↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > I AM going to need a CAT!
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 3 <123>
Print this entire topic · 
Lorryman100



Member Since: 01 Oct 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 2686

In my case and as it is a visual inspection how will the tester see the cat under the heat shield? The decat I have fitted from Alive tuning has the brackets that allow refitting of the heat shield in its original position so the cat is not in view. Fair enough he will see its missing from below but will he go to the bother of checking the cat from under the vehicle when it is on the ramp? To be honest I don't really care just now because if it fails the MOT due to the decat, then I will just have to source and fit a sports cat for retesting. Cat has been removed so no point in my worrying about it possibly failing a MOT till it actually happens IMHO Thumbs Up


Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge


Admin note: this post has had its images recovered from a money grabbing photo hosting site and reinstated Mr. Green
Post #306010 7th Feb 2014 8:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Porny
Site Sponsor


Member Since: 31 Aug 2009
Location: Sutton Coldfield - West Midlands
Posts: 809

 
Personally I would just wait until after the 16th before worrying about it...

As with every new piece of legislation, there has to be rules, documents, explanations around it. And at the moment all that has been released is a blanket rule that a diesel must have a CAT or CAT/DPF if originally fitted... there is no supporting information been released.

I spend half of my life, reading, understanding, making sense of documentation and more importantly legislation - as you 'have' to understand what you can and can't do. There are lots of things that will often be considered close to the edge - often referred to as 'not really in the spirit of the rules' - but in reality if what are doing doesn't actually cross the line, then you are not doing anything wrong - apart from stretching the window of possibility.

There is no way they can make a blanket statement that a vehicle must be fitted with a CAT if it was originally supplied with it.... for the reason how will the MOT tester know what the specification of the vehicle was?

Some of the MOT testers I've met struggle to write their name, let alone have a in-depth knowledge of every vehicle.

Lets look at some examples:

Take a 2001MY Defender that was the last 2001MY Defender produced on the line. This was built to EU2 spec and did not require a CAT to meet that legislation.

The next vehicle on the track was the first 2002MY Defender. This was built to EU3 specification and did require a CAT. Both are registered as 2002 Vehicles.

How will an MOT tester know that the 2001MY model didn't have a CAT from new, but the 2002MY version did.

Unless they are introducing a new database system - they won't. But this hasn't been mentioned yet....

Perhaps they are working on a huge database... but in reality I don't think this would be in place for any 'semi' modern vehicle.


It could be a blanket rule based on year, but this would require some serious investigation and huge knowledge of Emissions Classes. A Defender does not come under the same rules as emissions as say a Ford Fiesta.

So for a example a 2004 Ford Fiesta would have stricter limits to meet - and thus would require more emissions related components than a 2004 Defender which has a less stringent limit to meet, thus would not require the same control over the engine emissions. Going one step further back and using the 2001 Defender as an example... A 2001 Fiesta Diesel had a CAT, a 2001 Defender didn't....

This is why DPF's have been around for much longer on 'passenger vehicles' (i.e. smaller cars) than say a Defender - which only had a DPF fitted in 2012.


I'm not saying a blanket year wouldn't work, but IMHO it would have to be post 2008 (or there abouts) - which also happens to coinside with the change to MOT rules a few year ago that say the smoke limit level dropped (for post 2008).


At the moment, all of these threads are doing nothing but scaremongering.

Until I see a copy of the rules and regulations (which there has to be!) all of this do I/don't I stuff is pointless.

People also keep mentioning Type Approval - type approved parts is a different subject entirely - and more that you would want to discuss on a forum. A further debate on how effective - and real - the current emission test cyles are would be an equally exciting debate.. not.

Ian IRB
The home of the first modified Keswick Green 90 - and the first 2.4 Puma through both the 200bhp and 550Nm barriers.

www.IRBdevelopments.com

www.facebook.com/irbdevelopments

www.integrated316.com

www.facebook.com/integrated316
Post #306017 7th Feb 2014 8:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
Good post, and as for that year bit, mine has a build date of January 2002, registered in May and had a cat fitted. I thought that the cats were fitted to Defenders along with the dashboard facelift and the 15P engine and carried on up to present day.
Post #306022 7th Feb 2014 9:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Thanks Ian, a lot of 'food for thought' there! It may be a little panic on my behalf and you are correct, a lot more clarification is required. I have a number of months before test but think 'doing something' may be the prudent thing to do rather than do nothing. Waiting a few weeks won't hurt either and your contribution has allayed the great urgency I felt.
Brian I hate the idea of my vehicle failing an MOT when I have the time to do something about it, that comes with mild OCD affliction.

Laughing Thumbs Up If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #306024 7th Feb 2014 9:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landlord



Member Since: 27 Oct 2009
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 582

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Td5 HT Cairns Blue
Hi K9F, you probably saw my post on the other thread hence getting my MOT on Monday. At least I'll then have 12 months to see what the outcome of the legislation is / what aftermarket CATs are suddenly available.

Could this be the start of the no mods, original equipment, OEM parts only, EU legislation that was discussed months ago ? 2007 TD5 90 Hard Top
Post #306039 7th Feb 2014 9:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Hi Landlord,

Yes I read your post and would have done exactly as you have done in your case. I am surprised the intention is to bring this in retrospectively if that is the case. I can see more legislation being inevitable. As a motorcyclist look how long they tried to bring in the 100BHP rule?
There will be others that are due MOTs after the deadline and it will be interesting to find more detailed information. Time will tell but I will still have 'something' in place metaphorically speaking for my test.....Looks like I'll have to.

Thumbs Up If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #306053 7th Feb 2014 10:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landlord



Member Since: 27 Oct 2009
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 582

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Td5 HT Cairns Blue
Just as annoying is the MOT was due on the 16th March, I could, therefore, have had an MOT on the 17th Feb and got 13 months Confused The new legislation comes in on the 16th Feb.

Getting an MOT on Monday means I've lost a month but gained some breathing time to see how it all pans out Exclamation 2007 TD5 90 Hard Top


Last edited by Landlord on 7th Feb 2014 10:50pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #306057 7th Feb 2014 10:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ickle



Member Since: 22 Jul 2010
Location: South Vendee
Posts: 1777

France 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 CSW Alpine White
OK, question for Ian, Brian and others of a technical persuasion.

A cat uses various metals and heat to get rid of various nasties from the exhaust gasses.

A PDF does as above but also burns off the soot.

What equipment would be required to test the above are indeed working?

Cheers Keith
Post #306061 7th Feb 2014 10:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RockJaw



Member Since: 15 Oct 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 317

United States 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Santorini Black
Landlord wrote:
Just as annoying is the MOT was due on the 16th March, I could, therefore, have had an MOT on the 17th Feb and got 13 months Confused The new legislation comes in on the 16th Feb.

Getting an MOT on Monday means I've lost a month but gained some breathing time to see how it all pans out Exclamation


Brilliant idea!!

And it really is quite obvious isn't it? If there is no solution at hand before the 16th, just get the paperwork done now and take 13 months to sort the mess out. ****CENSORED****
Post #306079 8th Feb 2014 1:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
Here we go, they're starting to pop up on fleabay now

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Land-Rover-Defen...3cd09440a1
Post #306366 8th Feb 2014 9:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Regard



Member Since: 08 Dec 2011
Location: RSA
Posts: 251

South Africa 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Orkney Grey
Oh how glad am I to be living in dark Africa when I read things like this.......luckily our "gouvernmounts" (as said with a deep African accent) is so bloody busy being corrupt that they will never have time to think out these idiotic legislations!

A road worthy vehicle here is seen as one that have any sort of wooden material for brake pads, a vice grip for steering wheel, six different color panels around the car and four different sized/retreaded tyres......



Ps...I have a full intact 2.4 cat laying in the garage. I wont need it anytime soon here in Africa Rolling Eyes Let me know if it will be worth your while.
Post #306434 9th Feb 2014 6:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Work in progress......


Click image to enlarge
 If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #319305 26th Mar 2014 8:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jimbob7



Member Since: 06 Jul 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 2055

Porny wrote:
Personally I would just wait until after the 16th before worrying about it...

There is no way they can make a blanket statement that a vehicle must be fitted with a CAT if it was originally supplied with it.... for the reason how will the MOT tester know what the specification of the vehicle was?

Some of the MOT testers I've met struggle to write their name, let alone have a in-depth knowledge of every vehicle.

Lets look at some examples:

Take a 2001MY Defender that was the last 2001MY Defender produced on the line. This was built to EU2 spec and did not require a CAT to meet that legislation.

The next vehicle on the track was the first 2002MY Defender. This was built to EU3 specification and did require a CAT. Both are registered as 2002 Vehicles.

How will an MOT tester know that the 2001MY model didn't have a CAT from new, but the 2002MY version did.

Perhaps they are working on a huge database... but in reality I don't think this would be in place for any 'semi' modern vehicle.

Ian


On Defenders ABS is an optional extra. AFAIK, the mot tester knows whether it's fitted when he enters your reg/vin,he's then told about the ABS warning light sequence. Pov.spec,ftw. 2006, 110,TD5.
Post #319430 27th Mar 2014 8:02am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
I find it funny that the de cat pipes for sale are still same money , same as tax disc holders think I would by trying to get rid of them by now
Post #319433 27th Mar 2014 8:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dave H



Member Since: 18 Aug 2013
Location: Bexley
Posts: 28

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Zermatt Silver
Hi guys, I have an impending MOT and no CAT, and have just found the Allisport C-Cat. Not sure if they supply it to retro fit or with a down pipe but have asked the question!


Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge
Post #321421 3rd Apr 2014 9:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 3 <123>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums