Home > Technical > Fuel Cut off solenoid |
|
|
smb Member Since: 15 Jan 2013 Location: Cheshire Posts: 1232 |
The Engine running dry must shortly be a better scenario than having the car stolen and you never seeing it again?
|
||
28th Feb 2017 1:54pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5054 |
The special fuel primer tool isnt actually required to restart them - but it helps...i did begin to wondered a few years ago, but it eventually took.
I thought it auto sensed no fuel or poor pressure and shut down to protect itself. Mike |
||
28th Feb 2017 2:27pm |
|
zsd-puma Member Since: 09 Aug 2016 Location: Kent Posts: 2720 |
I think the 2.2 will probably restart without the priming tool as it has an electric in tank pump. Whereas the 2.4 doesn't.
|
||
28th Feb 2017 2:36pm |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5054 |
it was the 2.4 i got going, not needed to do it on the 2.2
the worse one ever was the 1.8tdci in a ford - no matter how much i primed it, i couldnt get it to go - 2hours later and it did...i think the battery gets a bit weak after a while Mike |
||
28th Feb 2017 3:16pm |
|
Low-Range Member Since: 30 Sep 2016 Location: BC Posts: 41 |
Saw an excellent anti theft device...locks clutch and break together.
|
||
28th Feb 2017 4:21pm |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17541 |
A common misconception! There is no lift pump in the tank on a 2.4. so the LP pump on the engine won't self-prime. LR mandates the use of a manual (rubber bladder type) bleed pump, but there are plenty of ways round the problem. The simplest is to extend the tank breather somewhere clean (a good idea in its own right) and blow down it. The 2.2 I believe has a lift pump in the tank and I imagine is therefore easier. To be honest, though, as an anti-theft device I think it is a good idea. If the villains steal my Puma, and it apparently runs out of fuel down the road, I am entirely happy if they can't bleed the system and get it running quickly since it allows more time for detection and recovery. I think "officialdom" might frown upon it since you cannot predict where it will stop, so it could be on a level crossing or somewhere equally catastrophic. If I was going down this route, I'd also swtich the tank sensor so that the gauge showed empty. Come to think of it, on a Puma if you switch the tank sensor so that the gauge shows empty, the ECU will put the vehicle into low fuel strategy mode since it will think there's no fuel, and will stop the engine and inhibit start in short time anyway thus achieving the same result as a solenoid or valve. Unless the villains are savvy enough to dip the tank they'll have no way of knowing if it has genuinely run out or not. You won't have to rebleed either since it won't actually have run out of fuel. |
||
28th Feb 2017 4:27pm |
|
zsd-puma Member Since: 09 Aug 2016 Location: Kent Posts: 2720 |
And while it's cranking there's a good chance the pump is running without any lubrication. |
||
1st Mar 2017 12:09am |
|
Jim G Member Since: 21 Jul 2014 Location: Ormskirk Posts: 92 |
I have a 300TDI.
On this engine I just broke into the wire that feeds power to the fuel shut off valve on the pump, this is how the engine is stopped when the ignition is switched off, and fitted a hidden switch. this causes no harm as you are just stopping it as per normal ( or not allowing the engine to start) , I have had this on mine for 3 years and had no problems ( except occasionally forgetting the switch and trying to start ) I have even shut the engine off AT IDLE with this switch, no problem. 1984 300TDi hardtop Stornoway Grey 1984 200TDi hardtop..... soon to be a V8 .. but which V8 ? 1974 DAF T244 4x4 wagon converted to a motorhome 1976 Jaguar XJC with supercharged engine |
||
5th Mar 2017 9:35am |
|
xcentric Member Since: 17 Jan 2016 Location: Midlands Posts: 247 |
layers layers layers.....
fitting a hidden switch into an existing circuit is a good idea, but useless if they have bypassed all switches by connecting the battery directly to it - which is where a separate fuel cutoff will then prove its worth. As for basic electronics on a switch, it's the same whether you use a headphone-type jack or similar - usually open, but something makes it closed..... explore online, you'll find a number of different 'switches' ranging from a toggle switch to an rfid one to one you have to insert something into..... good luck. Reminds me I must fit my fuel solenoid switch too..... |
||
5th Mar 2017 3:40pm |
|
nitram17 Member Since: 08 Jun 2014 Location: newcastle Posts: 2261 |
judt looking at some old security stuff .... i forgot about my fuel cut of switch on my 2,2 puma ran for about a mile then stalled......i had to purge the air out before the 2,2 would start. |
||
30th May 2021 10:49am |
|
nitram17 Member Since: 08 Jun 2014 Location: newcastle Posts: 2261 |
hi blackwolf by switching the tank gauge sensor do you mean putting a cutoff switch in the cable or reversing the wires so full is empty and empty is full? on a 2.2 where is the sensor? sorry if this is a blonde question! |
||
30th May 2021 10:58am |
|
nitram17 Member Since: 08 Jun 2014 Location: newcastle Posts: 2261 |
hi blackwolf by switching the tank gauge sensor do you mean putting a cutoff switch in the cable or reversing the wires so full is empty and empty is full? on a 2.2 where is the sensor? sorry if this is a blonde question! |
||
30th May 2021 10:58am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis