↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > Norton Motorcycles
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 5 12345>
Print this entire topic · 
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
Norton Motorcycles
Would be very interested if anyone on here is affected by Norton Motorcycles apparently going into administration today and in particular if you have paid a deposit / in full for a bike that has never been delivered??

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/jan...nistration

Have previously seen a few guys with Defenders on factory tours, etc
Post #812567 29th Jan 2020 8:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DonH2000



Member Since: 12 Jan 2015
Location: North Kent
Posts: 551

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
Sad but every Company knows the rules, if you don't pay your taxes the Revenue are the first and most vicious to come after you.

Also they are guilty of Trading Whilst Insolvent which is also against the law. Cheers Don.
Post #812649 30th Jan 2020 9:21am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
bit more than 'sad' for those people who were sold a dream, paid in full and then given many false promises (potentially lied to) and still don't have their product...........seems a lot of the Industry was aware of certain issues but they have still been allowed to carry on taking peoples money!!
Post #812673 30th Jan 2020 11:19am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Bloke behind the new Norton has quite an interesting history:

https://thespeakersagency.com/speaker/stuart-garner/

Is your deposit direct with them rather than a dealer? Reading online about a bloke who paid in full, £18k, and has been waiting 7 months. Shocked
Post #812736 30th Jan 2020 5:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
To my knowledge all of the Special Edition bikes were sold direct from the factory rather than dealer.........

Looking more and more like a Ponzi scheme!!

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/...nd-scandal
Post #812768 30th Jan 2020 7:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Good background article on Norton and it's money tree here:

https://www.morebikes.co.uk/news/67560/sev...-collapse/
Post #813019 1st Feb 2020 8:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
as above simple Ponzi scheme...........massive amount of articles all over by various people which all appear to state is was "known" or "inevitable", where were all of these people when honest punters were laying down payments and ultimately getting scammed??

the main issue appears to be Garners use / misuse (allegedly) of the Pension pot funds and the rather 'interesting' characters that acquired them
Post #813027 1st Feb 2020 9:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Not sure it can be likened to a Ponzi scheme, it looks like the guy at the top has lost everything he put into the business as well.

Amazing the Government and top bank have also been in the dark about this.

Will any deposits paid by credit card potentially be liable to refund by them?
Post #813060 1st Feb 2020 1:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
i think its incredibly naive to believe that Garner is some sort of victim in all of this, have you read any of those articles particularly the ones that deal with the pension fund (mis) management and his removal / barring from involvement let alone the way the payments for bikes have been handled..........
in approx the last month he has seemingly taken delivery of a brand new Aston Martin to add to his reasonable collection, that does not appear to be the actions of worried businessman

in most cases it would appear you are not talking about deposits as such but full payments for some of the special edition bikes that amount to circa £40K+/each (200 limited edition V4SS alone and few have been built / delivered) and had to be paid for in full to guarantee order!!!
and he had already announced yet another limited edition bike and started taking payments........

their treatment of customers and business practise over the last 8-12months that i have knowledge and exeperience of again does not add up to a 'well run' business
Post #813062 1st Feb 2020 1:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Happy for you to provide links to some of the statements you are making. Taking delivery of a car without knowing who owns it is hardly hard evidence of a crime...

Talking of naive, it's hardly that giving someone the benefit of the doubt until all the facts are known. On the other hand, giving someone £40k without doing some form of due diligence or attempting to secure it by a financial mechanism...
Post #813092 1st Feb 2020 3:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
You seem massively defensive of someone that has already been found wanting by the Pension Ombudsman and is painted in very dark shades of grey in pretty much every emerging report that reveals ever more strange dealings, will be very intriguing to see what the administrators viewpoint is
(your first name isn't Stuart by any chance is it Whistle )

Your own link shows just some of the now known issues but why not try and read some of the other links i have posted or indeed simply google Norton issues for yourself and see how much information is emerging

There is enough 'smoke'for both ITV and The Guardian to have launched a joint investigation and make News at Ten on consecutive nights.......

No skin off my nose but feel free to continue insulting the decent customers of Norton that have done no different to many others who wished to secure a 'halo' model from a seemingly well established manufacturer - not prepared to discuss openly but i do have some very direct exeperiences of just some of the goings on
Post #813109 1st Feb 2020 5:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
90 Dreamer wrote:
the main issue appears to be Garners use / misuse (allegedly) of the Pension pot funds and the rather 'interesting' characters that acquired them


I think the pension money is not really a major factor in Norton's fall if it amounts to only £2m of the total moneygoround.

The details of where the pension pots where to be invested were made in black and white in the schemes Statement of Investment Principles:

“In setting the investment strategy, the Trustees invest primarily in preference shares in the capital of Norton Motorcycles (UK) Limited (the Company).”

Garner never solicited the money from the external investors.

Investing in such a single illiquid manner could be deemed naive. Indeed, the Ombudsman talks of a test of "care as an ordinary prudent person would take" for the Trustee, but no such test for the investor. In one of the other determinations is "Mr N was unable to provide copies of any documents relating to when he joined the Scheme". Mr N transferred in over £40k of his pension but had no records!

After reading several determinations, I think the chief culprit is a system, or lack of one that allows financially vulnerable people to make such life changing mistakes. The deregulation of pensions has led to a wild west/gold rush environment.

It's all very sad. I'm sure Garner made mistakes, the businesses have lost money, he may have done things he can be held to account for, and if so, I hope he is; but Prof Speth lost £3.4 billion in a quarter at JLR and he's not being labelled as a criminal.
Post #813203 2nd Feb 2020 10:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
90 Dreamer wrote:
You seem massively defensive of someone that has already been found wanting by the Pension Ombudsman

Not massively, but have you seen the sort of people the Ombudsman has "found wanting":

Lloyds Bank Pension Scheme No 2
Armed Forces Pension Scheme
Royal Mail Pension Plan
Action for Children Pension Fund
Police Injury Benefit Scheme
Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Pension Scheme

Not those I'd be lining up against the wall first, come the Revolution...

90 Dreamer wrote:
No skin off my nose but feel free to continue insulting the decent customers of Norton

Is that what using the word "naive" does?

90 Dreamer wrote:
why not try and read some of the other links i have posted

Genuinely - where? I can only see one link in a post of yours above?
Post #813206 2nd Feb 2020 10:52am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
90 Dreamer



Member Since: 13 Jul 2019
Location: Oop North
Posts: 2165

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
Post #813230 2nd Feb 2020 3:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Looked again and last filed accounts show £6.5m.

Update: The new Trustee, Dalriada, stated in November 2019 "Norton have made some redemptions to date, reducing the Schemes' liabilities by about £2m. However, there remains an amount due to be recovered by the Schemes in excess of £14m."

Incidentally, Norton were regularly redeeming the preference shares held by the pension schemes, which supports the claims made by Garner to the Pension Ombudsman ~ in the last accounts to the tune of £611k ~ that given it was used as working capital, it was not an easy thing to convert to cash. Definitely not anything like the Ponzi scheme you describe.


Last edited by Supacat on 4th Feb 2020 12:33pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #813282 2nd Feb 2020 7:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 5 12345>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums