Home > INEOS Grenadier > Main Grenadier discussion thread |
|
|
ChasingOurTrunks Member Since: 19 Aug 2020 Location: Canada Posts: 89 |
I wonder what they mean by "Major international repair centres". That could mean Mercedes or BMW....or it could mean Mitas, John Deere, Caterpillar, or Fountain Tire....Either way, it's got my attention.
I don't have any experience with the BMW engine going in the Grenadier, but it seems like a reasonably typical straight 6 motor. The compression makes me raise an eyebrow as I wonder how that will work on sub-quality fuels available in some parts of the world, but time will tell on that score. I am also curious about the built-in Turbo; they have dramatically increased in reliability when the motors are designed to be turbocharged from the beginning as this one has, but I know Ford have had some issues with turbo'd engines because people drive them on highways and then park; the oil flow then stops and the hot turbo 'cooks' the oil inside it, which causes build-up and eventually they fail. Apparently, it's been really common with Fords just north of 100k kms. Instead they are supposed to be left to idle for a few minutes to cool down (From what I've read), but not many people do that. My info on the BMW motor is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B58 Info on the Ford Turbo issue (Hot Shut Down): https://www.bluespringsfordparts.com/blog/...r-problems There are two barriers for bush fixes -- the need to use proprietary tools for service, and the availability of instructions. If Ineos can spec their motors with typical nuts and bolts, and if I can buy a service manual for the Grenadier for under $200, I'll be happy (or use a similar model to Toyota with a subscription service). BMW (bikes, at least) are notoriously cagey about service manuals and proprietary tools, to the point where the aftermarket has had to come up with tools on their own, like GS911, just so that folks can do their own basic maintenance. Hopefully, Ineos's choice of powerplant won't come with this barrier. If they can stick to standard metric fasteners and provide the manuals, there's no reason I can see that shade-tree mechanics won't be able to do basic maintenance and repairs on their Grenadiers, which also opens up a ton of options for service centres and non-dealer network repairs. |
||
2nd Oct 2020 4:05pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 09 Mar 2018 Location: England Posts: 510 |
Eh? They are totally separate things.
If a new Defender has the optional locking rear diff, it also still has four-wheel brake-activated TC, and the driveshafts and the rest of the drivetrain are no different (just like other modern LRs). |
||
2nd Oct 2020 4:26pm |
|
SteveT247 Member Since: 21 Feb 2011 Location: Central Posts: 491 |
Read your previous post (I quoted it) where you state locking diffs are cheaper.
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 4:28pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 09 Mar 2018 Location: England Posts: 510 |
Manually-locking diffs are obviously cheaper than electronically-controlled limited slip/locking diffs. Traction control via brake application is a totally different thing. |
||
2nd Oct 2020 4:59pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 09 Mar 2018 Location: England Posts: 510 |
In my experience, the best advice is not to drive into the field in the first place, that way there’s no chance you’ll be ringing for the big tractor. |
||
2nd Oct 2020 5:04pm |
|
SteveT247 Member Since: 21 Feb 2011 Location: Central Posts: 491 |
I was talking about T/C/ terrain response, as your original post appeared to be also. As limited slip diffs don't require beefier components the point still stands. I'm sure we're all waiting to hear why you think it's more effective than manual locking diffs, I know I am.
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 5:10pm |
|
Philip Member Since: 09 Mar 2018 Location: England Posts: 510 |
The clear benefit is that an electronically-controlled locking/limited slip diff works in all environments and situations (including on the road), rather than just being locked or open.
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 5:32pm |
|
SteveT247 Member Since: 21 Feb 2011 Location: Central Posts: 491 |
I think you'll find a manual locker(s) work in all environments off road too, and they don't require loss of traction to engage.
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 5:46pm |
|
ickle Member Since: 22 Jul 2010 Location: South Vendee Posts: 1795 |
a proactive system (manual diff locks) suits drivers who are aware of the conditions and vehicle capabilities, a reactive system (abs/tc) suits the less knowledgeable or couldn't care less driver
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 8:05pm |
|
SteveT247 Member Since: 21 Feb 2011 Location: Central Posts: 491 |
Another reason why manufacturers fit them rather than manual locks.
|
||
2nd Oct 2020 8:08pm |
|
diduan Member Since: 13 Oct 2016 Location: Central Balkan Posts: 260 |
Independent suspension with any kind of software control of tire slip has absolutely no advantages against live axles with mechanical lockers for off road vehicles. This is my personal opinion and experience. Don't forget the robustness of live axles and the advantage of a full case locker in terms of diff carrier strength. Defender 110 SW MY2011 2.4tdci decat, no EGR
Jeep Wrangler YJ 1990 4.0. Front 78' Dana 60, Rear CUCV 14 bolt |
||
3rd Oct 2020 9:57am |
|
Martin Site Admin Member Since: 02 Apr 2007 Location: Hook Norton Posts: 6627 |
Thread tidied - chill out guys. 1988 90 Td5 NAS soft top
2015 D90 XS SW |
||
5th Oct 2020 7:56am |
|
Supacat Member Since: 16 Oct 2012 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 11018 |
INEOS Grenadier (@INEOSGrenadier) Tweeted:
Hitting the trail. #Grenadier4x4 #UltimateOffroader #BuiltOnPurpose https://t.co/OnRz1vB5iT https://twitter.com/INEOSGrenadier/status/...50754?s=20 Click image to enlarge |
||
19th Oct 2020 12:40pm |
|
Supacat Member Since: 16 Oct 2012 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 11018 |
Some Canada/North America input: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/drive/arti...owback-to/ |
||
21st Oct 2020 6:34am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis