↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Technical > Question re. hub nuts, FRC8700
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17386

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Question re. hub nuts, FRC8700
Back in 1947 when LR designed the first fully-floating hub, the design included opposed taper-roller wheel-bearings retained and adjusted by means of two nuts (an adjuster nut and a lock nut) with a malleable lock washer between them. This arrangement lasted to 1998 (I believe), when for obscure and undisclosed reasons (undoubtedly involving cost, or the reduction thereof) the design was changed to use a selective spacer between the bearings and a single stake nut.

The original hub nuts were designed to take a standard size box spanner, and the most appropriate size was 1.1/4 BSW or 1.3/8 BSF (which are, of course, the same), which equates to approx 2.1/16" or 52mm across flats. Few people nowadays know that the hubs nuts are not actually 52mm but actually a BSW size!

The post-98 stake nut helpfully retained the same AF dimension, so the same size tool fits it.

The reason for this long-winded bit of history is this: Some time ago I purchased from a well-known online retailer some "Genuine LR" old-style hub nuts, p/n FRC8700. They arrived without LR branded packaging (always a worrying sign) but the supplier assured me that this was because they come in bulk backs which the retailer splits. They appear genuine, individually wrapped in rust-preventative paper, BUT, to my surprise, they are only 50mm or 2" across flats.

So my question is this, have genuine plain nub nuts become smaller? It seems unlikely, since it means that the "standard" sized tooling can't be used. Also, the stake nut type are definitely still dimensioned for a 52mm spanner. Is this another economy measure and if so when did it start? Or have I been royally ripped off and supplied with items usually packaged in blue boxes?

Has anyone bought a bona-fide FRC8700 from a dealer recently, and if so, what size was it?

Any answers and insights gratefully received!



As a total aside, it strikes me as a bit unsatisfactory that the wheel-bearings on a late-spec Defender, which may have a GVW up to 3500kgs, are in fact SMALLER than those on an original Series 1, with its much more modest spec! That's progress!
Post #632237 19th Jun 2017 1:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ramsay



Member Since: 30 Sep 2015
Location: Moffat, Dumfries & Galloway
Posts: 627

Scotland 1995 Defender 110 300 Tdi CSW Auto Keswick Green
No size change that I can see. So whether Blue box or LR I suspect a batch that have been made metric 50mm not 52 mm / 2.1/6".

As to bearings, there has been progress. Better steels has increased like for like loads. So a smaller bearing now can do job of a larger bearing in the past. But not vice versa something to remember if using old stock bearings. 1995 Defender 110 CSW
1971 SIIA Lightweight
Post #632272 19th Jun 2017 2:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums