↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > OMG MAF cleaned and WOW
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
MartinK



Member Since: 02 Mar 2011
Location: Silverdale (Lancashire/Cumbria Border)
Posts: 2665

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Orkney Grey
Just a BIG THANK YOU for those adding value to this thread, especially the OP.

My Defender is 10 years old, and 52k miles (owned by me from new, with no maintenance given previously to the VCV or MAF).

Had a few sporadic issues with my Defender 2.4 TDCI recently. including intermittent power loss, not being able to rev out, and even stalling on idle.

I changed the VCV a couple of weeks ago, it did make some improvement but still having some issues. Cleaned the MAF today with Comma Contact Cleaner (from Halfrauds) and Yay! Back to full performance.

Thanks guys...wealth of knowledge on here Thumbs Up Defender "Puma" 2.4 110 County Utility (possibly the last of the 2.4's)
Post #921175 12th Sep 2021 3:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Gasket



Member Since: 30 May 2020
Location: Manchester
Posts: 629

This is a really interesting thread - I'd literally just been going through the LR Maintenance Check Sheet for my 2.4 90 and was surprised that there's very little recommended in terms of cleaning parts of the engine bay beyond fluids and filters. I'd been about to ask about other areas to clean when I saw this post.

The obvious question is are there any other areas of the engine worth periodically removing and cleaning? (scope would be driveway service rather than a full engine strip-down like Nige).

I'm about to fit a replacement cat from a low mileage vehicle due to my old downpipe being a little rusty, I'll obviously do all the oils, fluids and filters plus, now, the MAF and MAP sensors - are there any other pinch points? (EGR is always something that strikes me as a gunk-trap).
Post #921282 13th Sep 2021 2:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5808

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
hank wrote:
I asked the same question in the last post of the below thread but got no response

https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic68596-45.html

I would also like to do this when time permits having seen seen some horror photos around the internet!


Click image to enlarge


What/where the h*ll is that Hank? Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #921296 13th Sep 2021 4:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ianh



Member Since: 17 Sep 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 2000

United Kingdom 
LandRoverAnorak wrote:

There's also this one in the pipe to the top of the intercooler but I don't know what it's called:


Click image to enlarge


LRA, I think that 3rd green coloured sensor you show is an “Air Charge Sensor” part number LR032216

That’s what LR call it but in reality I think it’s an Air Charge Temperature Sensor.

Listed as part 8 on this diagram https://www.lrworkshop.com/diagrams/land-r...es_2.2tdci

Noting I can’t see the equivalent sensor on the 2.4.

My understanding of the roles these sensors perform.
So function wise the MAF is measuring the volume of air from the filter box on its way to the turbo, the turbo is compressing the air but in doing so also heats it, so the compressed air is sent to the intercooler to be cooled and increase its density, the Air Charge Sensor is measuring the temperature of the air exiting the intercooler and heading to the inlet manifold and the MAP sensor is measuring the pressure of the air in the inlet manifold. These three sensors are providing inputs that are used with other inputs to determine and provide the optimum fuel air mixture at any specific time.

So having them all nice and clean and sending correct data to the ECU is key . Noting that 3rd (green coloured) Air Charge Sensor that LRA highlighted seems to get missed out in other threads but I expect it plays a key role as well.
Post #921302 13th Sep 2021 5:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 484

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
X4SKP wrote:
I would only use a recommended cleaner on them as these units are expensive at around £140 + Vat
(£168.00 Inc) from Land Rover, there are factored claimed equivalents on the market at around £70.00 Inc


Some days ago, I just read that recommended cleaners were 99% white gas or paraffine Confused

They list the substances on their product sheets...
Post #921306 13th Sep 2021 5:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Rich01483



Member Since: 26 Jul 2021
Location: Uk
Posts: 15

Thanks everyone for this, lots more to add to the to do list!
Post #922504 23rd Sep 2021 6:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
glpinxit



Member Since: 31 Jul 2010
Location: rural Somerset
Posts: 156

United Kingdom 
Found this thread a couple of weeks ago and have now had the chance to use brake cleaner to clean all 3 sensors highlighted in @LandRoverAnorak 's post. 32K mile 2.2 engine and only the MAP sensor appeared at all grubby and that only looked vaguely sooty. So no particular expectation of noticeable improvement but it has mostly eliminated a bit of a tendency to lurch when driven slowly and stutter on part throttle at a steady 60mph.
The aerosol brake cleaner smells like tetrachloromethane (or carbon tetrachloride if you are older). Used to be recommended in the 1960s for removing beach tar from clothing. Cheers, Guy.
Post #922767 25th Sep 2021 3:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ianh



Member Since: 17 Sep 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 2000

United Kingdom 
Brake cleaner should not be used on the sensors, you need to use specialist MAF sensor cleaner such as Liqui moly air flow sensor cleaner, else you can likely do more damage than good. It not expensive and you only need a little on each sensor.
Post #922779 25th Sep 2021 6:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums