Home > Wheels & Tyres > Tyre Size Opinions |
|
|
JOW240725 Member Since: 04 May 2015 Location: Suffolk Posts: 7905 |
I'm not sure you'll get a definitive answer, just lots of opinions either way. I personally went for 265's as ours is mainly used on the road I thought a little extra rubber on the tarmac would help. It has however reduced the turning circle slightly.
I think narrower 235 would possibly be better in the mud to cut through the surface. James MY2012 110 2.2TDCi XS SW Orkney Grey - http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic43410.html MY1990 110 200TDi SW beautifully faded Portofino Red - https://www.defender2.net/forum/post743641.html#743641 MY1984 90 V8 Slate Grey - https://www.defender2.net/forum/post744557.html#744557 Instagram @suffolk_rovers |
||
7th Sep 2017 10:13am |
|
Djcla Member Since: 29 Jul 2017 Location: Gloucestershire Posts: 469 |
thanks im only really looking for opinions as its a lot of cash to get it wrong. i was originally thinking 265 for on road handling but now im not sure lol
|
||
7th Sep 2017 10:28am |
|
Swine&Small Member Since: 20 Mar 2017 Location: Norfolk Posts: 1223 |
Hello, Contrary ,it seems , to most others, I prefer the 235's. More than adequate for the normal on/off road use but without the extra road noise of the 265's.
Bet that has opened a can of worms ? Swine 1983 Series 3 Pick up in Marine Blue 1967 Morris Traveller 1966 Morris Convertible 2012 VW T5 Camper Quod Abundat Non Obstat. |
||
7th Sep 2017 11:23am |
|
Coatesyyy Member Since: 07 Sep 2017 Location: Knutsford Posts: 423 |
I've ran both 265 and 235's and would go back to 235's. Much less road noise in my opinion!!
|
||
7th Sep 2017 12:25pm |
|
DSC-off Member Since: 16 Oct 2014 Location: North East Posts: 1404 |
235 's will use less fuel, have better steering feel and are better in most UK off-road conditions.
|
||
7th Sep 2017 6:27pm |
|
camelman Member Since: 27 Feb 2013 Location: Peak District Posts: 3372 |
I've run ATs, MTs, 235s, 255s 265s 285s 305s and 7.50s over the last 30+ years across deserts, in the arctic and boggy mountain sides.
Other than the physical 'will they fit' arguments, for uk driving unless you're off roading in thick mud every day, where I'd run 7.50 or 2.35 MTs, I'd say: MT's are noticeably noisier than AT's. None of the widths / profiles mentioned have greatly affected the handling or fuel consumption drastically one way or the other, they're still bolted to an ancient, top heavy, relatively slow truck that doesn't like going around corners too fast and drinks loads of fuel. MT's can be scary in ice, winter rated AT's are MUCH better.... Whatever the width, let them down in sand and you'll be fine. I've regularly had 70k+ miles out of a good set of tyres (MT and AT) so it can be worth spending a bet extra up front to get what you want My mates drove down to Cape Town 20 years ago in a London cab on road tyres...... |
||
7th Sep 2017 6:53pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis