↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > 2020 Defender main discussion thread
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  Down to end
Page 134 of 351 <123 ... 133134135 ... 349350351>
Print this entire topic · 
mikelike



Member Since: 31 Aug 2011
Location: new zealand
Posts: 108

Unfortunately JLR have headed once again down a dangerous divisive road with the new Defender .

The Disco 5 , should of taught them a few lessons when it comes to market appeal and affordability .
Truth is , the Disco 5 has alienated itself away from previous Discovery buyers and seems to be a low volume seller
in a sea of better value SUV ' s .

In our market , consumers opt for a Range Rover sport , when entering a Land Rover dealer .

I fear for the new Defender , it is not pretty and will suffer from affordability problems .
Reliability I believe will be on par with the Disco 5 as it is the same car with a rather dull re body , and this is a major
Concern .

As for all this nonsense about the last Defender only sold 25000 units world wide , well yes it did , but to be honest that was remarkable sales considering the vehicle had been starved of any development in years and the average modern human being could hardly fit in the bloody thing !

If you travel the globe you notice the pick up phenomena , this is a product that gives manufacturers volume credibility .
Modern Land Rovers have lived of the credibility of series/ defenders and now this has been all lost .
The new Defender lacks adaptability and this means bushability and ultimately credibility .
Yes it will sell in small numbers to the hollywood set and wealthy urbanites but it will never be seen in great numbers in the deserts of the world , this has been lost to Toyota .

The modern Ford Ranger has become a global success story . It is very capable off road , nice to drive , versatile and affordable . Of course this architecture will be seen soon under the Ford Bronco .
This I believe will have adaptability and tunability built in , will be affordable and ultimately have credibility .

No wonder TATA is running around the globe looking for prospective global alliances , all this investment in new platforms and factories yet they lack at Land Rover a global sales success . Range Rover has been successful in recent times but there reliability record is costing sales now .

They have missed a trick with the Defender 90 not being a flexible design with a convertible option ,
Just another mall crawling suv .
Post #805323 8th Dec 2019 12:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Morepower



Member Since: 08 Jan 2013
Location: Fife, Scotland
Posts: 630

New Zealand 
Agreed Mike... A friend put it very well... Every car maker needs a halo product... Porsche has the 911 GT3... They only make a few, But the imagine filters down to every other Porsche...
LR had this with the Defender.... unfortunately they've p****d that up the wall now.... It doesn't matter how bad it is, It can always get worse...

2013 Bowler 110 (Sold)
2016 Bowler 90 Rally Spec (Sold)
Post #805383 8th Dec 2019 8:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
King Luis



Member Since: 23 Oct 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42

Canada 
the defender was LR's halo vehicle? i'd say its the RRS SVR. i think the defender would have been something like the old 911rs. old and great for it's time.
Post #805468 9th Dec 2019 2:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
I’d have to agree with you there King Luis, if I was after a Halo vehicle in 2015 from JLR it certainly wouldn’t have been Harold Houdini’s contortionists box of tricks catering for for the average hight of a human being from 1948.
Going back to the early 90’s I’d have taken a Discovery 1 over the Defender but at that time the P38 was considered by many as the cream of the crop, despite all its problems at least you could get in and out without putting your hip out,
10 years on and the D3 knocked the Defender into a cocked hat and the FFRR as it became known was in many people’s opinion still an aspirational vehicle that set the bar in terms of comfort, luxury and off road ability.

The SVR is at present the one to have and for many the one to have,

If we are taking the 911 as an example, although the basic shape “teardrop” remains, the current 992 is a big car compared to the previous incarnations only as recent as 1995 the 993 Was a small car in comparison. And their Halo car would be the GT2 RS, which is the bar as to which all others are measured, and none come any where near. DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #805548 9th Dec 2019 9:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
King Luis



Member Since: 23 Oct 2019
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42

Canada 
i was trying to keep the 911 theme going on but ya, you saw my point. Thumbs Up
Post #805633 10th Dec 2019 1:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
Thumbs Up

The most recent bog standard 992 nips off 60 in a nats under 3.0 secs, the fast ones have yet to be released, a far far cry from the first 911 which by today’s standards are archaic, there is a certain element of nostalgia bestowed upon these early vehicles, most of which average about £100k, some as you mention will fetch half a million quid all day every day !

The old ones are very small, the new ones only come in wide body and are very wide and long on the road, the technology in the new 911 has permitted the most basic configuration to challenge super cars, some people hate this “Ferrari” owners, others think it’s great ! The advent of time means that things move on, when BMW adopted MINI after their brief spell at the helm of Land Rover the first thing they did was increase the size of the tiny car, VW had already succeeded with the Beetle and that’s after they moved the engine to the front !

You wouldn’t want to get into an old 911 any more than you would an old mini and travel any length of time or distance because they are great to look at but a raucous contorted spine jarring cacophony of the heat, noise, smell and vibration that is emitted to every part of your body fantastic for an hour and then the novelty wears off, Twice a month for a blatt into the peaks or nipping round the Evo triangle on a Sunday morning at 7 am is manageable. Just.....

I’m enjoying RRS comfort, it’s build quality and the ability to eat up 4K miles a month. The thought of sitting in a defender at this time of year For hours on end with the cold striking thro the door shut onto the side of my body was once a novelty, Now it’s just a grimace as I think about the times I’ve hit my back on that bloody door striker !

Big Cry DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #805642 10th Dec 2019 2:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Morepower



Member Since: 08 Jan 2013
Location: Fife, Scotland
Posts: 630

New Zealand 
You've both missed the point... My bad.... The GT3 goes racing... It filters down the racing imagine to every Porsche... The same could have been said about a Defender (myth or not)... Joe public in the street saw it a a vehicle that could go anywhere... Ok.. not actually true... However its about perception.....
Case in point... When I did the free half day training I took the Bowler 90... Some other guy doing the course of the same day pitched up in his brand new Rangie.... NO ONE was interested in a the Rangie... I spent well over an hour answering questions about the 90... It's about perception..... It doesn't matter how bad it is, It can always get worse...

2013 Bowler 110 (Sold)
2016 Bowler 90 Rally Spec (Sold)
Post #805673 10th Dec 2019 7:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
I get exactly what you mean...... Like when I ride my Yeti Cyclo-X bike on the road and stop off at a cafe......

Some of the lads ride bikes worth 10 - 12K, they can’t believe how an aluminium bike draws so much attention when Chris Froome’s old pinnerello is next to it !

I get what your saying but if I ask 25 of my close friends or relatives if they think a defender holds any kind of light over or above a RRS SVR they would absolutely laugh in my face, baring in mind half of them have been shot at in them or blown up and the other half “farmers” stopped buying them 15 years ago when the fixed bulk head prevented any one over 5’4” from driving it,

The other point I was trying to make, the new defender needs to be comfortable, refined, have driver aids, it needs to Be bigger inside and it needs to have some kind of safety features ? You couldn’t fit side impact protection in the old one ! Or air bags, or comfy seats or a glove box, to fit these in the thing has to grow up ! It needs to leave its archaic roots behind just as Toyotas HiLux did, I get that the defender is imotive but what I don’t get is why people can’t see that it has to change,

P.S. The Metzger engine, lightened chassis and rose jointed suspension tricked down from the RS to the GT3, DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #805695 10th Dec 2019 8:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
22900013A



Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3149

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Keswick Green
I actually think most folk acknowledge the new model had to change, they/we just feel it did not have to change quite so much nor grow in the direction it did.

I think the idea of change being opposed at every turn is not much more than a myth, all the complaints about electronics, td5, tdi etc I have no memory of from the times they came out.

When I read things like "everyone opposed the TD5 when it came out because of electronics/complexity" I think - where was this, because I never saw it?!

The new one I'm afraid has caused such opposition because it doesnt really have any obvious connection to the old either in vehicle type or intended buyer, and especially in the styling. The fact the "influencers" have to keep reminding us of its strong DNA link etc etc only serves to confirm it doesnt have any. 2011 110 USW
1973 Series III 1-Ton
1972 Series III 1-Ton Cherrypicker
1969 IIA 1-Ton
1966 IIA 88"
Post #805754 11th Dec 2019 8:22am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
lohr500



Member Since: 14 Sep 2014
Location: Skipton
Posts: 1316

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
The new one I'm afraid has caused such opposition because it doesnt really have any obvious connection to the old either in vehicle type or intended buyer, and especially in the styling. The fact the "influencers" have to keep reminding us of its strong DNA link etc etc only serves to confirm it doesnt have any

I couldn't agree more. Thumbs Up
Post #805756 11th Dec 2019 8:37am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
LandRoverAnorak



Member Since: 17 Jul 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 11324

United Kingdom 
22900013A wrote:
When I read things like "everyone opposed the TD5 when it came out because of electronics/complexity" I think - where was this, because I never saw it?!

I agree with everything you've said about the new one but this was definitely a 'thing' at the time. I distinctly remember it being discussed on forums and LR email lists, as well as in magazines (remember them?). The concern was about faults developing that you couldn't see (how would you fix an ecu problem in the desert, etc?) but the concerns lessened as time proved its' reliability and affordable tools such as the original Nanocom became available. By the time we got to the Disco 3, the levels of complexity were an order of magnitude higher and the same concerns were raised again. Those concerns proved to be more well founded though, and despite being a fantastic car to drive, it did suffer from some problems, some of which weren't resolved until the D4. Now, of course, the biggest worry with those cars is the cost of maintaining them as they get older when very expensive components start to fail. By and large, even the earliest LR's can still be easily maintained with a bit of ingenuity. For even the TD5 era though, some parts are now NLA or becoming prohibitively expensive (BBUS and ABS valve block, for instance). Darren

110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia
Post #805769 11th Dec 2019 9:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
I bought a 300tdi Cobar Blue 90 CSW in 1999, late registered, Because of the concerns surrounding the Td5, they were definately there, LRO and Land Rover Monthly at that time were still big sellers and would often report on issues highlighted above, as well as fuel filter location ? I seem to remember fuel pump issues ? Some of the early cars as usual had issues and I think these were magnified for fear of the unknown. The used Td5 prices bottomed out instantly and the 300tdi had a field day, the old 200tdi’s also fetched strong money.

The hatred bestowed upon the D3 At launch for its up and over tailgate / split level were game Changes and the TDV6 was in league with Lucifer ! Destined for implosion, and how was a Bedouin tribesman going to fix it with all that electickery !
I read an article highlighting that tribesmen had only ever seen Land Rover vehicles and this would not be recognised as a LR product so the tribes wouldn’t know what to do 😳

No one likes change, I get that but they stopped making the Defender 4 years ago, surely it’s a good thing that the name lives on, and if all this talk of failure is correct there are going to be some new cheap cars and some very expensive old ones for sale. DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #805879 12th Dec 2019 2:15am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mikelike



Member Since: 31 Aug 2011
Location: new zealand
Posts: 108

Yes you are correct chalky , the tribes to this day do not recognise a D3 , they have never seen one because people drive Toyotas in the remote places of the world .

The once great globally recognised Land Rovers have disappeared to small leafy suburbs with private schools and a fancy dealership with full and very busy workshops and the latest computer diagnostic equipment .
Post #806044 13th Dec 2019 9:43am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mikelike



Member Since: 31 Aug 2011
Location: new zealand
Posts: 108

Yes you are correct chalky , the tribes to this day do not recognise a D3 , they have never seen one because people drive Toyotas in the remote places of the world .

The once great globally recognised Land Rovers have disappeared to small leafy suburbs with private schools and a fancy dealership with full and very busy workshops and the latest computer diagnostic equipment .
Post #806045 13th Dec 2019 9:44am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
couplands



Member Since: 31 Aug 2011
Location: Peak District & Cornwall
Posts: 1826

United Kingdom 2001 Defender 90 Td5 HT Oslo Blue
22900013A wrote:
I actually think most folk acknowledge the new model had to change, they/we just feel it did not have to change quite so much nor grow in the direction it did.

I think the idea of change being opposed at every turn is not much more than a myth, all the complaints about electronics, td5, tdi etc I have no memory of from the times they came out.

When I read things like "everyone opposed the TD5 when it came out because of electronics/complexity" I think - where was this, because I never saw it?!

The new one I'm afraid has caused such opposition because it doesnt really have any obvious connection to the old either in vehicle type or intended buyer, and especially in the styling. The fact the "influencers" have to keep reminding us of its strong DNA link etc etc only serves to confirm it doesnt have any.


I went to the launch event at Gordon Lamb, Chesterfield. I was completely underwhelmed by the Defender 110. It was very similar to my D4, but narrower, less room, poor 3rd row seat space and way more lower door/bumper plastic.

The switch gear next to the gear stick seemed very poorly laid out and I’ve no idea how you’d operate it when driving over tough terrain.

The rear load space was covered with very flimsy panels and the 3rd row seats were equally flimsy.

A D4 would be a much better Defender than this new Defender.

So sad.... Big Cry

Cheers

Simon
Post #806094 13th Dec 2019 7:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  Back to top
Page 134 of 351 <123 ... 133134135 ... 349350351>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums