Home > General & Technical (L663) > More DC100 bashing... |
|
|
A1C6 Member Since: 15 Oct 2024 Location: Australia Posts: 53 |
Defender high roof I think is what people need. It’d be pretty sick as well. Kind of like the Disco 2 with its stepped roof.
|
||
1st Dec 2024 11:01pm |
|
Moo Member Since: 01 Oct 2021 Location: UK Posts: 1388 |
Or they just do the next Discovery properly Eiger Grey MY23 D250 SE with bits. Known as Noddy.
|
||
1st Dec 2024 11:42pm |
|
zilch Member Since: 11 Sep 2019 Location: Whitsundays & Sydney Posts: 820 |
Outside of the data, when I ordered ours back in 2019 just after the launch, as a replacement for our 2010 RRS (which we still have), our dealer told us at the time that many of the orders where by existing customers, a large chunk discovery owners, but who had not and would not make the move from the D4 to the D5 irrespective of subtle discount offers. The D5 was deemed by many as not a true Disco, but more RRS like. The dealer’s perspective was the Defender helped them retain customers who would more than likely move to the Japanese brands once their D3/4’s where due replacement.. so the Defender was good initially for brand retention and then some modest customer expansion in the Aussie market yet another pommie bar steward down under MY20 110 P400 SE Defender MY10 3.0 RR Sport |
||
2nd Dec 2024 12:47am |
|
TexasRover Member Since: 24 Nov 2022 Location: Paris Posts: 1073 |
We currently have (again) a D4 after having owned 3x D4 and 1x D3 (in different countries hence the turnover), but I would never ever consider the D5. I am sure it is a great car but I don't see any market differentiator or special appeal.
There are many cars in the D5 segment from other brands that make The D5 just too bend in for me (Ford Explorer etc) The D4 and (new) Defender on the other hand don't blend in and the D4 is just such a practical vehicle (don't own the new Defender). D4 is a van with style. If only it had a better engine selection. Here in France all you can get is that crappy tdv6.. Same engine in the D5 actually so not even an improvement there. |
||
2nd Dec 2024 8:10am |
|
LR Nuts Member Since: 10 Aug 2022 Location: UK Posts: 1131 |
" The D4 and (new) Defender on the other hand don't blend in ......"
Click image to enlarge Click image to enlarge ......yes they do in this drivers mind ....... |
||
2nd Dec 2024 8:47am |
|
Chicken Drumstick Member Since: 17 Aug 2020 Location: Near MK Posts: 751 |
Agree the actual vehicle is what Land Rover needed, the D5 is ok, I don't hate it, but what a cock-up of a model it is when you look at what D3/4 owners actually wanted. For some reason in the car industry, there is this weird belief that models need to evolve and be moved up a segment or two. No idea why a vehicle can't just be what it was and let new models be introduced into new segments. |
||
2nd Dec 2024 11:21am |
|
Moo Member Since: 01 Oct 2021 Location: UK Posts: 1388 |
^^^
Mercedes have done this well with the G-Wagon. Eiger Grey MY23 D250 SE with bits. Known as Noddy. |
||
2nd Dec 2024 11:58am |
|
dspuk Member Since: 25 Oct 2024 Location: South Posts: 20 |
Had some fun reading the numbers. I agree that the only thing that is "fact" is Defender sales are rising and RRS and Disco sales dropping. That they were both dropping for 4 years prior to the Defender introduction is clear, but why would need analysis. The drop seems to be on the same trendline trajectory it would have been on, Defender or not - one would assume a sharper drop had it been more directly linked.
Causes could be theft security issues meaning people were buying less, company tax breaks and luxury car tax increases/removal, or indeed the Defender introduction. Covid will also have had an effect due to parts shortages. It is worth noting that JLR are not a volume manufacturer, like Ford, or Nissan, my old employer. As such the reduction in sales for the other models could be a planned and deliberate supply chain constriction to move sales across to more profitable product lines. Be interested to understand the Disco bump in 17, and what caused that and if there are further factors such as sales and marketing incentives. 23 and 24 figures wopuld also give a bigger picture. Click image to enlarge Last edited by dspuk on 2nd Dec 2024 2:00pm. Edited 3 times in total |
||
2nd Dec 2024 12:14pm |
|
TexasRover Member Since: 24 Nov 2022 Location: Paris Posts: 1073 |
I was reading today that UK EV sales are showing healthy numbers BUT likely because of the UK punitively fines imposed on car companies that don't make the EV targets: Car companies are registering cars without selling them in order to avoid the fines.
So this data can be all skewed for reasons other than customer's natural purchasing behaviour |
||
2nd Dec 2024 1:22pm |
|
dspuk Member Since: 25 Oct 2024 Location: South Posts: 20 |
It’s an odd one. The market here has become flooded with cheaper Chinese made EV’s. The tax breaks for ownership have reduced dramatically though and the charging network remains fragmented and woeful. Dealer registrations might be on the up but their actual ownership seems to be fading. Sales are swaying more towards hybrids here, not as “mild” as the Defenders, but mild enough to not reduce power but still have some sort of tax breaks, be it private sales costs or company car. |
||
2nd Dec 2024 1:49pm |
|
dspuk Member Since: 25 Oct 2024 Location: South Posts: 20 |
Double post. Edited to remove second one.
|
||
2nd Dec 2024 1:49pm |
|
H1Tad Member Since: 20 Jul 2024 Location: Maine Posts: 126 |
Private EV sales of 59,500 are 3.8 per cent down year on year, true fleet registrations of 142,174 are only 1.6 per cent up; it is dealer and manufacturer registrations which are up 12.8 and 27.8 per cent respectively, with demonstrator cars up 37.7 per cent and Motability registrations of 48,750 are a 110.4 per cent increase. So basically the entire "growth" of the EV market in the UK has been a fraud. "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics".
Yes, the data series are correlated as I pointed out in my initial post. The speculation is the assignment of causation of that correlation. Speculation, especially speculation driven by informed observation isn't necessarily a bad thing. We humans do it every day to live our lives. Either way. This horse has been thoroughly beaten. 2022 Defender 110 SE P400 Tasman Blue Expedition and Cold weather package 2003 Hummer H1 P400 Firehouse Red 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser Last edited by H1Tad on 2nd Dec 2024 2:08pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
2nd Dec 2024 2:07pm |
|
Grenadier Member Since: 23 Jul 2014 Location: The foot of Mont Blanc... Posts: 5829 |
[quote="Chicken Drumstick"][quote="zilch"]
This is what I don’t get about LR’s (Gerry McGovern’s?) decision to recreate the spirit of the Defender? Why did they need to do it? Many people have said what a success the ND has been, and what a great vehicle it is, which, if that’s true, would have been the case come what may. So would it have been any different had it been branded ‘Discovery’? No, it wouldn’t. Because it absolutely meets what most Discovery owners are looking for, and importantly weren’t getting from the D5. Most, there will always be exceptions. This would then have allowed LR to redevelop the Defender in the image of the <2016 model, but better. Better reliability ( ), better power, better comfort. In essence, the Grenadier, but with better modularity and at a better price point. And it could then have tapped into all its old markets which it once monopolised: military, police, utilities, NGOs etc. LR could have had double-bubble. Increased sales from an excellent new SUV that would likely have been as good as they are for the ND now, but they’d also have had the sales from an all new utility Defender, which if Grenadier sales are anything to go by, could have been as many as 20k units per year…and that would be without tapping into the military/police/MR/NGO/etc markets. The UKAF alone have 15k LRs which they’ve had to extend the life of because they can’t find a suitable replacement. But no, LR ignored its legacy, turned a blind eye to its DNA, threw out tens of thousands of loyal customers, (private as well as commercial) to create another SUV that is clearly NOT a Defender, and (IMHO) IS a Discovery. It was hugely short sighted as it could have had the best of both worlds. Personally, I think this is GmcG’s doing. I genuinely think he couldn’t abide that there was a vehicle in his fleet that didn’t have his DNA in it, and also a vehicle didn’t appeal to his image of LR being a luxury brand aimed at successful, urbane, beautiful people. The idea of an entirely classless workhorse that could be all things to all people, was anathema to him. So whilst the Defender is LR’s most successful model (ever?) it could have had equal success in unit number terms as the Disco, and then an improved Defender would have retained old defender owners, plus reclaimed those utility markets. Whilst the idea of model evolution is valid, there is also an arguement that certain vehicles need to remain, in essence, the same. The best example of this is the Porsche 911, which as a legacy vehicle is basically the same. One could also make the same argument for the F150, which whilst clearly an all new truck, is basically the same ‘concept’ or ‘purpose’ as the original model from 1948. Monsieur Le Grenadier I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list..... 2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey Last edited by Grenadier on 2nd Dec 2024 2:16pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
2nd Dec 2024 2:08pm |
|
TexasRover Member Since: 24 Nov 2022 Location: Paris Posts: 1073 |
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/...cle-market |
||
2nd Dec 2024 2:13pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis