↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > LED Rear pack without lamp guards vs traditional with?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
mountaingoat



Member Since: 16 Jan 2015
Location: London
Posts: 4

United Kingdom 
LED Rear pack without lamp guards vs traditional with?
Any thoughts which way to go based on practicals or cosmetics? Front guards ordered for 110. Rear guards incompatible with LEDs. Revert back to rear traditional lighting with guards or just stick with the LR LED pack? Grateful for your kind input.
Post #404253 3rd Mar 2015 9:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Go Beyond



Member Since: 30 Jan 2012
Location: Headcorn, Kent
Posts: 6677

United Kingdom 
Personally I love the look of the SVX rear LED pack and have them in my 90.

I think the standard rest light guards cause more damage, if hit, to the body work than would be suffered if they weren't there in the first place.
Post #404264 3rd Mar 2015 10:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Cheshire110



Member Since: 26 Jul 2013
Location: Cheshire/London
Posts: 2743

United Kingdom 
i agree with the above.

Seen a couple of defenders where lamp guards turned a broken light unit to a collapsed rear corner.

Also they quickly end up rusty and get electrolytic corrosion around the drill hole.

And they mean you can't have a decent sized spare, etc etc....


i fancy some LED rears but don't like the bolt on bits type, really like the SVX ones. On my list Thumbs Up Cheers, David
Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8.
Post #404278 3rd Mar 2015 10:37pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mountaingoat



Member Since: 16 Jan 2015
Location: London
Posts: 4

United Kingdom 
Many thanks to both of you. v helpful.

MG
Post #404597 4th Mar 2015 11:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
grafty99



Member Since: 15 Aug 2012
Location: North Devon
Posts: 4785

United Kingdom 2002 Defender 90 Td5 HT Caledonian Blue
I agree, replacement standard lamps are so cheap I wouldn't bother protecting them, better a broken lense than a bent wing Thumbs Up 2002 90 Td5 Station Wagon
1990 Vogue SE
Triumph Tiger Explorer 1200
Td5 90 Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic50767.html
Tdi 110 Thread https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic69562.html
RRC Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic54492.html
Instagram http://www.instagram.com/george_grafton
Post #404609 4th Mar 2015 11:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shaggydog



Member Since: 12 Aug 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 3347

United Kingdom 1991 Defender 110 200 Tdi USW Arles Blue
I agree.

I have Wolf Style guards on the front but nothing on the back as the rear is so much more susceptible to damage due to the lack of bumpers! A plastic lens costs pennies whereas a new tub is much more expensive.

That said, I would always fit them to the front. Mine have had some serious knocks in her life from stones or falling debris while driving or working and they have always protected my lights from damage. They are also quite handy for hanging things off while working like gloves or chainsaw chains or hooks and chains. Plus they do act as another layer of defence against theft on later models! Running Restoration Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/post323197.html#323197

Self confessed mileage hunter Very Happy
Post #404611 4th Mar 2015 11:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bpman



Member Since: 21 May 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 8069

2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SVX Station Wagon Santorini Black
+ 1 for SVX LEDs - but use security screws - some cases of them being removed

If you go with standard ones, Personally I would not bother with guards they can cost most than a couple of quid for a lense
Post #404625 5th Mar 2015 8:19am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dgardel



Member Since: 30 Nov 2008
Location: Veneto (Heart & Head)
Posts: 3586

Italy 
Why not JWS?


Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge


Admin note: this post has had its images recovered from a money grabbing photo hosting site and reinstated Mr. Green  Discovery 5 td6 HSE Stornoway Gray Outback Engineering Limited Edition

IID Pro MV License
Post #404705 5th Mar 2015 12:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Martin
Site Admin


Member Since: 02 Apr 2007
Location: Hook Norton
Posts: 6582

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Montalcino Red
Another option:


Click image to enlarge
  1988 90 Td5 NAS soft top
2015 D90 XS SW
Post #404711 5th Mar 2015 1:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums