Home > Maintenance & Modifications > SNORKEL ! Mantec or Land Rover ? |
|
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
It is indeed undoubtedly alot easier to fit than the SS580 but you will still end up with the four mounting bolts visible and the 'wasted base' shaped to contain the four bolts! For looks the SS580 has no visible mounting bolts and allthough harder to fit looks better in my opinion! If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
30th May 2010 8:29pm |
|
alantd Member Since: 14 Dec 2008 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 1513 |
I completely agree. If I'm really going deep enough and for long enough to trouble the RAI then I'll likely have bigger problems - not just mechanical/electrical but more importantly a completely soggy interior! I'm afraid I have to admit that I'm never going to turn my puma into a deep water explorer. However, having some extra protection will give me the courage to enter water up to around 700mm knowing that I can probably drop the RHS into a dip temporarily and get away with it. One that started out as a 2.4 TDCi 110 XS + New Defender 110 First Edition |
||
30th May 2010 10:10pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
Couldnt have put it better exactly my view
The point is (and i assume) you kept moving. With most of these snorkel situations, as long as you keep moving you will be ok - there will be a depression of water in the engine, the air is being sucked in and the exhaust is blowing out at some good pressure. When you stop is the actual test of your snorkel Mike |
||
31st May 2010 8:59am |
|
dgardel Member Since: 30 Nov 2008 Location: Veneto (Heart & Head) Posts: 3586 |
In my opinion (and for my finance saving) if I'll must cross a river with more than 50-60 cm of water I'll use this one:
or I'll rent this one Discovery 5 td6 HSE Stornoway Gray Outback Engineering Limited Edition IID Pro MV License |
||
31st May 2010 10:19am |
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
For comparison.... New design SS581 with four mounting bolts visible. Harder to fit SS580 no bolts visible. If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
31st May 2010 5:39pm |
|
harveyg77 Member Since: 09 Apr 2010 Location: Derby Posts: 309 |
Is the only difference between the 580 and 581 the bolts?
|
||
31st May 2010 6:57pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
Without knowing exactly the only other change is the top mounting bracket, snorkel seal and clearer instructions The advantage over 3 hidden bolts with the four is the uniform contact (and tightening) with the wing. So you remove the issue of any deformed wing not giving uniform sealing - which is common. Mike |
||
31st May 2010 7:20pm |
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
The instructions are more or less exactly the same with the exception of having to drill four smaller holes (with the New model) in comparison to three larger holes with the old for base mounting and three holes in your pillar in comparison to four! Even the airbox sealing pictures are exactly the same.
Uniform tightening can be achieved on both types (old type with a torque wrench if you so wish). With sufficient sealing and attention to detail any deformities of your wing will be immaterial! If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
31st May 2010 8:11pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
Instructions are certainly more clear than mine - infact its one of the sealing pictures that im refering to. Im not sure how you would get a torque wrench in, certainly on the top ones I struggled with my hand and a ratchet spanner - agree with the sealing though - although 4 bolts certainly will do better than the 3 Mike |
||
31st May 2010 10:05pm |
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
Not for looks they won't and if they're up to the usual disappointing standard of the plated fasteners I got with my Safari they'll be rotting out in a matter of a few weeks. Replace with stainless or buy some prior to fitment would be my advice. The pillar fasteners (self-tappers) were the usual black plated ones and by the photo of the SS581 it looks like that's exactly what you'll be getting with the four mounting bolts too as well as the self-tappers. Your fitting instructions must have been different with regard to the sealing pictures....mine were clear and concise (there's a link to them in my previous post). The top nuts I found a doddle to get to, the forward one through the wingtop vent and the rear with a suitable ratchet extension and 'uj' type adaptor for the socket. The bottom ones I found a ' muddle' as I didn't remove the wheel arch spat in fear of breaking the plastic securing rivets and I've got digits like pork sausages, my mate Matty got his lithe-like arm in and done 'em up for me! Cheers Matey if you see this! If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
1st Jun 2010 7:51am |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
The bolts seemed improvement on the disco ones which have been on for 8years and are fine (not plated) the screws seemed the same
I did take the wheel eyebrow off and it was easy the bottom 2 - infact it makes sealing very easy - did you do the bottom drain? You can also get some fantastic waxoyling done The top bolt didnt have a great deal of movement at all - putting my hand through the vent was the easy bit - the ABS modulator and Aerial were in the way when i quickly tried, so moved to the ratchet spanner which worked a treat. What did you torque them too? I hope you have put your plastic washers on those stainless bolts Mike |
||
1st Jun 2010 4:32pm |
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
The lowest setting on my small torque wrench which is either 15 or 20NM I think. Wet assembled the three securing studs and associated 'nylocks' with as much sealant as I could get stuffed in there. With regards to plastic washers or anything else I am off to Rustmaster Hatfield this Thursday where all will be totally encased in Waxoyl 'by two technicians in a five hour process.' Will be staying on site to watch process being done and shall take photos, so I think I will be able to sleep soundly in my bed with regards to corrosion, for the foreseeable future anyway. If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
1st Jun 2010 5:22pm |
|
TJ101 Member Since: 30 May 2007 Location: Taunton Somerset Posts: 3750 |
It was mentioned on maybe this or another thread, about the RAI affecting fuel consumption ??
After 4000 miles in 2 weeks,,,2 x 09 year 110 Pumas, same speed, same route, same roads, same rack, same roof tent, same size and make of Mt tyres etc etc, but one with a Mantec RAI and one without , difference was aprox 4lts of fuel extra, per 40-45lts in the RAI Puma, over the one without, and that extra was put down to the Bas remap fitted to the 110 without the intake ? Plus the amount of dust etc in the air filter was considerably less with the RAI California F1, 75th 110 "Kermit", 50th Ann V8, 90 V8 Hybrid, 55 Series 1 Main Brian James Trailer Dealer for South West UK |
||
2nd Jun 2010 5:18pm |
|
alantd Member Since: 14 Dec 2008 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 1513 |
Wow! That's what I call a controlled experiment One that started out as a 2.4 TDCi 110 XS + New Defender 110 First Edition |
||
4th Jun 2010 10:14pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis