↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Odd join in the exhaust
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
nick345345



Member Since: 05 Dec 2016
Location: Dunbar
Posts: 71

Scotland 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Baltic Blue
Odd join in the exhaust
Hi there, I've got a 2013 2.2 TDCI 110 USW. Got a new rattle yesterday which today I've tracked down to what seems to be a failed join in the front part of the exhaust. This is a picture, just ahead of the gearbox cross member (I think that's what it's called). It appears that a sleeve has been put over the exhaust and clamped either side of a join.

As far as I can tell from looking at the parts diagrams for a 110 exhaust there shouldn't be a join there. Is that right? Anyone else seen anything like this? And final question, any idea what parts I'd need to replace the join?

Many thanks

Nick



Click image to enlarge
Post #671239 16th Dec 2017 3:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zsd-puma



Member Since: 09 Aug 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 2720

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
Quote:
seems to be a failed join in the front part of the exhaust


I don't think there is much 'seems' about that, it's definitely failed. Laughing

Looks like someone has cut it to take the gearbox out (probably for a clutch replacement) and then shoved one of these over it to put it back together.
https://www.eurocarparts.com/search/712110...gIQ7_D_BwE

Probably easier just to get someone to weld it for you as it doesn't look like the repair sleeve lasted well.
Post #671370 16th Dec 2017 11:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20504

United Kingdom 
Definitely non standard as OE exhaust has flanges.
I would go for a Stainless, sleeve or flexi join and use Stainless clamps and sealing paste.

Cannot see an legit reason as to why an exhaust would be cut, if the flanges are shot replacement is due.
If removal with seized fixings for access cut bolts off and replace, or replace exhaust. No Guts, No Glory.
🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇮🇪🇺🇸⛽️🛢️⚙️🧰💪
Post #671373 17th Dec 2017 12:04am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ericvv



Member Since: 02 Jun 2011
Location: Near the Jet d'Eau
Posts: 5816

Switzerland 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SVX Station Wagon Santorini Black
Post #671418 17th Dec 2017 9:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zsd-puma



Member Since: 09 Aug 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 2720

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
Even the stainless will go brown that close to the manifold. In this photo we can't actually see much of the exhuast just the rusty old clamp.

Quote:
Cannot see an legit reason as to why an exhaust would be cut, if the flanges are shot replacement is due.
If removal with seized fixings for access cut bolts off and replace, or replace exhaust.


On the 2.2 the DPF wont fit past the chassis rail without moving the engine, so i reckon someone has chopped it so they can drop the gearbox out for a clutch change to save time. Not the way i would have done it mind you.
Post #671421 17th Dec 2017 10:23am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ARC99



Member Since: 19 Feb 2013
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 1831

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Cairns Blue
I would have thought that there would be more than just a "rattle" with that size of gap. Don't make old people mad.
We don't like being old in the first place,
so it doesn't take much to Censored us off.

Richard
Post #671427 17th Dec 2017 10:59am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
discomog



Member Since: 09 May 2015
Location: Notts/Lincs Border
Posts: 2531

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
The OEM exhaust on my 2015 Puma 2.2 is definitely not stainless, well certainly not austenitic as I've done a magnetic test on it. Doubt vey much that JLR would use ferritic stainless for its exhaust systems Defender 90XS SW
Mini Countryman Cooper S
Morgan Plus 8
Post #671430 17th Dec 2017 11:11am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ginjez



Member Since: 18 Sep 2011
Location: huddersfield
Posts: 1763

2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 ST Santorini Black
Did you ever get to polish the tail pipe Alan?
Post #671462 17th Dec 2017 2:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nick345345



Member Since: 05 Dec 2016
Location: Dunbar
Posts: 71

Scotland 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Baltic Blue
ARC99 wrote:
I would have thought that there would be more than just a "rattle" with that size of gap.


Very Happy indeed. The photo was after I'd been 'investigating'. Before that it was still just about attached, albeit on it's last legs.
Post #671470 17th Dec 2017 3:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zsd-puma



Member Since: 09 Aug 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 2720

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
discomog wrote:
The OEM exhaust on my 2015 Puma 2.2 is definitely not stainless, well certainly not austenitic as I've done a magnetic test on it. Doubt vey much that JLR would use ferritic stainless for its exhaust systems


They don't tend to rot that quickly, so i think it probably is one of the low grades of magnetic stainless. The Jaguar ones are much the same, magnetic but seem to last a decade. The old mild steel ones you'd be lucky if they didn't need at least welding up for the 3rd MOT. Take the little back box in the rear wheel arch, the battering they get from road debris they shouldn't last 5 min but they don't seem to rust very quickly.
Post #671479 17th Dec 2017 4:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
UtilityTruck



Member Since: 09 Jan 2014
Location: Oxford
Posts: 463

United Kingdom 
I think the tip of my 2014 110 exhaust is SS, the rest is definitely regular old steel.

There are very very few manufacturers that fit stainless exhausts from the factory. 2014 Keswick Utility 2.2
Post #671486 17th Dec 2017 4:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
discomog



Member Since: 09 May 2015
Location: Notts/Lincs Border
Posts: 2531

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
Jeremy, yes I did polish the tailpipe, only used wire wool and autosol but came up quite well. Next time you suggest some work on my Defender, perhaps you'd like to actually do it for me Laughing Defender 90XS SW
Mini Countryman Cooper S
Morgan Plus 8
Post #671488 17th Dec 2017 4:51pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ginjez



Member Since: 18 Sep 2011
Location: huddersfield
Posts: 1763

2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 ST Santorini Black
I know I suffer from ocd when it comes to vehicle cleanliness but I couldn't work on yours - the simple reason being your ocd is worse than mine. Laughing
Post #671498 17th Dec 2017 5:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zsd-puma



Member Since: 09 Aug 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 2720

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
UtilityTruck wrote:
I think the tip of my 2014 110 exhaust is SS, the rest is definitely regular old steel.

There are very very few manufacturers that fit stainless exhausts from the factory.


It used to be rare, but it's pretty common these days. Citroen C5's for example had a complete non-magnetic stainless system from new back in 2004. L322's came with stainless from about 2007 i think. I think it's because adblue, eolys, etc (basically animal urine) has a tendency to hasten corrosion in mild steel so a lot of manufacturers switched to stainless to prevent the exhausts falling to bits in months. Hybrids also have stainless exhausts as they are more likely to suffer condensation collecting in them. I think most manufacturers have standardised to less corroding metals, even if it's only a very low grade stainless for all their cars in preparation for hybrid and future emissions systems. I suspect there is probably some sort of DOT or EU reg that says manufacturers have to take steps to ensure their vehicles remain compliant - ie, it's all very well a new car meeting emissions standards but failing 2 years later as the exhaust has rotted out.
I'll admit though, highly polished and mandrel bent 316 stainless exhaust systems are pretty rare from the factory. And even rarer used near to the manifold (it gets more brittle and less corrosion resistant when heated).

It also depends what you want to call stainless and mild steel though. You can have steel which doesn't have enough chrome in it to make it 'officially' stainless steel, but it's not really what you could call mild steel either. But if we're going to be that picky, then no 'stainless' steel is actually stainless. Steel is actually an alloy and like any alloy it can be made in different compositions. It's a bit like "Sterling Silver" can't officially be called just 'Silver' as it's only 92.5% pure. Or you buy cars with alloy wheels, when in fact all car wheels are made frome some sort of alloy.
Post #671505 17th Dec 2017 5:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums