↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Anti-Stall
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17328

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Anti-stall works in all gears in both high and low, it doesn't however mean that you cannot stall the vehicle!

Idle jack works in low first only.
Post #252947 22nd Jul 2013 10:04am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 7992

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
JR wrote:
Sorry but I think you will find that anti stall works in 1st & reverse in Low box only.


not according to the Hub, LRE teaching or in my experience it doesnt Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #252991 22nd Jul 2013 12:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndyS



Member Since: 18 Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 595

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Sumatra Black
I've just driven the car up onto ramps in the normal box, first gear. It just rolled up the ramps no problem and no throttle. I guessed that was anti-stall doing it's thing?
Post #252996 22nd Jul 2013 12:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Simon27



Member Since: 30 Oct 2012
Location: East Lothian
Posts: 131

Scotland 2009 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Tamar Blue
I use anti-stall all the time to hi for pulling away. Saves reaching for the handbrake on hills and means I can pull away anywhere without over-revving.

You can also feel it in higher gears when breaking to slow down, and then right when I should dip the clutch, the engine accelerates to overcome the breaking.

I think there's something like idle jack working when in hi range too. You know when you've been running in low range, and then maybe a second after stopping you'll notice the engine revs drop as idle jack switches off? I've also noticed it when moving in traffic in high, then putting the gearbox into neutral (so no engine breaking), and just using the brakes to come to a halt. When the wheels stop turning, the revs drop by a small amount.
Post #253000 22nd Jul 2013 12:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17328

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Yes, the revs are held slightly higher when the vehicle is moveing, but I forget now the technical reason for this. This is independent of the idle jack, however, which is specifically to avoid loss-of-control when descending steep loose hills in low first when without the idle jack the engine braking would be excessive.
Post #253015 22nd Jul 2013 1:31pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dilukabey



Member Since: 17 May 2011
Location: Sri Lanka
Posts: 173

2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Keswick Green
Last week I drove in the beach side road with heavy sand with my 110 puma SW. First I used high range with diff locked at 1st gear and the car stalled few times under heavy sand. But when i used low range diff locked at 1st gear the car did not stall but i felt the engine revs too much to keep the momentum. I do not know this is something to do with anti stall?

What would be the most appropriate gear selection for puma engines on heavy sand tracks? Guys i need your opinion. Cheers. Appreciate!
Post #325273 22nd Apr 2014 10:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
timbar



Member Since: 30 Jul 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 245

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Simon27 wrote:
I use anti-stall all the time to hi for pulling away. Saves reaching for the handbrake on hills and means I can pull away anywhere without over-revving.


Is that the anti-stall? I recall my Dad's diesel Peugeot 505 pulling away quite happily with no throttle. 2009 110 XS Station Wagon
Post #325282 22nd Apr 2014 11:17am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Simon27



Member Since: 30 Oct 2012
Location: East Lothian
Posts: 131

Scotland 2009 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Tamar Blue
Quote:
Is that the anti-stall? I recall my Dad's diesel Peugeot 505 pulling away quite happily with no throttle.


Pretty sure it's working, even though the low rev torque is good on these engines. Works on the steepest of hills, and will even pull away in 2nd or higher, not that it would make the clutch too happy.

Keep your foot on the brake and you'll see the engine revs trying to overcome it.
Post #325292 22nd Apr 2014 12:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zone30



Member Since: 07 Sep 2012
Location: Gent
Posts: 669

Belgium 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Nara Bronze
dilukabey wrote:
Last week I drove in the beach side road with heavy sand with my 110 puma SW. First I used high range with diff locked at 1st gear and the car stalled few times under heavy sand. But when i used low range diff locked at 1st gear the car did not stall but i felt the engine revs too much to keep the momentum. I do not know this is something to do with anti stall?

What would be the most appropriate gear selection for puma engines on heavy sand tracks? Guys i need your opinion. Cheers. Appreciate!


If you can launch from a solid, try 3th low gear and enter at speed.
From soft ground, build up speed slowly or you'll dig yourself in.
When you loose momentum, de-clutch BEFORE you stand still or you will get stuck, continue with low first until you feel you can gear higher or you have a better footing.

Next time experiment a bit, soft sand is fun but tricky to drive on.
Post #325296 22nd Apr 2014 1:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dilukabey



Member Since: 17 May 2011
Location: Sri Lanka
Posts: 173

2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Keswick Green
Many thanks to the Zone30 for the valued feedback.

Also isn't it an advantage of using low range with 3rd gear to engage the anti stall (according to forum members)?

Also I have seen some forum members have suggested that without diff lock engaged the defenders drive easy on sand?
Post #325330 22nd Apr 2014 4:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cold_n_Wet



Member Since: 15 Oct 2012
Location: Bergen
Posts: 244

Norway 
Can Idle jack be removed, its a little to quick in reverse low when reversing in to tight places ?

I have a swedish instruction book and dont understand it. "Rafiki" 2007 110 STW - Rolling rebuild.
Post #325391 22nd Apr 2014 6:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17328

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
No.
Post #325520 22nd Apr 2014 10:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
yaho



Member Since: 26 Nov 2008
Location: Bialystok
Posts: 200

Poland 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Keswick Green
Quote:
Also I have seen some forum members have suggested that without diff lock engaged the defenders drive easy on sand?


Its worth to add here, that letting the air out from the tyres makes huge difference in sand driving. Janusz
www.yahodeville.com
Post #325538 23rd Apr 2014 7:05am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums