Home > Off Topic > Roads safer without central white lines? |
|
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17443 |
Imagine the M25, especially the ultra-wide sections, with no lane markings!
|
||
4th Feb 2016 7:09pm |
|
mick Member Since: 08 Feb 2010 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 2109 |
That be good just zoom in & out of the traffic
|
||
4th Feb 2016 8:28pm |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17443 |
So no change then!
|
||
4th Feb 2016 9:23pm |
|
Thor Member Since: 17 Dec 2011 Location: Didcot Posts: 446 |
A bit of miss interpretation there mate, I recall a discussion was had in a BMW 530i with my instructor on my advanced driving course a few years back. It's the wording; Broken white line - should not enter Solid white line - MUST NOT enter Should not because it could be dangerous. Must not because it IS dangerous. On both my advanced car and advanced bike courses, refreshers and tests I have used areas with "hazard warning lines spaced by hatches" to make progress (overtake) when the conditions (weather, traffic, pedestrians etc) have been safe to do so. Had I entered an area hatches outlined with solid lines, I would've been off the course! It's worth noting that not all rules of the Highway Code are enforced by law. In the book, those that are, are in red from memory. Even the Police and other emergency services do not have exemption in law to cross solid white lines, except for the example given in the code re certain vehicles travelling less than 10mph. As someone who does a lot of miles, day and night, normally on two wheels, is on occasions allowed to exceed the speed limit I think white road markings are an essential part of what keeps me and others safe*. * Except on the bike in the rain......White paint becomes very slippery. I now dismount my high horse to get ready to use white lines at 04:30 Strong people are harder to kill and generally more useful! |
||
4th Feb 2016 10:17pm |
|
leeds Member Since: 28 Dec 2009 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 8582 |
The report is discussing the removal of white lines in areas where the speed limit is 30mph or less.
So lane markings will not be disappearing from the M25 soon. Would I be happy with the removal of white lines in the UK? I would argue the opposite and suggest two things. Driving standards need to be improved so people know what white lines actually mean and that white lines need to be repainted in many areas. One of my regular routes is on a minor road in a 30mph zone, no central white line which is wide enough for two vehicles to pass say at 20mph each vehicle. It is amazing that some car drivers can not actually cope with this situation! It is not unusual to see people turn right from a main road into a minor road and not only pass over the give way sign. Have seen vehicles do that sort of right turn and have their nearside wheels on the wrong side of the central line!. Remove the centre line of the main road where a minor road joins it and this will confuse certain drivers as the centre line is the advanced give way line for vehicles wanting to turn right out of the minor road. Brendan |
||
4th Feb 2016 11:14pm |
|
Swac3 Member Since: 21 Feb 2015 Location: Aberdeen Posts: 363 |
May as well remove them from most roundabouts anyway as people round here don't seem to be able to stay inside them, I'm not generally a greedy person but I don't like sharing my lane with asshats. 3 Landrovers
|
||
4th Feb 2016 11:37pm |
|
Swac3 Member Since: 21 Feb 2015 Location: Aberdeen Posts: 363 |
Confused me a bit there Brendan Do you mean nearside wheels on the wrong side of the centre line of the minor road they just turned off into ? If so then i'm one of those people, if the visibility into said minor road permits and I'm leaving the main route, saves both me and the cars behind slowing unnecessarily so I can complete a low speed 90 degree turn. 3 Landrovers |
||
4th Feb 2016 11:53pm |
|
leeds Member Since: 28 Dec 2009 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 8582 |
Yes I do mean the nearside wheels on the wrong side of the centre line.
I am confused by you slowing unnecessary to do a slow speed 90 degree turn?? IF you have a long trailer behind I can see the corner being cut, however in most cases cutting the corner so badly in my opinion is both sloppy and dangerous driving. Around here lots of high dry stone walls so visibility down the minor road is normally poor until you are on top of the junction. People around here have difficulty seeing a two tonne Defender when they execute their bad cornering. What chance have they got of seeing a sports car or a kid on a bike? When I was taught to drive I was told that there was an invisible concrete post in the centre of the road , at the corner of the give way sign and the centre line and you had to avoid it. Am convinced one day I will take out a drivers door in this situation. Brendan |
||
5th Feb 2016 12:24am |
|
Swac3 Member Since: 21 Feb 2015 Location: Aberdeen Posts: 363 |
What I meant is, I commute home on a busy 60mph limit road and on reaching my usual junction to turn right into a more minor road I indicate and slow, so long as there's no approaching traffic on the main carriageway AND the junction on the right I turn into is clear then I brake less, turn in early crossing the centre line and continue on my way, slowing less than if i'd executed a right turn at 90 degrees to avoid smashing into the mythical invisible concrete post.
As you say not all junctions are safe to do so, but likewise others are. crossing lines isn't in itself either dangerous or illegal (depending on specifics naturally of the markings and situation) As an aside, what they teach you for your test as an inexperienced driver and what is both legal and acceptable aren't the same. 3 Landrovers |
||
5th Feb 2016 1:09am |
|
Cupboard Member Since: 21 Mar 2014 Location: Suffolk Posts: 2971 |
Heh, I do that if I can see the junction is clear.
Double white lines "unless it is necessary"; broken lined chevrons "unless it is necessary"; solid lined chevrons "unless it is an emergency". On the other hand "MUST NOT cross" followed by "may cross", then for chevrons "should not" and "MUST NOT". They seem to be saying they're not for overtaking unlike the single dashed lines which they're fine about you overtaking on. Either way, I'm not going to be overtaking on them and you're perfectly capable of reading the road to drive safely without them! I can't see a reason that it might be "necessary" to cross the lines that isn't covered in the caveat in Rule 129. Hey ho, yay for ambiguity.
I have a very well used high horse, although the mounting block is less well used as I'm apt to stay on it. |
||
7th Feb 2016 4:56pm |
|
Swac3 Member Since: 21 Feb 2015 Location: Aberdeen Posts: 363 |
Should not, is in this case aimed at liability decisions,
But could also be used if the police decide to do you for say dangerous/reckless driving for example, which are both really 'subjective' and then the RTA defines it using a bunch of other subjective qualifying criteria , (a)the way he drives falls far below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver, and . (b)it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving in that way would be dangerous. So just who is the mythical "competent and careful driver" I think I'm both of those and its likely most of you would think the same of yourselves. /hmm 3 Landrovers |
||
7th Feb 2016 10:32pm |
|
jimbob7 Member Since: 06 Jul 2013 Location: uk Posts: 2055 |
....I forgot to add a favourite saying of mine "replace the airbag with a sharp,steel spike",watch people's attention increase 100,000%,no? Pov.spec,ftw. 2006, 110,TD5.
|
||
8th Feb 2016 3:24pm |
|
jimbob7 Member Since: 06 Jul 2013 Location: uk Posts: 2055 |
Rule no.2!! Pov.spec,ftw. 2006, 110,TD5.
|
||
8th Feb 2016 3:24pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis