Home > Puma (Tdci) > 2.2 poor fuel economy |
|
|
keith Member Since: 15 Aug 2012 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 2214 |
Here is my latest tankfull miles .
1st fuelguage mark = 120 miles 2nd fuelguage mark = 200 miles 3rd fuelguage mark = 270 miles Alarm and light on = 315 miles Leaving an absoulute max of another 15 miles before total run out empty . Total = 315 miles and 70L to fill to brim . |
||
12th Feb 2014 3:10pm |
|
Morepower Member Since: 08 Jan 2013 Location: Fife, Scotland Posts: 630 |
Ummm... seems pretty bad that... Our 110 2013my Utility did around 380-400 miles when std (until the light came on) and now it's been modified around 370-390 miles now...
Cheers Tim It doesn't matter how bad it is, It can always get worse... 2013 Bowler 110 (Sold) 2016 Bowler 90 Rally Spec (Sold) |
||
18th Feb 2014 7:57am |
|
Marius Member Since: 21 Dec 2010 Location: South Africa Posts: 231 |
I get about 12 l/100 km with my 2.4. Bull bar, winch and roof rack fitted. Never got better than that really. Best was 11.5 l/100km I think.
|
||
18th Feb 2014 12:33pm |
|
Cuthbert Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: Up North Posts: 1535 |
Some wildly differing claims on this thread and a good mix of metric and imperial units just to make comparisons even more challenging .............
|
||
18th Feb 2014 8:53pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6300 |
Tim. Ive not done the maths but aren't you getting the same mpg?
|
||
18th Feb 2014 8:56pm |
|
Naks Member Since: 27 Jan 2009 Location: Stellenbosch, ZA Posts: 2645 |
Who are these muppets who refuse to join the 21st century? Marius, your figures look high - is that mostly town driving? -- 2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear 2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9 Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ |
||
19th Feb 2014 6:29am |
|
RockJaw Member Since: 15 Oct 2013 Location: United States Posts: 317 |
Ja swaar, that sounds about right for the old 2.4 - you should get around 600 kms before the thing stops and dies completely - if you lucky maybe 620-630 kms. But in the 2.2 you got to trap lightly boettie, else you going nowhere near 600 kms - more like 570 or thereabout! ****CENSORED**** |
||
20th Feb 2014 5:57pm |
|
Lewisgregory8 Member Since: 17 Sep 2012 Location: Durham Posts: 395 |
With my 90, I get between 290 and 320 miles per 50 litres
Driving at 65mph on longer journeys seems to be the best for fuel economy |
||
20th Feb 2014 6:52pm |
|
Morepower Member Since: 08 Jan 2013 Location: Fife, Scotland Posts: 630 |
Hi Caterham... Well nearly... I think I'm probably able to get more now, But I'm using the extra go to enjoy myself
Cheers Tim It doesn't matter how bad it is, It can always get worse... 2013 Bowler 110 (Sold) 2016 Bowler 90 Rally Spec (Sold) |
||
20th Feb 2014 11:31pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6300 |
'to enjoy yourself' and thats what its all about (so I'm told)
will hopefully know all about it next week |
||
21st Feb 2014 7:07am |
|
RustyM Member Since: 28 Oct 2013 Location: Africa/The Med Posts: 222 |
Defender & MPG into the same sentence still makes me chuckle! Sorry I do not want to offend but had to say it, it's the devil inside....
That said I have no idea what MPG I get but I get around 350 miles to a 110 tank with 4,000 +miles on the clock. Mine went from UK dealer to Africa via me behind the wheel and touch wood all apart from a noisy thrust bearing and rear door trim poping off all is well Good old JLR! So hence my chuckle about MPG as all I need to know is range Oh and yes my 2.2 sounds like a bag of spanners on tick over and acceleration.... low revs driving is now a fine art I have yet to master due to fly by wire I guess! 90 & Wolf 110 XS Previously owned SI SII SIIa SIII & Light weight (air portable) |
||
21st Feb 2014 8:59pm |
|
milesr3 Member Since: 12 Feb 2013 Location: Suffolk Posts: 873 |
Mine did 356 miles to the fuel warning light yesterday and took 65 litres to fill, which works out at 25mpg.
I've been measuring it over the last few weeks, have tried it with/without Millers and tried different tyre pressures on the back axle and none if it makes a significant difference to the fuel economy; I'm typically seeing 24-27mpg. |
||
23rd Feb 2014 11:33am |
|
maar10 Member Since: 02 Feb 2014 Location: ZH Posts: 52 |
I don't care about mileage. But when i want to know what "normal" behaviour can do i take a look at: https://www.spritmonitor.de/en/overview/25...owerunit=2
|
||
23rd Feb 2014 8:43pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6300 |
I thought the modern car (in this case the 2.2) had improved economy as with all modern cars / drivers.........
I think I know why......everybody cuts corners / drives on the wrong bl##dy side of the road!!! ...perhaps this should be in the grumpy thread? |
||
7th May 2014 6:05pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis