2011 2:26pm |
|
Grockle Member Since: 24 Nov 2008 Location: Peak District National Park Posts: 2266 |
'ere Spud how much is your RFL thses days, we paying £460 for our 08 2.4 90 XS
1968 1/32 scale Britains 109 Pick up. |
||
29th Oct 2011 2:46pm |
|
pope10001 Member Since: 15 Oct 2011 Location: Dulverton Posts: 489 |
My only regret is that i had to buy it from a company that has such bad, sorry non existent customer service. I will never buy a new vehicle from LR again!
|
||
29th Oct 2011 3:16pm |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4655 |
935 on the 08. The 2011 Defender costs me 935 aswell as a Private owing to the reclassification thing otherwise it would be 2200 per year. As the 2011 is a "commercial" and I tax it as a "private" it costs 935.Taxing a "commercial" as "private" they go by the old engine cc system so I save quite a bit.If I could tax it as a commercial it would be 288 per year. It is very difficult to tax anything as a commercial here as you have to prove that is for your business. Even then there a restrictions as to use.The reclassification of the Defender to commercial brought the purchase price down dramatically otherwise we would not have the 2011.Without the commercial reclassification loophole thing the 110 csw would run nearly 60,000 with a road tax of 2200 per year.The 2.2 will be slightly cheaper at 823 per year. Bought the Puma 2.4 incase the loophole closed, and I was not keen on a DPF. 1982 88" 2.25 diesel
1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
29th Oct 2011 3:29pm |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4655 |
In future please preface any communication with "Mr Spudfan" 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
29th Oct 2011 3:44pm |
|
DefenderOfTheEarth Member Since: 09 Nov 2010 Location: Cornwall, UK Posts: 1304 |
Snap Defender 110XS SW gone... now VW California 180 4 Motion. |
||
29th Oct 2011 4:23pm |
|
rossy Member Since: 29 Nov 2010 Location: Co. Roscommon Posts: 1296 |
Mr. Spudfan
we sure are lucky boys aren't we ? (and CR too ). Explaining the VRT loophole situation to neighbours and other inquisitive people who admire the Land rover in carparks (and how it has now finished !) always results in their disappointment when realising that they will be paying a lot more than me if they want one. But ultimately its the government who are the losers as 13.3 % VRT and 935 is better than zero which is what it will be now as nobody will be buying at 60k and 2100 tax. |
||
30th Oct 2011 12:02pm |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4655 |
Don't think it is finished. I think it is still in place but with a maximum of 5 seats and a fairly hefty price increase since August.Think the standard vehicle here in the future could be the 110 USW,5 seats and the rear panels. Then again you could be right as things might have changed. Like you I have had numerous conversations regarding the 110 and it's reclassification and it's merits, in the most unlikliest of places.Anyway glad I got in on the act incase things have chaged.
On another subject-I hope you got your turf out by now, if not you are in bother!!!! 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
30th Oct 2011 1:48pm |
|
IanW Member Since: 12 Jun 2011 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 172 |
No regrets. 5000 miles in the 110 CSW since July, much of it with a large caravan on the back. Much better than the predecessor Disco 2 - apart from the hitching awkwardness which an NAS step might sort out. Ian One wife - livid
|
||
30th Oct 2011 7:55pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis