↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Extended wheel arches- which ones?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
fordy103



Member Since: 22 Dec 2010
Location: preston lancs
Posts: 85

2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Zermatt Silver
Extended wheel arches- which ones?
Was just looking at extended arches as my tyres stick out a bit now, and was just wondering if anybody had any suggestions?
i need them extended by 1-2 inches really

was thinking about these
http://www.mm-4x4.com/defender----range-ro...3499-p.asp

Opinions?
Post #65846 1st Apr 2011 9:21am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
fekete



Member Since: 24 Dec 2008
Location: Here on the other end of the computer
Posts: 3626

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Bonatti Grey
http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic5309.html NEVER TAKE LIFE SERIOUSLY. NOBODY GETS OUT ALIVE ANYWAY
Post #65905 1st Apr 2011 4:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
fordy103



Member Since: 22 Dec 2010
Location: preston lancs
Posts: 85

2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Zermatt Silver
they look good to be fair, however, they still wouldnt be any good for mine, as at the moment, when it articulates with the 305's on, it catches the arches really badly, so need to extend the whole arch so the tyre can go inside when articulated, if that makes sense !

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=101...mp;theater

you can kinda see how far the wheels go inside the arch, and thats with 265's fitted Big Cry

so yee, i think some wider arches and might have to cut some of the metal wings out aswell to stop it catching!

problem is i need a forlift or a really big rock to get it on full articulation!
Post #65909 1st Apr 2011 4:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
fekete



Member Since: 24 Dec 2008
Location: Here on the other end of the computer
Posts: 3626

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Bonatti Grey
You will have to go with the big black plastic type they still look good i think Thumbs Up NEVER TAKE LIFE SERIOUSLY. NOBODY GETS OUT ALIVE ANYWAY
Post #65910 1st Apr 2011 5:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Lorryman100



Member Since: 01 Oct 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 2686

fordy103 wrote:
they look good to be fair, however, they still wouldnt be any good for mine, as at the moment, when it articulates with the 305's on, it catches the arches really badly, so need to extend the whole arch so the tyre can go inside when articulated, if that makes sense !

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=101...mp;theater

you can kinda see how far the wheels go inside the arch, and thats with 265's fitted Big Cry

so yee, i think some wider arches and might have to cut some of the metal wings out aswell to stop it catching!

problem is i need a forlift or a really big rock to get it on full articulation!



Fordy, I have 305's on mine with standard L/R springs (2009 110 CSW XS) and they don't catch the wheel arches on full articulation. They are close but do clear. Fekete's option is smart as it looks standard and the fitting is hidden in the arch. The plastic ones involve drilling the wing to allow fixing, which means they are on for good. I have in the garage Old Man OME 2751 and 2755 springs to go on once I fit a roof rack and winch to compensate for the extra weight, maybe this route will save having to modify the wings and arches?
Post #65914 1st Apr 2011 5:37pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
fordy103



Member Since: 22 Dec 2010
Location: preston lancs
Posts: 85

2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Zermatt Silver
aye but ive got a challenge suspension kit fitted, so the articulation is a hell of a lot more than standard, so i think i need some drastic measure's to sort it. Ive already ripped a standard wheel arch off about a month ago with 265's fitted on a pay and play day.
So ye, bit stuck really, the obvious answer is to go for some QT services challenge arches, but they look S@$%^ in my opinion!
Post #65975 2nd Apr 2011 9:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums