 | Home > Tdi > Millers vs 2SO |
 
|
|
|
the debate on using 2SO but am just interested in how they compare to each other from those of you out there that have tried both.
| K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610   
|
If you put 'Millers' into the search facility and myself as the author it comes up with 8 threads. I have used both Millers and 2SO on the odd occasion when Millers hasn't been available and/or I've run out. The only discernable difference in my opinion is that with 2SO the engine runs a little quieter on tickover.
This is just an opinion but I personally think Millers is better as it is 'manufactured for purpose' and I have used it for nearly four years without any adverse engine symptoms. Boils down to personal choice I think. If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
2nd Dec 2012 9:01am |
|
| LR90XS2011 Member Since: 05 Apr 2011 Location: bickenhill Posts: 3641 
|
Ive used both for extended periods previously in a 2.0 TDCI mondeo 130 BHP 2003 Model
my feelings are the Millers makes the engine feel stronger and more revvy which you might expect as it says it increases the cetane value of the fuel, I found myself thrashing it everywhere as a result , with regards to the 2SO I feel it makes the engine feels smoother and quieter but it could all of course be the placebo effect, Id say try them both independently for a couple of months and then decide for yourself, I certainly cant express any negative effects of using high quality 2SO as Ive used it in low doses in every petrol and diesel engine Ive had for the past 30 years and never seen a failure around pistons valves, bearings or fuel systems DEFENDER 90 TDCI XS, I hope everyone is well and your land rovers make you happy |
||
|
2nd Dec 2012 9:15am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
