↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > 2.0l vs 3.0l engine
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
deaston



Member Since: 18 Dec 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 150

United Kingdom 
2.0l vs 3.0l engine
I used to have a Velar which had a 2.0l, 240hp diesel engine.

The Defender I've ordered has a 3.0l, 250hp diesel engine.

Why the extra litre of displacement? What difference does that make if the power output is essentially the same?
Post #876196 4th Jan 2021 1:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
vlad



Member Since: 11 Oct 2020
Location: RO
Posts: 67

Romania 
I believe the D250 (249HP) and D300 (300HP) use the same inline six-cylinder Ingenium diesel engine, perhaps they're tuned differently? MY2021 Defender 90 P400 SE
Post #876204 4th Jan 2021 2:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Simon Audi



Member Since: 19 Nov 2020
Location: Newport
Posts: 544

United Kingdom 
The 3.0L is available in 3 versions on Defender - 200BHP - 250 BHP and 300 BHP - there is also a 350BHP 3.0i6 on the RR I believe?


You get more torque compared to the 4 cylinder for the same BHP from the 6 V 4 cylinder
Post #876206 4th Jan 2021 3:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
deaston



Member Since: 18 Dec 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 150

United Kingdom 
I still can't really work out the difference between a 3.0L and a 2.0L if they both have the same power output.

I'm guessing torque...
Post #876209 4th Jan 2021 3:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
J77



Member Since: 04 Nov 2019
Location: Fife
Posts: 3425

Scotland 
D250 - 570nm for the 3.0 and 500nm for the 2.0 (D240)

D200 - 500nm for the 3.0 and 430 for the 2.0. 24MY 90 D250 HSE, Tasman Blue


Last edited by J77 on 4th Jan 2021 4:31pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #876215 4th Jan 2021 3:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Retroanaconda



Member Since: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2688

Scotland 
One is a four-cylinder and one a six-cylinder - the latter has a bunch more torque as above. Plus in theory less stress on components for a given power output.

Not to mention the silky-smooth nature of six-pot compared to a four?
Post #876216 4th Jan 2021 3:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
milesr3



Member Since: 12 Feb 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 873

2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Keswick Green
https://media.landrover.com/en-gb/news/202...-and-new-x

"New Ingenium in-line six-cylinder diesel engine and Intelligent All-Wheel Drive
A new in-line six-cylinder diesel option from the Ingenium engine family is now available, offering enhanced torque delivery, smooth responses and improved fuel economy thanks to its Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) technology and a new Intelligent All Wheel Drive system.

Sitting at the top of the range, the D300 delivers enhanced power and torque, with 300PS and 650Nm of torque, providing a 0-60mph time of 6.3 seconds (0-100km/h in 6.7 seconds) for the Defender 90. The higher torque figure means the Defender D300 provides effortless performance both on and off-road, perfectly fitting Defender’s tough character.

The MHEV technology contributes to enhanced fuel economy through an efficient Stop/Start system which cuts the engine at a standstill, as well as recuperating energy normally lost under braking or decelerating. This energy is then sent back into the battery pack and can be redeployed later. A key benefit of MHEV is that this energy is used when accelerating, delivering faster responses for greater performance.

The new intelligent driveline system continually varies axle torque based on sensor data from the vehicle’s surroundings and driver inputs to distribute all torque to one axle or the other as required. This intelligent torque distribution system optimises the driveline for traction, on-road dynamics and driveline efficiency, resulting in improved fuel economy and reduced CO2 emissions – all without sacrificing any of Defender's inherent off-road capability.

In combination with MHEV technology and the superior refinement of the in-line six-cylinder engine, the diesel Defenders are more economical, more responsive and more refined than the engines they supercede.

The D200 and D240 become D200 and D250 models for 2021, using the same in-line six-cylinder Ingenium engine as the D300 with 200PS and 249PS respectively. An uplift in torque delivers enhanced usability, with 500Nm (D200) and 570Nm (D250) available, utilising MHEV technology to boost fuel efficiency and reduce emissions across the diesel Defender line-up".
Post #876221 4th Jan 2021 4:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
deaston



Member Since: 18 Dec 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 150

United Kingdom 
I can't see anywhere in that press release an explanation about the differences between a 2L and 3L engine each with the same horsepower.

Unless I'm missing something.
Post #876236 4th Jan 2021 5:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
deaston



Member Since: 18 Dec 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 150

United Kingdom 
Retroanaconda wrote:
One is a four-cylinder and one a six-cylinder - the latter has a bunch more torque as above. Plus in theory less stress on components for a given power output.

Not to mention the silky-smooth nature of six-pot compared to a four?


But that's cylinders (which I know make up the total displacement).
Post #876238 4th Jan 2021 5:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Simon Audi



Member Since: 19 Nov 2020
Location: Newport
Posts: 544

United Kingdom 
For the same POWER (BHP) you get more TORQUE (NM)
Post #876245 4th Jan 2021 5:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
milesr3



Member Since: 12 Feb 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 873

2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Keswick Green
70Nm more peak torque with a broader and greater level of torque off-boost, so it will have better part-throttle response. Simply, larger capacity engines are less reliant on boost from the turbo to make torque so they are more linear.

A straight-six engine also has practically perfect balance for lower levels of vibration. There's lot more to it than an extra 10bhp.

milesr3 wrote:
"A new in-line six-cylinder diesel option from the Ingenium engine family is now available, offering enhanced torque delivery, smooth responses and [snip] an uplift in torque delivers enhanced usability".
Post #876252 4th Jan 2021 5:49pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Oldyellar



Member Since: 04 Sep 2015
Location: Central
Posts: 403

Scotland 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Corris Grey
Are the 3.0 diesels available now ? And are the 2.0 diesels now redundant?
Post #877412 10th Jan 2021 9:50am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Retroanaconda



Member Since: 04 Jan 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2688

Scotland 
Yes, available to order now and dealers will have some 3.0 stock.

The 2.0 diesels aren’t redundant, just superseded. There will be some new ones around so could be worth a deal if you are okay with the smaller engine. But personally having driven both I’d go with the 6-cylinder.
Post #877415 10th Jan 2021 9:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mse



Member Since: 06 Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5059

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Scotia Grey
deaston wrote:
I can't see anywhere in that press release an explanation about the differences between a 2L and 3L engine each with the same horsepower.

Unless I'm missing something.


I have a d240 and a range of other new JLR engines v and straight.

Noting the past sizes of defender engines and the uses of 2l in the range, power output - I don’t think it’s a big deal.

They will always up-play the new engine - don’t blame them, but I don’t think it’s a huge benefit for such a small improvement etc Mike
Post #877478 10th Jan 2021 2:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Simon Audi wrote:
For the same POWER (BHP) you get more TORQUE (NM)


Or less revs.
Post #877509 10th Jan 2021 3:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums