↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > Couldn't be more off topic if I tried...
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
need4speed



Member Since: 23 Nov 2012
Location: Kilmarnock
Posts: 746

Couldn't be more off topic if I tried...
...but I would like some opinion on this.

Regarding the recent New York balcony collapse. A few things upset me about this because I sense someone's ass is about to be put out on a sling over this..

The ex Irish PM has just said that she's appalled by reports by the NY Times that claim the students were drunk and had caused damage to other buildings. That irritates me because it's probably bloody true! Anyone been in student campuses when there's a party going on?

But here's what really bothers me. They now claim that the collapse was due to rotten timber giving way due to water damage. That's troubling me because that implies they are gearing up to nail someone for not doing their job properly.

But here's the thing: Students are supposed to have a modicum of intelligence right? So who here would think it a wise move to have 13 students (no doubt jumping up and down) crammed onto a small balcony several floors up?? All brains and no common sense.

Tragedy? Absolutely. They're own fault???
Post #431879 18th Jun 2015 10:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Caterham



Member Since: 06 Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6312

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
common sense is becoming a black art of years gone by.....

I've no doubt someone will cop it. I doubt there will have been any warning signs in place to suggest a maximum number of persons on the balcony at any one time nor a warning to avoid jumping up / down and to that end the building managers are I suspect in the firing line.

a bit like having hot water coming out of the hot tap - best put a warning label on it to warn people that the water might just be hot.

reminds me of the warning that came with my bike about the brakes not working which could result in injury or death?

worlds gone mad due to the lack of common sense that and 'where there's blame there's a claim' and all that.

also reminds me of the saying 'the lights are flashing, the barriers down but there's no train coming' ....

maybe the wood was rotten and in a few more years the same thing would have happened with just 4 people on the balcony - don't know, it's just another sad accident unfortunately.
Post #431882 18th Jun 2015 10:21am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
need4speed



Member Since: 23 Nov 2012
Location: Kilmarnock
Posts: 746

Yes I know what you mean,

I remember years ago at work someone tried to sue the company because they got burned putting they're arm over a boiling kettle.. Unbelievable. Needless to say they were told not to be so bloody silly. Especially as it was him who had just put the kettle on moments before!

Need to put a sign on everything for these doughballs.

For example: never point loaded gun at oneself... Etc etc
Post #431884 18th Jun 2015 10:46am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
need4speed wrote:
...But here's the thing: Students are supposed to have a modicum of intelligence right? So who here would think it a wise move to have 13 students (no doubt jumping up and down) crammed onto a small balcony several floors up?? All brains and no common sense. Tragedy? Absolutely. They're own fault???


I agree as undoubtedly millions of others do as well.

With the amount of fatalities and injured personnel and seeing the size of the balcony the exact same thought must have crossed the minds of thousands of sensible and sober people who witnessed the report on tne news. If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #431889 18th Jun 2015 11:09am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grenadier



Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5877

France 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey
A very sad incident, but you are wholly correct. Sadly we live in a litigious, 'where there's blame there's a claim' society. If you climb a tree, fall out and break something, it's your fault, no-one else's. If you climb a ladder and fall off, likewise. If you trip on a pavement, you're the moron for not watching where you're going (or focussing on texting). This in turn leads to a raft of idiotic bans, such as playing conkers at school or changing lightbulbs at work. (We weren't even allowed to do it in the Army, but we were allowed to go to war and be shot at/blown up/both). WTF? Big Cry I am sure we could all offer similar examples.

Nobody takes responsibility for their own actions anymore.

Sadly this blame culture means we all get shafted on insurance, teachers are too afraid to take kids on trips and accidents that do merit forensic investigation and litigation such as the recent roller-coaster accident at Alton Towers, get lost in the stupid flurry of claims for all manner of self-induced injury. Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey
Post #431898 18th Jun 2015 12:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Rickydodah



Member Since: 14 Jul 2014
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1091

At work I often get involved with negligence issues. The overbearing criteria is the phrase "reasonably foreseeable". Was it reasonably foreseeable that all those people on a small balcony would be cause for concern. For those people involved they're classed as lay people, those who only have a general intelligence of any issues. The architect will have expert intelligence. Was it reasonably foreseeable for the architect to think that this tragic situation would arise, if so then it was his responsiblility to design in sufficient strength to avoid a collapse. In the UK any negligence, and this would likely fall under criminal negligence would invariably be decided by the Coroner's court verdict on the cause of death. If the verdict was accidental death then basically anything that happened was not reasonably foreseeable and no blame is attributed. I've never dealt with the U.S. But I'd imagine their system is compatible to ours. Confused I started with nothing and still have most of it left!
Post #431902 18th Jun 2015 12:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums