DEFENDER2.NET - View topic - 265/75/16's on Stock 110 suspension ?

↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > 265/75/16's on Stock 110 suspension ?

Page 2 of 2

Print this entire topic ·

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17661

2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey

scottish110 wrote:

Would it work without the 30mm spacer or would the turning circle not be as good ?

With 285s on Boosts but without the spacers, the turning circle is ideal for orbitting small planets but not much else (see also Pom's post above).

You can live with it, but negotiating car parks, and even some mini roundabouts, can be interesting and it really isn't convenient. With spacers, the original tunring circle is restored and there are really no adverse effects.

Be aware that with 285 MTs - especially with spacers - the outside of your truck will get covered in crud like never before. If you are a clean truck person, don't do it! if you think it looks better with mud, go for it, but keep the windows shut off-road!

15th Nov 2011 3:45pm

MuddyMarky

Member Since: 01 Feb 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 548

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey

My experience of 285's on the 90 was good overall. Now got them on my 110 and pretty much as pleased. My turning circle doesn't seem to have been too badly affected......they're not great in that department as it is though!

Mark
2011 110 XS DC
Stornoway Grey

15th Nov 2011 3:59pm

scottish110

Member Since: 10 Nov 2011
Location: Inverurie
Posts: 363

2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black

blackwolf wrote:
scottish110 wrote:

Would it work without the 30mm spacer or would the turning circle not be as good ?

Be aware that with 285 MTs - especially with spacers - the outside of your truck will get covered in crud like never before. If you are a clean truck person, don't do it! if you think it looks better with mud, go for it, but keep the windows shut off-road!

Hmmm, ok i think the 265's will be the way to go then

! So would you recomend using a spacer with them ?

15th Nov 2011 4:09pm

scottish110

Member Since: 10 Nov 2011
Location: Inverurie
Posts: 363

Guys, what would you say about getting extended bump stops ? Seen a few people talking about getting them when they got a bigger tyre size ?

15th Nov 2011 4:10pm

scottish110

Member Since: 10 Nov 2011
Location: Inverurie
Posts: 363

MuddyMarky wrote:
scottish110 wrote:
Think 285's would stick out to wide guys ?

A couple of pics of the 285 BFG muds on my 90 in my gallery chap.

Pretty sweet 90

! Nice pooch too

! Im going to have to think about getting some sort of ramp for my two so they can get into the back

15th Nov 2011 4:13pm

T1G UP

Member Since: 08 Dec 2009
Location: Bath
Posts: 3101

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Orkney Grey

MuddyMarky wrote:
I had 285's on Boosts on my 90 and didn't get any rubbing etc at all.

i had the same et up on my td5 90.

Guess whats going on the 110

15th Nov 2011 4:22pm

robpenrose

Member Since: 15 Jan 2011
Location: Hampshire or Cornwall
Posts: 338

Some picyures in my gallery with 265s on my 90. Didnt need to adjust bump stops.

Speedo is very slightly out by a couple of mph...

No Spacers, Boost Alloys. BFG ATs

Ideal IMHO Current:D4 HSE
Gone: BMW Z4MC
Gone: Defender TD5 90 CSW
Previous: Discovery TD5 ES (Gone)

15th Nov 2011 4:56pm

mick

Member Since: 08 Feb 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2109

2010 Defender 130 Puma 2.4 HCPU Rimini Red

I am on 265 on Blindos with no issues

15th Nov 2011 8:05pm

LandRoverAnorak

Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

scottish110 wrote:
blackwolf wrote:
Be aware that with 285 MTs - especially with spacers - the outside of your truck will get covered in crud like never before. If you are a clean truck person, don't do it! if you think it looks better with mud, go for it, but keep the windows shut off-road!

Hmmm, ok i think the 265's will be the way to go then ! So would you recomend using a spacer with them ?

It's the same with 265's on spacers

scottish110 wrote:
Guys, what would you say about getting extended bump stops ? Seen a few people talking about getting them when they got a bigger tyre size ?

That would only be necessary for larger diameter tyres. 265/76/16's are essentially the same diameter as standard 235/85/16's. Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia

15th Nov 2011 9:59pm

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17661

Personally I wouldn't use spacers with 265s but would (and do) with 285s.

Not sure why you would want to extend the bump stops unless you've lifted the suspension - you'd just reduce suspension travel.

15th Nov 2011 10:54pm

BIGFOG

Member Since: 12 Sep 2010
Location: Edenbridge
Posts: 537

2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey

scottish110 wrote:
BIGFOG wrote:
scottish110 wrote:
BIGFOG wrote:
Ive got Coopers on Silverline rims, 0 offset and they are also fine, even at full articulation.

Got any pictures mate ?

Course!

Click image to enlarge

Really works well the black on grey.... Is your exhaust coming through the body on the side ?

Yes it's a side exit exhaust, full SS system from Twisted Performance. Sounds lovely!!

Admin note: this post has had its images recovered from a money grabbing photo hosting site and reinstated

17th Nov 2011 3:11pm

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17661

robpenrose wrote:
Some picyures in my gallery with 265s on my 90. Didnt need to adjust bump stops.

Speedo is very slightly out by a couple of mph...

No Spacers, Boost Alloys. BFG ATs

Ideal IMHO

Interesting, with 285s on my 110 my speedo seems to be as close to spot on as I can measure (both timing off motorway distance markers and with a radar gun at a fixed object).

The effective rolling diameters of a 265/75 and a 235/85 are so similar as to make a negligible difference (the 265/75 is actually smaller than the stock 235/85) so if anything the speedo (on a 110 at least) should under-read more than before with 265/75s.

The 285/75 is approx 5% larger than the 235/85 and is would be highly unusual for a modern speedo to be accurate to +0%/-5%, i.e., to over-read by less than 5% anyway (since manufacturers are allowed to over-read by up to 10% but not to under-read at all, all speedos tend to over-read by around 5%). The result of this is that with 285s my speedo seems to be very accurate indeed.

Is a 90 speedo calibrated differently to a 110? I presume that it must be set up for smaller tyres.

Can this be reprogrammed with nanocom/BBS etc?

17th Nov 2011 4:00pm

Page 2 of 2

All times are GMT

Jump to

< Previous Topic | Next Topic >

Posting Rules

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum