Home > Puma (Tdci) > Puma tdci fuel economy improvements |
|
|
Badger110 Member Since: 06 Feb 2018 Location: South hams Posts: 1039 |
Interesting you went for a transit remap...what was the output etc?
|
||
3rd Feb 2019 5:08pm |
|
Cupboard Member Since: 21 Mar 2014 Location: Suffolk Posts: 2971 |
16MPG? There's something seriously wrong there, you should be getting about twice that.
Mine's a 2.4 but over the last 3 fill ups it's averaged 31MPG. It's happier when running on premium and in the summer, but 31 on cheap diesel in winter is about right for me. |
||
3rd Feb 2019 6:24pm |
|
lordackers Member Since: 05 Dec 2018 Location: Leeds Posts: 47 |
fab.rob, that's thinking outside the box, I'd never had thought about a transit remap specialist, I'll watch your post with interest and see how you get on with it
|
||
3rd Feb 2019 6:32pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
you might be right about it being a transit engine but the rest of the drive train isn't which might explain why the LR map isn't the same as the transit map.
I'm not suggesting it won't work but you have to ask why it was changed in the first instance? |
||
4th Feb 2019 9:43am |
|
lordackers Member Since: 05 Dec 2018 Location: Leeds Posts: 47 |
That's a fair point Caterham, but will be interesting to see with a long term test?
|
||
4th Feb 2019 10:25am |
|
bankz5152 Member Since: 02 Feb 2017 Location: South London/North Kent Posts: 2166 |
That just doesnt seem wise to me. While the engine may well be the same there are a huge amount of things that are not the same.
Pumas should get roughly 25 - 30mpg on average. Fitting a larger IC wont change the MPG much either, not enough to save you £500 in fuel anyway. Instagram @defender_ventures Empire Tuning - Agent |
||
4th Feb 2019 10:26am |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
again I'm not suggesting it's going to make a world of difference but I understand torq is limited by varying amounts in the lower gears with full torq only available in 4,5 and 6th.
I also believe there's gear harmonisation which relates smoothing out gear changes which works with the clutch switch. will this be the same for a front wheel drive and 4 wheel drive? again I'm not suggesting these are game changers but it does point towards a transit map not being ideal for a defender? |
||
4th Feb 2019 10:30am |
|
fab.rob Member Since: 03 Nov 2018 Location: Wokingham Posts: 29 |
I say it was a transit map, it was a map that was developed by them for Defender but thay had a great deal of experience with transits. And as I say the price was right in as much as it was not the huge sums the likes of alive were charging (just because they have done a large number of new defenders off of the production line})
|
||
4th Feb 2019 8:00pm |
|
bankz5152 Member Since: 02 Feb 2017 Location: South London/North Kent Posts: 2166 |
Not seen Dynachip or TD5inside? £250 or less Instagram @defender_ventures
Empire Tuning - Agent |
||
4th Feb 2019 8:12pm |
|
Likeomg Member Since: 29 Jun 2012 Location: Lake District / Newcastle Posts: 2640 |
I really don't think a map removing a roof rack would see that much significant gains...
before mapping id of checked everything over and made sure the car was 100% before mapping. |
||
4th Feb 2019 8:15pm |
|
Sulisuli Member Since: 30 Oct 2016 Location: South west Posts: 4795 |
Certainly massive gains there for two simple mods..... 2015 HT XS 90
2008 SVX 90 2000 XS TD5 90 |
||
4th Feb 2019 8:19pm |
|
grafty99 Member Since: 15 Aug 2012 Location: North Devon Posts: 4785 |
Something definitely wrong with 16mpg (unless driven on the speed limiter everywhere with 15 psi in the tyres.) 2002 90 Td5 Station Wagon
1990 Vogue SE Triumph Tiger Explorer 1200 Td5 90 Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic50767.html Tdi 110 Thread https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic69562.html RRC Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic54492.html Instagram http://www.instagram.com/george_grafton |
||
4th Feb 2019 9:11pm |
|
fab.rob Member Since: 03 Nov 2018 Location: Wokingham Posts: 29 |
Don't know what to tell you guys but the s the figures. I did also add about 5 psi to tyres all round so now sitting at around 38psi
|
||
4th Feb 2019 10:13pm |
|
diduan Member Since: 13 Oct 2016 Location: Central Balkan Posts: 260 |
I know this is an old thread but I am having significant improvement of fuel consumption recently. Usually my 110SW was always at about 25-26 mpg. The last few full tanks have brought me at 30-31 mpg. I can't tell the exact reason because I did change few things since lockdown.
1. Air filter mod - great thing, I drive more in low rpms as it just has the power. 2. Switched the gas station from Shell to independent with LiquiMolly additive. Defender 110 SW MY2011 2.4tdci decat, no EGR Jeep Wrangler YJ 1990 4.0. Front 78' Dana 60, Rear CUCV 14 bolt |
||
25th Aug 2020 7:25pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis