Home > Tdi > 300tdi boost |
|
|
newhue Member Since: 28 Apr 2014 Location: Brisbane Posts: 351 |
x1 My Defender and travels |
||
9th Oct 2014 4:30am |
|
Timo K Member Since: 23 Aug 2012 Location: Helsinki Posts: 171 |
I just did this mod to my 110. I have a fullsize Allisport IC and VNT bolt on turbo. There is definitely a slight difference. It still isn't a rocket ship, but during acceleration it seems to keep boosting longer when you lift off the throttle to change gear. Atleast in my case it made it feel more spritely and smoother. Previously I had trouble with long inclines, it always lost alot of speed, now I can actually accelerate uphill. To me it seems like an easy and worthwhile mod. This is my first impression anyway. Now done about 600km like this and have found nothing to complain about.
|
||
4th Nov 2014 9:36am |
|
galvernisednuts Member Since: 18 Oct 2013 Location: Cumbria Posts: 29 |
Really like the sound of this...
I'm running a big allard cooler and a new garret turbo wid silicone and stainless pipes My only worry is the inlet manifolds get quite gunked up internally and will this pass to the boost actuator or inj pump more readily over time? |
||
8th Nov 2014 1:30am |
|
Timo K Member Since: 23 Aug 2012 Location: Helsinki Posts: 171 |
I've a blanked off EGR but there is still a small amount of oily residue in the pipes and intake manifold. I don't think it's anything to worry about really. The pipes are easy to clean and/or replace and besides, you're looking at a closed loop system. Changing the boost pick-up point further down the line shouldn't make any real difference IMHO.
|
||
8th Nov 2014 7:55am |
|
galvernisednuts Member Since: 18 Oct 2013 Location: Cumbria Posts: 29 |
Is taking the boost from the turbo location cleaner than the inlet manifold?
I wonder if that's why the standard location was chosen I like the sound of this upgrade a lot but wonder if the actuator etc is going to be at more risk of contamination? |
||
16th Nov 2014 7:59pm |
|
Timo K Member Since: 23 Aug 2012 Location: Helsinki Posts: 171 |
No, the turbo is what's pushing the oily residue through in the first place. The further away you are from it then the less likely you are to see any of it. But in practise there's really no difference.
|
||
16th Nov 2014 8:32pm |
|
galvernisednuts Member Since: 18 Oct 2013 Location: Cumbria Posts: 29 |
Very good
I think I'll order a twin output banjo and bolt with washers, a brass T piece and then fit it along with a barbed Inline reducer for the boost pipe that supplies my gauge I've got an old turbo sitting so I'll pop to my local hydraulic specialist and get the turbo outlet blank sorted, they'll be able to check the thread size etc then I'll get my actual turbo blanked and modded I'm running a big allard cooler, tweek'd pump and a hybrid Tdi into Tdci exhaust Along with a minor pump timing advance it'll be interesting to see how this mod works |
||
16th Nov 2014 8:44pm |
|
MuddyChris300tdi Member Since: 02 Mar 2014 Location: Derby Posts: 224 |
If you remove the breather pipe from the air intake aswell as blanking the EGR there is no gunk to be pulled in and all stays spotless.
|
||
2nd Dec 2014 8:24pm |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8026 |
Hi guys, interesting thread, will look to try this on my tgv (just no wastegate to worry about) where did you get the manifold banjo fittings from? Cheers
James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
2nd Dec 2014 9:15pm |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8026 |
i was thinking about this
wastegate off the manifold i can follow so its doesnt open until it sees full boost achieved at manifold (ie closer to inlet) in essence then we are saying that if pressure is taken at turbo itself its a higher pressure than at the manifold. so surely FiP is better having that higher pressure sooner to get the pin to depress quicker? moving it to the manifold would make the FiP pressure feed lazy. Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
18th Dec 2014 7:34pm |
|
_Stingrey_ Member Since: 29 Jul 2015 Location: Wirral Merseyside Posts: 15 |
Could somebody post a how to guide for this mod?
|
||
29th Jul 2015 2:52pm |
|
Andy80 Member Since: 31 May 2013 Location: Essex Posts: 490 |
Whats the HP and torque figures with these mods? Working towards Carry on camping!
|
||
29th Jul 2015 5:07pm |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8026 |
it was on LR4x4 in the tech archive Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
29th Jul 2015 8:26pm |
|
Horneteer Member Since: 10 Feb 2015 Location: Cornwall Posts: 60 |
Hi Guys, I've been thinking about this mod and thought I'd do a little experiment.
I got two boost gauges, connected them together and synchronised them so they read the same, using a bicycle pump to control the pressure in the hose. One gauge was connected to the manifold using a banjo fitting as per the OP, and the other was connected into the wastegate/FIP connector at the turbo. The engine is an ex Disco 200Tdi in a 90, max boost is 15psi reached at 3000rpm and higher. The Results: Both gauges moved at the same rate and reading 90% of the time. On occasions the turbo gauge was 1 to 2 psi higher than the manifold gauge generally around the 5 to 12psi range. This difference didn't last long as when the turbo gauge stopped climbing the manifold gauge soon caught up.
I'm with jst on this point Conclusion: If you want to do this mod, and your butt dyno feels a difference, then go ahead and do it. Personally I think I'll leave mine as LR designed it. |
||
19th Oct 2015 7:48pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis