Home > Puma (Tdci) > 2.2 mpg |
|
|
grafty99 Member Since: 15 Aug 2012 Location: North Devon Posts: 4786 |
I'd definitely be up for removing the dpf, cat and egr but the dpf is so close to the bulkhead that it would be a nightmare to remove and then replace for every mot. Also I'd have to wait 3 years to do it 2002 90 Td5 Station Wagon
1990 Vogue SE Triumph Tiger Explorer 1200 Td5 90 Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic50767.html Tdi 110 Thread https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic69562.html RRC Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic54492.html Instagram http://www.instagram.com/george_grafton |
||
30th Jun 2015 8:44am |
|
Cafe Latte Member Since: 27 May 2015 Location: Ravenshoe Posts: 10 |
No MOT here in Queensland Aus
Chris |
||
30th Jun 2015 9:10am |
|
def_fid Member Since: 07 Mar 2011 Location: worcestershire Posts: 17 |
My Old 300 tdi would only get above 30 mpg if I kept the speed down to 55mph, the speedo read 62-3mph. More than 10% fast. The odometer was also likely to be similarly more than 10% over-reading. If I drove at 75-80 mph, it dropped to 22mpg. My current 2.2 has a totally accurate speedo. I can cruise at 80-85 and I get 25mpg. I haven't tried trundling along at 55, too much fun
|
||
30th Jun 2015 5:35pm |
|
Phil VM2.5 Member Since: 28 Mar 2012 Location: Limelette Posts: 196 |
Hi,
driving as an old man, at 2000 t/min approx 90 - 95 km/h , sometimes a trailler ... - first year average 29 mpg - 9.71 L/100km) (26000km) - year 2 : average 31.8 mpg - 8.88 L/100km (25000km) - year 3 : average 31.8 mpg - 8.88 L/100km (25000km) last hollydays in Auvergne june 2015 : 33.7 hollydays again Auvergne : july 2015 : 35.1 try 35 mpg, (8 L/100 km ) but not easy ... Regards Phil current : defender 110 sw 2.2 puma 2012 and 230.000km today and again my Range Rover VM2.5 engine from 1992 and 528.000km today. One ten 1988 to 1992 1987 BMW GS80 One Ten from 1984 to 1987 One Ten from 1983 to 1984 Serie 3 109 from 1980 to 1983 from 1974 Jeep CJ3B and CJ6 Last edited by Phil VM2.5 on 30th Jul 2015 5:52am. Edited 3 times in total |
||
1st Jul 2015 7:54am |
|
PAT303 Member Since: 25 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 125 |
My 2.4 was shocking from new,I couldn't get under 14ltres per 100,now with over 100,000k's on the clock it gets 10 per 100.Give it time to settle in and don't baby it,drive the sucker. Pat
|
||
1st Jul 2015 10:38am |
|
The Gairloch 1 Member Since: 05 Jun 2014 Location: Gairloch Posts: 6 |
"Always seem to get better figures when touring in the summer in higher temps, even after discounting the type of driving done"
There is some science behind better fuel economy in the summer. As a lorry driver 30 years ago I found I got better mpg by to filling up in the morning as cold fuel from the underground tank expanded with heat. Before anyone shouts this down I have proved it to be true many times and have witnessed other drivers filling their tanks to the brim in the evening, parking up for the night, and seeing a puddle of diesel under the lorry as the fuel expands. I am surprised no one has designed a fuel heater to make use of this phenomenon. |
||
3rd Jul 2015 8:57am |
|
WhiskyJackR Member Since: 25 Nov 2014 Location: Lizard Posts: 159 |
I have a late 2013 2.2
It consistently averages around 24 mpg |
||
6th Jul 2015 9:01pm |
|
Yannis Member Since: 02 Feb 2015 Location: Oxfordshire / Milan Posts: 408 |
Here are my results from new;
Click image to enlarge As you can see there is a noticeable change on the graph. My commute is now 11miles instead of 4.... |
||
8th Jul 2015 2:06pm |
|
Pickles Member Since: 26 May 2013 Location: Melbourne Posts: 3785 |
"Cruise at 80-85 mph"? Pickles. |
||
8th Jul 2015 10:24pm |
|
Neil1967 Member Since: 09 Jul 2015 Location: Limburg Posts: 3 |
Very early days yet, but my new 110 XS does 25-26 MPG. The previous 2001 110 TD5 did 26-28MPG, and the 1983 110 V8 before that did 13 MPG on LPG, so price wise all much of a muchness.
Neil |
||
9th Jul 2015 3:19pm |
|
def_fid Member Since: 07 Mar 2011 Location: worcestershire Posts: 17 |
Only in France😉 |
||
18th Jul 2015 3:22pm |
|
munch90 Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: guildford Posts: 3558 |
I would say it would take a lot longer then between morning and evening to warm fuel up in a underground tank yes agree with fuel expanding over night from a underground tank as the small amount in vehicle tank will warm up without the insulation of the ground around it technically you should get less power from warm fuel , so mpg should suffer with warm fuel , one reason why dragsters will run ice packed fuel coolers to get denser fuel to give more power per certain amount of fuel but I would say the diffirence would be so small you would be hard pushed to notice it on road use |
||
18th Jul 2015 3:38pm |
|
lohr500 Member Since: 14 Sep 2014 Location: Skipton Posts: 1317 |
Ah yes but I bet the sound from the V8 was the best We had a Disco 1 V8 with an LPG conversion and it made me smile every time I drove it. That was when I wasn't fixing the endless stream of electrical problems that plagued it on a regular basis. |
||
18th Jul 2015 4:42pm |
|
SergeantJav Member Since: 23 Jul 2015 Location: London Posts: 63 |
First run down through France and low 20s but then up around 80 on a motorway won't help
|
||
26th Jul 2015 8:36pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis