↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Wheels & Tyres > How good are ZU-Rims?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
leeds wrote:
It does raise the question why someone would go looking at the share structure of the company.

For the same sorts of reason you have looked at and commented on company data:
leeds wrote:
According to Company Check HERE Mr Purchase is not an active director but has been the director of 5 dissolved companies

http://www.defender2.net/forum/post489360....any#489360

After all, I know it upsets a certain site sponsor when people post things on the internet as fact when it is not:
leeds wrote:
Also there is a BIG difference between a company being a sole distributor of an item and a company being the manufacturer.

The trouble is when people read inaccurate statements on sites such as Face book they believe them because it is on the internet!

OK rant over, soap box away Razz

Brendan

http://www.defender2.net/forum/post480882....any#480882
Post #507264 23rd Feb 2016 11:35am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
leeds



Member Since: 28 Dec 2009
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 8580
United Kingdom 
OH DEAR, OH DEAR,OH DEAR


Guess where I have just been collecting stock?


Now I realise what I am about to type I can not readily prove, so people will have to take me at my word or not as they see fit!

I was speaking to 50% of the directors of both WVA Holdings Ltd and Zu Rims Ltd and asked him directly about the share holders of Zu Rims Ltd.

The shares of Zu Rims Ltd are 100% owned by the two directors. Company House records have not updated the shareholders record for over 3 years now.

Now I realise I can not PROVE that statement however I am personally willing to accept the word of one of the directors of that company.


So moral of the story? Just because it is on the internet/official record it does not make it correct/100%accurate or up to date!


So getting back to the original point of this thread, YES I am personally happy with the QUALITY AND REPUTATION of Zu Rims



Brendan
Post #507269 23rd Feb 2016 12:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
TACK



Member Since: 26 Apr 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 1045
 
Leeds, as you mates with them, I am looking at buying a set of ZU's for a defender, what the price for 4 in anthracite and how much for a 5th Wink

Thanks TACK
Post #507272 23rd Feb 2016 12:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
rustyboxx



Member Since: 08 Oct 2012
Location: Poole
Posts: 548
United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Montalcino Red
^^^^ Opportunist Laughing 2015 90 XS CSW TDCi - Beautiful
2007 110 XS DCPU - An itch that needed scratching
2005 90 Td5 XS CSW - Utterly brilliant
2001 Discovery 2 ES Auto - A phase I went through
1996 90 Tdi CSW - Uber reliable
1989 90 2.5 Petrol Hardtop - My first proper Landy
1985 Range Rover Vogue V8 -Troublesome
Post #507291 23rd Feb 2016 1:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
leeds wrote:
The shares of Zu Rims Ltd are 100% owned by the two directors. Company House records have not updated the shareholders record for over 3 years now.

Now I realise I can not PROVE that statement however I am personally willing to accept the word of one of the directors of that company.


I'll reply without the amateur dramatics...

Well that's very odd Whistle

If they are using the Webfiling Annual Return process then the changes they report are automatic - a fact you must know as your company uses this service yourself.

"The Annual Return will display the latest details held at Companies House. If these details are changed to reflect the position at the time of the made-up date, you will not just be updating the Annual Return, you will also change the details held on Companies House records."

and when you check the actual records the last electronic filing was made on 29th January 2016 and received for filing on 4th February 2016.

This details 4 shares, two of which are NOT held by your friends:


Click image to enlarge

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company...ng-history

so it looks like they made an error in this submission - multiple times? Confused

It does however prove you to be wrong, again, in stating:
leeds wrote:
Company House records have not updated the shareholders record for over 3 years now.

a very simple fact you could have checked before posting it up on here and becoming one of those people you rant about:
leeds wrote:
The trouble is when people read inaccurate statements on sites such as Face book they believe them because it is on the internet!
OK rant over, soap box away Razz
Brendan
Post #507331 23rd Feb 2016 3:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
claydiggermud



Member Since: 11 Jul 2015
Location: west country
Posts: 86
United Kingdom 2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Tamar Blue
These are my white zu alloys

Click image to enlarge
Post #508202 25th Feb 2016 7:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018
United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
leeds wrote:
OH DEAR, OH DEAR,OH DEAR


and again...



Rolling with laughter

I hope you inform your friends of the inconsistency on their company record as:

"If you do nothing we may publicly mark up the company or LLP record as inconsistent. This will be visible to any person searching your record.

If you continue to do nothing the registrar may ultimately issue a notice to resolve the inconsistency. If you do not respond to it within 14 days then the company and every officer who is in default may be guilty of an offense and liable for a fine."

leeds wrote:
So moral of the story?

Care to update this?
Post #508680 27th Feb 2016 11:13am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
TACK



Member Since: 26 Apr 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 1045
 
I don't mind updating.

Didn't get a price, so bought from paddocks all fitted this morning along with a few other Naka goodies, thawing out now Wink
Post #508743 27th Feb 2016 3:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
TACK



Member Since: 26 Apr 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 1045
 

Click image to enlarge
Post #509068 28th Feb 2016 6:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Paul K



Member Since: 01 Dec 2013
Location: St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Posts: 62
United States 1985 Defender 90 V8 Petrol SW Auto Portofino Red
I presume ZU rims are strong enough to handle 300BHP?
Post #772486 10th May 2019 3:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grouse



Member Since: 16 Apr 2012
Location: on the hill
Posts: 520
I would worry about the rest of the vehicle and drive train before the ZU’s Very Happy Thumbs Up
Post #772501 10th May 2019 4:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT

Jump to  
<  Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums