![]() | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Puma 90 HT - Commercial BIK? |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
kenzle8a Member Since: 12 Feb 2020 Location: None Posts: 1074 ![]() ![]() |
Should be N1 on the V5 and 4x4 light commercial and (I am not an accountant) but I think they are classed as a van for BIK, the Double Cabs are Dual Purpose Vehicles.
|
||
![]() |
|
Leamreject Member Since: 19 Dec 2020 Location: Middle Earth - Leamington Spa Posts: 970 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In simple terms, the previous model Defenders were classed as LCV’s, current models are classed as cars Ride like you stole it!!
If I’m not on a bike it’s because only a 4x4 will do… 2011 2.4 Puma 90 HT |
||
![]() |
|
Mr Fox Member Since: 10 Sep 2011 Location: green & pleasant land Posts: 1038 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you - that is helpful. I will ask my accountant. I was certain I'd read threads where people on here were using the Puma 90 HT as commercial vehicles for tax purposes but cannot find the threads. |
||
![]() |
|
90 Dreamer Member Since: 13 Jul 2019 Location: Oop North Posts: 2191 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When I purchased my 90 H/T i was told by the accountant that it was the only 90 variant that I could class as commercial, think the 110 DCabs also qualify but not station wagons
|
||
![]() |
|
Welshsurferdude Member Since: 23 Feb 2012 Location: Newport Posts: 2444 ![]() ![]() |
anything registered as commercial is good
![]() all hinges what your v5 reads whatever defender you own 2008 Santorini Black 110 XS USW (Sold) 2015 Discovery 4.5 Black pack Firenze red XS 2008 Corris Grey 110 XS USW (sold) 2011 Santorini Black 110 XS USW (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Mr Fox Member Since: 10 Sep 2011 Location: green & pleasant land Posts: 1038 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wouldn't HMRCs database of suitable cars trump a V5C?
|
||
![]() |
|
camelman Member Since: 27 Feb 2013 Location: Peak District Posts: 3387 ![]() ![]() |
From the HMRC guidance published in 2014
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/e...l/eim23155 "Land Rover Defender Station Wagons HMRC has always considered these vehicles to be cars for tax purposes for the reasons given above, i.e. that they are mechanically propelled road vehicles, and none of the exceptions in s115(1) (EIM23100) apply to prevent them being cars. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fc76/2fc76eb87c57c530863e00647a143cb9521bcd96" alt=""