↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > Vote UKIP
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
Print this entire topic · 
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20453

United Kingdom 
Indeed, wasn't it post 300tdi that were banned so TD5's and Pumas.
Was that the only thing? Wasn't it something to do with redesigning with airbags would be too costly or something or other too.
Post #418435 23rd Apr 2015 4:59pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
gilarion



Member Since: 05 Dec 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 5111

Wales 2007 Defender 90 Other CSW Trident Green
I thought it was all to do with fuel emission and the plans by the European Council and Parliament to bring in stricter measures for new car emissions, which meant there were certain conditions regarding emission levels the Defender just won't meet. For those who like Welsh Mountains and narrow boats have a look at my videos and photos at..

http://www.youtube.com/user/conwy1
Post #418443 23rd Apr 2015 5:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
couplands



Member Since: 31 Aug 2011
Location: Peak District & Cornwall
Posts: 1826

United Kingdom 2001 Defender 90 Td5 HT Oslo Blue
munch90 wrote:
quote:
'There are some that are buying luxury TOTR RR' s and other vehicles worth much much more again at record sales levels'

most aren't buying there just renting and giving back after three years !

not many walk in and hand over 30-40k or more or even get finance and end up actally owning the car


I cant work out why leasing/renting is a good idea. LR are charging 6-7%APR, so over 3-4 years you're going to be paying nearly 30% more than if you'd paid cash. You need to be very rich if you can afford leasing...or am I missing something..?

cheers

simon
Post #418444 23rd Apr 2015 5:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
people haven't got a big lump of cash to pay for them

years ago people had the cars and things they could afford , not any more maybe that's why the country is in the state its in because people were allowed to go in to such debt
Post #418447 23rd Apr 2015 6:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
gilarion wrote:
I thought it was all to do with fuel emission and the plans by the European Council and Parliament to bring in stricter measures for new car emissions, which meant there were certain conditions regarding emission levels the Defender just won't meet.


Would that be the case if you engineered in an Ingenium engine?
Post #418473 23rd Apr 2015 7:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 18 Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 595

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Sumatra Black
munch90 wrote:
there is lots of euro cr@p we could get rid of , if we got out


Like what?
Post #418483 23rd Apr 2015 8:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
Like paying millions of pounds a day to be in it seems a good reason to me

and dont say its so we can trade with europe better , plenty of other countries manage ok

Stupid emission rules , if each country took one plane out the air , would probably do more good then pushing for low emission levels on cars

court of European human rights , now that is really one we can do without !

having to have European cover on your car insurance for 2 weeks or something , puts our insurance up for something some of us will never use , should by my choice if i want it then i want the option of adding it

i would prefer someone telling me what i can and cant do who lives in this country!
Post #418488 23rd Apr 2015 8:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 18 Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 595

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Sumatra Black
So you would vote for less human rights and more emissions? That's just what we need.
Post #418491 23rd Apr 2015 8:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
Human rights for those who deserve to have rights

they are more ways of lowering emissions , but the motorist always seem to be the easy target
Post #418494 23rd Apr 2015 8:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 18 Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 595

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Sumatra Black
Human rights for some but not for others? How would you select who had rights and who doesn't?
Post #418495 23rd Apr 2015 8:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
Please dont tell me you cant think of some people that dont deserve to have rights
Post #418497 23rd Apr 2015 8:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 18 Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 595

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Sumatra Black
There are people who don't deserve human rights? Tell who you're talking about.
Post #418498 23rd Apr 2015 8:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20453

United Kingdom 
At the moment the richest have all the rights and that's about it.
And crime figures have now gone up just recently + 1 million food banks in 2015. Rolling Eyes

The EU in my book is mainly positive but there are a few pains I know.
We can't go backwards now, the trade we had in this country was destroyed by Thatcher in the 80's and that's why it lead in later years to join up with the EU.

When there has been benefits of being part of the EU when the
Somerset levels flooding occured they offered emergency funds for a disaster.
What happened, a certain someone refused to accept it and just let it happen and did nothing about it.
Farms underwater and cattle about to drown if it wasn't for swift action by the farmers down there.

But when the Thames flooded oh dear, major catastrophe!

UKIP and the current govt is a massive no no from me.

Each to their own of course and everyone has their rights of view providing it isn't in malice against others.

Thumbs Up

In 2008 the financial crash was a global problem caused by banks & bankers of which the IFS stated that NO govt could have prevented.
Of course this was the richest in the world again that caused this and now they want everyone but themselves to pay for it while they line their own nests with an extra estimated £100k a year better off.

The USA had similar problems but got over it far far quicker then over here.
And talkin of the U.S. I do not know why more trade isn't done with them anyway.
Post #418509 23rd Apr 2015 9:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mountain_man



Member Since: 09 Dec 2011
Location: Right side of Offas Dyke
Posts: 756

Wales 
I think you will find we were in the EEC before Thatcher came along!!

I also think you will find that for every pound we pay to the EU we get over half of it back in the form of subsidies to various indutries (Agriculture and associated rural development + admin, Nuclear industry, space programmes, research funding, objective 1 area aid funding) so it is not as much going out as UKIP would have us believe.

And as for EU rules and stuff, who do you think really invents them? There is not some group of faceless people sat in a closed room somewhere in Brussels brainstorming the next crazy thing to force upon the poor citizens of Europe.Rather it is a political reaction in response to pressure from industry, research establishments or powerful citizen-backed lobby groups.

However, it could just be the fact that the EU is quite keen to regulate the banking sector, something very close to Farage and his pals own hearts, that he really wants out. Not that he would admit to that.
Post #418521 23rd Apr 2015 9:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20453

United Kingdom 
What exactly are the EU farming subsidies for? Or are we talking about a multitude of things too many to mention. Laughing
Post #418529 23rd Apr 2015 10:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums