![]() | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Replacing TDCI engine with TD5 engine. |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
miker Member Since: 13 Sep 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 1768 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like a worse idea than just buying a TD5 defender!
|
||
![]() |
|
bpman Member Since: 21 May 2008 Location: Oslo Posts: 8069 ![]() ![]() |
The td5 engine is a master piece and the foibles are known and fixable, physically it will fit but you'll have challenges around the electronics for the dash, abs etc
|
||
![]() |
|
ibexman Member Since: 13 Dec 2008 Location: Essex Posts: 2956 ![]() ![]() |
TD5 last of the GREAT Land Rover engines
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Jukathy Member Since: 25 Jan 2015 Location: Berlin Posts: 170 ![]() ![]() |
TDI would be clever.
Good cars are avaible. Just buy one. |
||
![]() |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17598 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's probably no harder that fitting a Puma bulkhead and dash in a TD5, but you'd need to change the engine and gearbox complete*.
The problem, as with fitting a Puma dash in a TD5, would be that the CanBus IPAC won't work with the TD5 ECU. If you fitted a TD5 instrument panel in place of the TDCI panel you could avoid this problem. * No point leaving the GFT MT982 box in since the ratios would be wrong (low first probably dangerously so without idle jack) and arguable the output adaptor shaft is the single biggest flaw in the TDCi design. So although the MT82 itself is a much better engineered box and nicer to drive that the TD5's awful 5-speed, it would probably have to go. |
||
![]() |
|
epictrail Member Since: 20 Sep 2013 Location: High Wycombe Posts: 395 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't use the 6 speed box on a TD5. Ashcrofts tried to make it work and I was told couldn't
|
||
![]() |
|
Super7 Member Since: 05 Feb 2014 Location: South Bucks. Posts: 134 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
and I was thinking about putting a TDi in my TD5!
|
||
![]() |
|
Fatboy Slim Member Since: 04 Feb 2008 Location: Bridgend Posts: 1006 ![]() ![]() |
Why would you want to do that? I like the tdis but the 5 is better in every way
|
||
![]() |
|
GREENI Member Since: 22 Aug 2010 Location: staffs Posts: 10383 ![]() ![]() |
I like this thread!!!!
If you fit a td5, you need to take a recip saw to the bulkhead vent blanks...to make the Puma a 'proper' Land Rover ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 20612 ![]() ![]() |
Only 2 benefits I can think of that the TD5 has. (I've never driven one mind you)
Is the sound is sweet, and it's 5 pot. |
||
![]() |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8165 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Chris - complete with td5 box? Cheers
James 110 2010 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
![]() |
|
Cupboard Member Since: 21 Mar 2014 Location: Suffolk Posts: 2971 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another is the vents, they're great. |
||
![]() |
|
Fatboy Slim Member Since: 04 Feb 2008 Location: Bridgend Posts: 1006 ![]() ![]() |
And more economical Faster Has MEUI fuel injection Has a timing chain instead of a poxy belt Can produce V8 killing performance easily Dead simple to work on Has a decent cooling system I'm on my 9th, also look after several site vehicles that never see a road and also own a 200 and 300. Had several Tdis of my own, and a 2.4 but as an all rounder the Td5 is without a doubt the king. |
||
![]() |
|
Super7 Member Since: 05 Feb 2014 Location: South Bucks. Posts: 134 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My comment was half tongue-in-cheek, but a simpler, cheaper to repair engine does appeal sometimes. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![](../images/layout/footer/disclaimer.gif)