DEFENDER2.NET - View topic - Pics not suitable viewing for the flat Earthers

↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In

Home > General & Technical (L663) > Pics not suitable viewing for the flat Earthers

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

Page 2 of 5

Print this entire topic ·

Setok

Member Since: 16 Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 422

Zagato wrote:
According to an article In LRO they are moving the recovery points (whatever you call them - just for show points!) as the designers haven't a clue about such things and I think they were advised that they need to be more central - those advisers should have designed it They will only be used to hold flowers anyway so no bigee

Actually, that's one core thing: why not get the engineers to design it? Form follows function. That would be more true to the Defender's roots.

5th Apr 2012 3:07pm

Setok

Member Since: 16 Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 422

AndrewS wrote:
Dont forget its a concept

This has been repeated quite often in the argument, but many recent concepts have ended up looking quite close to the final product.

With the amount of material LR is putting out, I think that is what will be the case here. Though it is very weird to be showing a short wheelbase version when the majority (by far) of Defenders sold outside the UK are 110s. For good reason, too.

5th Apr 2012 3:10pm

22900013A

Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3150

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Keswick Green

Setok wrote:
AndrewS wrote:
Dont forget its a concept

This has been repeated quite often in the argument, but many recent concepts have ended up looking quite close to the final product.

With the amount of material LR is putting out, I think that is what will be the case here. Though it is very weird to be showing a short wheelbase version when the majority (by far) of Defenders sold outside the UK are 110s. For good reason, too.

I'd say the 110 sells better in the UK as well, based on what one sees out and about on the roads, the 90s really are quite tiny by modern standards.

5th Apr 2012 3:29pm

pom

Member Since: 01 Jun 2010
Location: Worcester
Posts: 1343

110/130 is going to be a disco by the looks.

Pom

5th Apr 2012 4:37pm

BigMike

Member Since: 13 Jul 2010
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 2253

I think Andrew said flat earthers need not apply.

Trust me, all you whingers will be having one eventually, I guarantee it.

5th Apr 2012 4:47pm

dnorrishill

Member Since: 15 Jul 2011
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 617

2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Aintree Green

BigMike wrote:
I think Andrew said flat earthers need not apply.

Trust me, all you whingers will be having one eventually, I guarantee it.

Well I actually don't mind it, it's just not a defender and it's more like too many other vehicles (see Skoda Yeti for details) to have any real "character".

5th Apr 2012 5:23pm

AndrewS

Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3709

2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 SW Rimini Red

Setok wrote:
AndrewS wrote:
Dont forget its a concept

This has been repeated quite often in the argument, but many recent concepts have ended up looking quite close to the final product.

With the amount of material LR is putting out, I think that is what will be the case here. Though it is very weird to be showing a short wheelbase version when the majority (by far) of Defenders sold outside the UK are 110s. For good reason, too.

My Concept remark was in reply to the comment about the front recovery points.

Zagato wrote:
According to an article In LRO they are moving the recovery points (whatever you call them - just for show points!) as the designers haven't a clue about such things and I think they were advised that they need to be more central - those advisers should have designed it They will only be used to hold flowers anyway so no bigee

AndrewS wrote:
Dont forget its a concept

BigMike I knew they would infiltrate this thread

130's have feeling's as well you know

5th Apr 2012 5:23pm

Zagato
Site Supporter

Member Since: 08 Jan 2011
Location: Billingshurst West Sussex
Posts: 5013

Yes Martin could do with setting up a Dick100 site but their is always the Freelander site in the meantime

5th Apr 2012 5:35pm

RLD

Member Since: 29 Jun 2007
Location: Lancs
Posts: 858

If i were still working full time i would be having a 130 one

RLD fabricator of Hidden Winch Mount for D3/4 roof racks jerry can holders CB aerial mounts and much more and agent for Helsport Tents and gear

5th Apr 2012 5:54pm

AndrewS

Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3709

Zagato wrote:
Yes Martin could do with setting up a Dick100 site but their is always the Freelander site in the meantime

This site is for the New Defender 130's have feeling's as well you know

5th Apr 2012 6:50pm

RLD

Member Since: 29 Jun 2007
Location: Lancs
Posts: 858

Andrew tell them

RLD fabricator of Hidden Winch Mount for D3/4 roof racks jerry can holders CB aerial mounts and much more and agent for Helsport Tents and gear

5th Apr 2012 7:01pm

discocuzzy

Member Since: 16 Jul 2008
Location: surrey
Posts: 1200

Long wheelbase version to follow, the Discovery may also be replaced as well I.e defender and Disco both go.
Freelander, rangie sport and full fat to get 7 seats, Dc will be poverty spec on coils as a base/farmer/ builder spec up to a more sophisticated version for the leisure market, leather, air, auto etc.

Defender will be made for the scumbag 3rd world/people that can't move with the times market and made in Inda to a price alongside its sister vehice, the Tata

flap. You cannot teach stupid people to do clever things

5th Apr 2012 8:43pm

22900013A

Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3150

BigMike wrote:
I think Andrew said flat earthers need not apply.

Trust me, all you whingers will be having one eventually, I guarantee it.

I most certainly will not be buying one, EVER.

5th Apr 2012 9:08pm

22900013A

Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3150

RLD wrote:
If i were still working full time i would be having a 130 one

No you won't cos they ain't going to build one, sorry, Landrover don't like working people buying their products.

5th Apr 2012 9:13pm

22900013A

Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3150

discocuzzy wrote:
Long wheelbase version to follow, the Discovery may also be replaced as well I.e defender and Disco both go.
Freelander, rangie sport and full fat to get 7 seats, Dc will be poverty spec on coils as a base/farmer/ builder spec up to a more sophisticated version for the leisure market, leather, air, auto etc.

Defender will be made for the scumbag 3rd world/people that can't move with the times market and made in Inda to a price alongside its sister vehice, the Tata flap.

??? how racist is that, calling 3rd world people scumbags.

Opposition to the Dc100 is nothing to do with not moving with the times, I said myself time after time that the Defender needs an update, but the DC100 is

, please just realise that everyone else thinks that, thousands of people can't be wrong, even Landrover are going away and having a re-think, and not before time!

5th Apr 2012 9:16pm

Page 2 of 5

All times are GMT

Jump to

< Previous Topic | Next Topic >

Posting Rules

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum