↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > (Yet another) Rear Recovery Point Question
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
mikeh501



Member Since: 07 Jan 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1142

United Kingdom 
ive got both of these on my 90. cant recommend the 2" receiver system highly enough. get it from safari equip for approx £130. they sell them to most of the other 4x4 retailers.

not my 90, but is exactly the same.

Click image to enlarge


The drop plate which comes with it drops in for towing.


Click image to enlarge
Post #213404 22nd Feb 2013 8:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
x-isle



Member Since: 26 May 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1327

Wales 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
They are great, but as already mentioned by Pam, no good for me if I needed to tow as I've got an SW so won't be type approved. Craig Rogers

2007 Puma 110 XS
2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux
www.craigrogers.photography
Post #213417 22nd Feb 2013 9:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mikeh501



Member Since: 07 Jan 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1142

United Kingdom 
x-isle wrote:
They are great, but as already mentioned by Pam, no good for me if I needed to tow as I've got an SW so won't be type approved.


gotcha, mines a 1994 so it doesnt matter.
Post #213456 22nd Feb 2013 9:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Timo K



Member Since: 23 Aug 2012
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 171

Finland 
x-isle wrote:
The spacing on the tow bar plate is different to the spacing on the cross member, so thats a no no.

Back on the hitch pin then. I notice there's a 5000kg version that has a 4 bolt flange.

Anyone either know if the plate on my tow bar is spaced for a 4 bolt flange? Or know what the bolt spacing is so I can measure it?

It looks similar?



The Dixon-Bate four bolt tow hitches (inc. NATO jaw) should be 85x45mm. 99% certain of this. Don't shoot me if I'm wrong...
Post #213513 23rd Feb 2013 8:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JSG



Member Since: 12 Jul 2007
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2412

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Re: (Yet another) Rear Recovery Point Question
x-isle wrote:
Hypothetically (now that's a big Friday word!) thinking.......

I've been looking at some rear recovery point options. Not that I hope to ever get that extreme that I'd need pulling out, but you never know......

I have a standard (Witter, I beleive) tow pack, but don't have the ball fitted. I don't plan on removing it, but was thinking of bolting a Swivel Shackle point on. My tow bar bolts to the bottom 2 of the 6 cross member holes and the Shackle point probably won't squeeze onto the top 4, therefore. Do you think that it would be good/strong/safe enough to bolt on top of the tow bar using the 4 mounting points? Therefore, 2 in the cross member and 2 in the tow bar bracket. Hope that make sense.

Here's the photos of the Swivel Shackle point and my 110 showing the tow bar setup.







That swivel should fit using the four tapped holes above your tow bar - thats where they are designed to fit. Thumbs Up


Click image to enlarge
 John

http://www.hampshire4x4response.co.uk

2011 Tdci 110 CSW XS
Post #213786 24th Feb 2013 12:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
x-isle



Member Since: 26 May 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1327

Wales 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
Thanks John, that's what I want but I think it will foul the top of the tow bar.

Thinking out loud, I could fabricate a plate to space it out flush with the tow bar! Craig Rogers

2007 Puma 110 XS
2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux
www.craigrogers.photography
Post #213788 24th Feb 2013 12:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JSG



Member Since: 12 Jul 2007
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 2412

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
x-isle wrote:
Thanks John, that's what I want but I think it will foul the top of the tow bar.

Thinking out loud, I could fabricate a plate to space it out flush with the tow bar!


Try it first - mine didn't so unless the fixing plate on the rear step is a lot smaller than the tow bar it would be ok.

If you need to put some spacers in that should work - the holes are the same size and spacing as a NATO hitch. John

http://www.hampshire4x4response.co.uk

2011 Tdci 110 CSW XS
Post #213798 24th Feb 2013 1:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
SteveT247



Member Since: 21 Feb 2011
Location: Central
Posts: 491

England 2002 Defender 90 Td5 XS CSW Bonatti Grey
Andy Jeff wrote:
Found some pictures!





HTH.

Andy.
I really like that, sturdy without taking much away from the departure angle. Thumbs Up
Post #213841 24th Feb 2013 4:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Glynparry25



Member Since: 16 Feb 2009
Location: Miserable Midlands
Posts: 3015

Wales 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS DCPU Tonga Green
Not too sure I am reading this right....... But are you talking about fitting a recovery point to your tow bar mount? If so I would highly advise against it. A Defender in the mud would quite easily excess the 3.5 ton capacity. You really are looking at either on your rear cross member or jate rings.

Glyn
Post #213846 24th Feb 2013 4:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
The 3.5 tonne figure is only a legal capacity (for a trailer with overrun brakes) rather than a physical limit. The bracket will be good for a lot more than that in the real world. Also, JATE rings only use the same mounts as the lower stays on the tow bar.

Something mounted directly to the crossmember may be ultimately stronger, but only if a proper spreader plate is used. Anything that relies only on the existing threaded holes won't be any stronger than a standard tow bar, which uses the same of similar mounting points and stays back to the chassis rails. Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia
Post #213880 24th Feb 2013 5:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Glynparry25



Member Since: 16 Feb 2009
Location: Miserable Midlands
Posts: 3015

Wales 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS DCPU Tonga Green
LandRoverAnorak wrote:
The 3.5 tonne figure is only a legal capacity (for a trailer with overrun brakes) rather than a physical limit. The bracket will be good for a lot more than that in the real world. Also, JATE rings only use the same mounts as the lower stays on the tow bar.

Something mounted directly to the crossmember may be ultimately stronger, but only if a proper spreader plate is used. Anything that relies only on the existing threaded holes won't be any stronger than a standard tow bar, which uses the same of similar mounting points and stays back to the chassis rails.


Yes having more points of contact can be beneficial, but when talking about a how hitch rated to a trailer capacity of 3.5 tons it is only talking about the forces involved whilst towing a trailer on a suitable surface- a 3.5 ton trailer won't put more than about 500ish Kg of force on the tow bracket- if it did you would start to lose control of your truck and most likely end up on your roof depending on the angles involved. I have seen a lightly loaded sankey trailer (total weight of about 1 ton) take a 110 over with little effort.

When towing a trailer it is a steady load on a specified area from a specific direction and angles- this is not the case when doing recovery. You want the recovery point as close to the chassis as possible- as with all the recovery brackets above is basically a few mm away from it.

But I also don't see any point in keeping a tow plate on a truck if it will never be used for towing....... Would be safer to just fit a recovery point or a class 3 receiver for recovery purposes.

Glyn Dog Sheep
Post #213888 24th Feb 2013 6:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
x-isle



Member Since: 26 May 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1327

Wales 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
Many wise words, however as already mentioned. The tow bar is staying so that I can still tow when the need arises.

I actually think the tow bar would be stronger then just a crossmember without a spread plate behind it. What I'm trying to achieve is a combination of keeping the tow bar and have a recovery point which is what my first question was about. I'm trying to utilise the crossmember with keeping the tow bar in place. Craig Rogers

2007 Puma 110 XS
2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux
www.craigrogers.photography
Post #213949 24th Feb 2013 7:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
x-isle



Member Since: 26 May 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1327

Wales 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
...on topic....

Take a look at this Professional How To Guide to Recovery! Shocked

 Craig Rogers

2007 Puma 110 XS
2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux
www.craigrogers.photography
Post #214149 25th Feb 2013 12:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Glynparry25



Member Since: 16 Feb 2009
Location: Miserable Midlands
Posts: 3015

Wales 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS DCPU Tonga Green
As above.... using tow bars.... 'might want to also do a youtube search for "Land Rover Destruction"- the same bunch of chavs', 'muppets'.... no offence intended to the rest of you 'chavs', 'muppetss' out there using LR tow brackets/ points.

how about.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ire31FrEAI

A company who have several years (since 1974) perfecting recovery in the outback where it REALLY counts and no mention of 'tow bars or mounts'...... more about 'recovery points'

To the OP.... I would suggest the same as what I did and speak to a local engineering company and get a spreader plate manufactured that will allow you to mount a recovery point to the chassis above the 'tow' plate.

Glyn Dog Sheep
Post #214204 25th Feb 2013 4:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums