Home > Defender Celebration Series & Classic Works > My 90 Heritage HT.....cancelled. |
|
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
T&C's - just for info. As I say, not interested in taking a legal route.
https://www.defender2.net/gallery/albums/u...6C_s~0.pdf |
||
27th Aug 2015 7:20am |
|
Venomator Member Since: 25 Aug 2014 Location: Peterborough Posts: 2087 |
As with most, if not all, others of this ilk, totally unfair and one sided and, given any contract in the eyes of the law must be fair and reasonable (to both parties equally), these would be simply chucked out at the commencement of any legal proceedings on that basis...
The only reason they get away with it is a: because nobody ever bothers to challenge them and b: they have, in all probability, never been challenged through the legal system... The reality is, before signing any such purportedly legal, and in this case seemingly totally worthless, document, we should all take legal advice, but I guarantee nobody ever does... Rog... The GREEN One... MY2016 Urban Truck Build Thread - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic40548....al[/color] |
||
27th Aug 2015 8:18am |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
No availability. |
||
27th Aug 2015 8:38am |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
Hot off the press...
Cardiff are now admitting to an admin error! |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:11pm |
|
Vintagepaul Member Since: 20 Jan 2015 Location: Rye, East Sussex Posts: 482 |
So it was the dealer at fault then.....
I hope they manage to get your order re-instated as it seems particularly unfair if you have to suffer due to their cock up. |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:14pm |
|
steve E Member Since: 06 Mar 2011 Location: Tenby Posts: 2073 |
Thats not good at all.
I'll be receiving the same phone call probably well I hope they get you something with a huge discount then. |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:17pm |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
Will wait and see. I doubt it's that simple. |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:18pm |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
I'd hope you'd have been advised already if yours was in jeopardy? |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:34pm |
|
steve E Member Since: 06 Mar 2011 Location: Tenby Posts: 2073 |
I really do hope they come back to you with your Heritage HT or a proper deal on an alternative Defender
|
||
27th Aug 2015 2:41pm |
|
Supacat Member Since: 16 Oct 2012 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 11018 |
Well that had to be the favourite explanation from the get go. Easy to blame JLR and hope it stopped there. Hope the person who thought it was OK to lie to you is being hauled over the coals for it.
Keep the pr guy involved to get the best possible options / offers placed on the table. Good luck. |
||
27th Aug 2015 2:48pm |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
Thanks guys.
|
||
27th Aug 2015 4:54pm |
|
Venomator Member Since: 25 Aug 2014 Location: Peterborough Posts: 2087 |
Not entirely sure what this means, but I sincerely hope they can address it in the only decent way for you and ensure your order is fully complied with... Good luck with the 'negotiations' and I'm sure you will keep us posted... Rog... The GREEN One... MY2016 Urban Truck Build Thread - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic40548....al[/color] |
||
27th Aug 2015 6:19pm |
|
m33ufo Member Since: 19 Jan 2008 Location: Cardiff Posts: 1150 |
You're right, it wasn't very clear. It appears that the reason Stratstone aren't getting me a car is because there was an admin error with the order (reading between the lines). Not JLR's fault at all. Still waiting to hear of my options from the dealer. |
||
27th Aug 2015 7:06pm |
|
Venomator Member Since: 25 Aug 2014 Location: Peterborough Posts: 2087 |
Not so, what is actually very wrong is, again, taking extracts from statements out of context and making a meal of them to suit! My reference to interchangeability of names was not suggesting one swap the names of participants in any particular contract, it was in reference to my own use of JLR, instead of Squealer, which you had queried and perhaps I had failed to elucidate well enough... Even I am not stupid enough to think one can change the names of parties to a contract for heaven's sake and to suggest so is utterly ridiculous...
Headings may well be for convenience, but the clause in question is clearly intended to be FM based. I would be surprised if the entire clause would not, therefore, qualify as being FM, and yet there is no clear definition for this eventuality.
Each of us is perfectly entitled to interpret such things as we see fit, or may be comfortable with! But any such document, or term within it, is only fair if the courts have ruled it as so. Of course, if this particular clause, or even the conveniently extracted statement from it, has been tested through our illustrious legal system and held to be fair then it must be so! However, just because someone suggests it is a fair term, certainly does not make it so, and many have made that mistake. If the term were to be totally unconnected to any FM reference, with some less dubious wording, it may well be held to be fair, if it were ever challenged. My comments related to including any such get out clause within, or associated with an FM umbrella, as FM is, or should be, a clearly defined term, as recognised in law. @m33ufo - Apologies for taking this discussion, somewhat unnecessarily, so far off topic! Please feel to request Martin to remove this and any related stuff if it offends you... Rog... The GREEN One... MY2016 Urban Truck Build Thread - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic40548....al[/color] |
||
31st Aug 2015 2:31pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis