↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Do MT tyres affect MPG much
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
NCTT



Member Since: 07 Apr 2008
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 229

United Kingdom 
Do MT tyres affect MPG much
as above do you think it makes diff , or minimal , any one ever actually checked please
Post #941529 8th Feb 2022 8:06am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
They probably do to an extent - a couple of MPG, perhaps? There are so many other factors though, that it's difficult to get a definitive answer. Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia


Last edited by LandRoverAnorak on 8th Feb 2022 9:06am. Edited 1 time in total
Post #941532 8th Feb 2022 8:19am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3414

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
Tyres have an energy rating.

MTs generally have the lowest rating. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #941533 8th Feb 2022 8:21am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Leamreject



Member Since: 19 Dec 2020
Location: Middle Earth - Leamington Spa
Posts: 970

Italy 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Fuji White
Re: Do MT tyres affect MPG much
NCTT wrote:
as above do you think it makes diff , or minimal , any one ever actually checked please


Compared to a standard road tyres I believe they make a vast difference to your fuel consumption, similar to variations of inflation pressure.

They also make a big difference to road noise, road holding and ride comfort. Ride like you stole it!!
If I’m not on a bike it’s because only a 4x4 will do…
2011 2.4 Puma 90 HT
Post #941537 8th Feb 2022 8:33am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
AMBxx



Member Since: 24 Jul 2016
Location: York
Posts: 1031

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Orkney Grey
It depends (don't you just hate that!).
If you're driving around at 20-40mph, you'll see no difference at all. If you're doing 70mph on the motorway, you'll get slightly worse consumption.
I was very disappointed in the tiny difference going to more road-oriented tyres made to consumption, but very pleased with the reduction in road noise at speed.
Post #941539 8th Feb 2022 8:37am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
camelman



Member Since: 27 Feb 2013
Location: Peak District
Posts: 3372

United Kingdom 
Im running 35inch KM3s and a 2 inch lift on a 2.2 110

Normal mpg is now 23-24 where I used to get 26 previously. 
Post #941540 8th Feb 2022 8:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Leamreject



Member Since: 19 Dec 2020
Location: Middle Earth - Leamington Spa
Posts: 970

Italy 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Fuji White
So if measuring against your 23mpg figure, that’s nearly a 13% reduction in fuel efficiency Ride like you stole it!!
If I’m not on a bike it’s because only a 4x4 will do…
2011 2.4 Puma 90 HT
Post #941544 8th Feb 2022 8:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Angus_Beef



Member Since: 30 Apr 2015
Location: Oslo
Posts: 434

Norway 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Corris Grey
It does depend on a lot of variables, but overall, slightly worse.
I changed 235/85 Contis for 255/85 KM3s for August and September, then to 235 hakkapeliittas in October. Aside from one outlier that was weather related, there is not much difference...



Click image to enlarge
 Roaming around 🇳🇴🇨🇭
Post #941551 8th Feb 2022 9:05am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5808

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
That looks a wonderfully presented bit of data. Apart from the arrows….disappointing DeeEss, disappointing Whistle Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #941558 8th Feb 2022 9:15am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Angus_Beef



Member Since: 30 Apr 2015
Location: Oslo
Posts: 434

Norway 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Corris Grey
Sir, those arrows were drawn by me, personally, with my finger on my phone. Those are rare and special arrows! Laughing Roaming around 🇳🇴🇨🇭
Post #941560 8th Feb 2022 9:19am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
NCTT



Member Since: 07 Apr 2008
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 229

United Kingdom 
Thanks chaps
to be honest i was mildly curious , i dont do alot of miles but im due to change soon so thought id ask

much appreciated to you all
Post #941564 8th Feb 2022 9:21am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5808

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
As mentioned above, there are so many other variables to consider, the first being surely no one who buys/drives a Defender has frugality at the top of their criteria.

Total Weight, usage, road surface, weather conditions, driving style, engine type, mapping, aerodynamics (roof racks and bolt on bits), AND tyres probably have a bigger influence on MPG that just the tyres themselves. At least more than might be lost just in buying a set of MTs over road tyres.

I’d think the greater question about to MT or not to MT would be cost, handling, noise, looks, off-road y/n and MPG (not necessarily in that order as it is horses for courses).

I still can’t make my mind up between (my current) KO2s and the Cooper STT Pro which I think look fab. Do I mind noise? Not really, I’ve always got music on or window open. Do I mind MPG? No, mainly local driving and all claimed through business. Do i mind purchase cost? Not too much given longevity and being put through the business. Do I mind handling? Yes, given I live up twisty mountain roads and do 95% of my driving on them. And especially in snow. That’s why I’m still leaning towards the KO2s as they handle (generally) better and are snow rated.

But do I love the look/stance of the Coopers, damned right, and it’s a constant tousle.

So if it’s something you’re think of doing, hence the OP, I’d suggest looking at the bigger picture… Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #941567 8th Feb 2022 9:27am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
Quote:
surely no one who buys/drives a Defender has frugality at the top of their criteria.

A comment along these lines comes up pretty much any time somebody mentions MPG but I think it's a misplaced criticism. Firstly, everything is relative and a, say, 10% difference in MPG and hence fuel costs may be significant to some, even if it's just the principle of not spending more than is necessary. Secondly, monitoring MPG can be good indicator of something not working properly.

Whilst a Defender may be a relatively inefficient vehicle, there's no reason why it should be more inefficient than necessary for it's chosen usage. Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia


Last edited by LandRoverAnorak on 8th Feb 2022 2:43pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #941578 8th Feb 2022 9:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
camelman



Member Since: 27 Feb 2013
Location: Peak District
Posts: 3372

United Kingdom 
Leamreject wrote:
So if measuring against your 23mpg figure, that’s nearly a 13% reduction in fuel efficiency


Yep, thats about right.
To be fair, I use the 130 as my daily drive now so the 110 doesn't do that many miles so not really a problem. 
Post #941635 8th Feb 2022 1:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
wyvern



Member Since: 13 Dec 2009
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2108

United Kingdom 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Firenze Red
I found that I got better consumption with the new BFG ATRs when fitted after my well used and older Wrangler MT tyres of the same size, but put that down to having new tyres and a larger circumference ...

Since I have had the remap I do find a better consumption on my regular monthly return drive from Cornwall to Scotland, sitting at a comfortable 60-65 all the way.
I’m not an acceleration fan so never race the engine, but its nice to be able to cruse at a reasonable speed and get a good 400 miles out of a tank.

Thumbs Up Poppy - TDCI (Puma) 110XS 2.2 - Camper conversion - see the build here - https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic56530.html
Elgar -TDCI(Puma) 110XS Dormobile - now sold
Devon & Cornwall 4x4 Response - DC126
Post #941639 8th Feb 2022 1:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums