↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > INEOS Grenadier > What do you expect from the Grenadier?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
Print this entire topic · 
benniferj



Member Since: 20 Oct 2016
Location: Basingstoke
Posts: 361

United Kingdom 2003 Defender 110 Td5 XS CSW Oslo Blue
Im trying to give the Grenadier a balanced look in regards to it is very much a step into the unknown and just because it resembles a Land Rover doesn't mean it is in any sort of historical, familiar build kind of way.
I guess what I expect, or hope to see from them is a 'nuts and bolts' vehicle that complies with vehicle legislation and frankly something that I wanted or expected from a Defender revamp. I'd like it to be very reconfigurable, as simple as can be bearing in mind regs really!

What I dont expect is the Grenadier to fall into a price point that works for me, unfortunately, but lets see where they go with that. LR have created something at an outrageously high price point, that doesn't tick any boxes for me at all, so at least Ineos have shown us something that COULD be very good and hopefully proves it is. Insta: @thebenjordan4x4
Post #841331 2nd Jul 2020 4:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
Supacat wrote:
Looks really appealing to me:

Click image to enlarge

Although quite blurry, there's a pic of the interior on the LHS in the background... Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia
Post #841392 2nd Jul 2020 8:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Well spotted. Thumbs Up

Post #841418 3rd Jul 2020 4:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MikeJ



Member Since: 04 May 2014
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Posts: 41

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 HCPU Fuji White
Supacat wrote:
Looks really appealing to me:

Click image to enlarge


That looks a lot bigger than the SW. Looks like a longer wheelbase and a longer overhang behind the rear wheels.
That will be a big truck - I reckon it's bigger than the Amarok we have and that's a lot longer than the 110.
Finally a double cab with decent rear seats? I always find them too upright for long trips.

How about a vat qualifying USW (we're calling them "hard tops" now, aren't we Laughing )?
That would be interesting...

Mike
Post #841464 3rd Jul 2020 9:22am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
SN



Member Since: 29 Jun 2007
Location: SK6
Posts: 729

Supacat wrote:
Well spotted. Thumbs Up



Here's a better grab


Click image to enlarge
 Steve N | 21MY Defender | 08MY Discovery 3 (history) | 06MY Discovery 3 (ancient history)
Post #841467 3rd Jul 2020 10:01am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17382

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
MikeJ wrote:
Supacat wrote:
Looks really appealing to me:

Click image to enlarge


That looks a lot bigger than the SW. Looks like a longer wheelbase and a longer overhang behind the rear wheels.
That will be a big truck - I reckon it's bigger than the Amarok we have and that's a lot longer than the 110.
Finally a double cab with decent rear seats? I always find them too upright for long trips.

How about a vat qualifying USW (we're calling them "hard tops" now, aren't we Laughing )?
That would be interesting...

Mike


I reckon the wheelbase is about 24" longer than the SW version, if you compare rear wheel positions and sizes, and certainly at first glance it looks as though ti has a great deal going for it. It will however be interesting to see inside since the very thin rear panel directly behind the rear door suggests that the rear seat either must be pretty upright or further forward than you might expect (less legroom). It is I guess a preproduction so may change, but the mere fact it is being shown and is in the line-up is something I find hugely encouraging.
Post #841491 3rd Jul 2020 12:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Swine&Small



Member Since: 20 Mar 2017
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1223

United Kingdom 
"What do you expect from the Grenadier?"
A decent trade in price for my Defender ? 1983 Series 3 Pick up in Marine Blue
1967 Morris Traveller
1966 Morris Convertible
2012 VW T5 Camper
Quod Abundat Non Obstat.
Post #841493 3rd Jul 2020 12:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
So whilst the issue of the oblong box on the station wagon is potentially solved (although it does seem to still be odd), here's another one on the double cab.

What are these?


Click image to enlarge
Post #841495 3rd Jul 2020 12:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RFT



Member Since: 13 Nov 2010
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 678

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 130 Puma 2.4 HCPU Zermatt Silver
Looking really good
The double cab pick up max axle load would be good to know as well as carrying capacity. 130 Puma HCPU with an Artica 240LR Demountable Camper
Post #841500 3rd Jul 2020 12:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
doncarloz



Member Since: 29 Oct 2017
Location: Styria
Posts: 60

Austria 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Supacat wrote:
So whilst the issue of the oblong box on the station wagon is potentially solved (although it does seem to still be odd), here's another one on the double cab.

What are these?


Click image to enlarge


Maybe the attachement points for automatically folding sidesteps? ___________________________________
1993 D1 200 Tdi
2015 110 DCPU 2.2 Tdci
2017 RRS 3.0 TDV6
Post #841504 3rd Jul 2020 12:34pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
NMBRPL8



Member Since: 07 Jul 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 146

Australia 
Cup holders?
Post #841517 3rd Jul 2020 1:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Morepower



Member Since: 08 Jan 2013
Location: Fife, Scotland
Posts: 630

New Zealand 
MikeJ wrote:
Supacat wrote:
Looks really appealing to me:

Click image to enlarge


That looks a lot bigger than the SW. Looks like a longer wheelbase and a longer overhang behind the rear wheels.
That will be a big truck - I reckon it's bigger than the Amarok we have and that's a lot longer than the 110.
Finally a double cab with decent rear seats? I always find them too upright for long trips.

How about a vat qualifying USW (we're calling them "hard tops" now, aren't we Laughing )?
That would be interesting...

Mike


Excuse me Mike... But the hardtop is still not a commercial vehicle... Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing If the hype is to be believed then this will carry 1 tonne (so should be vat qualifying)... It doesn't matter how bad it is, It can always get worse...

2013 Bowler 110 (Sold)
2016 Bowler 90 Rally Spec (Sold)
Post #841589 3rd Jul 2020 5:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums