Home > In Car Electronics > Thoughts on Stereo |
|
|
consumerize Member Since: 27 May 2014 Location: Berkshire Posts: 121 |
I helped a friend install a Sub woofer into his defender 90 2007 with rear seats last weekend. He had replaced the stock speakers with Focal's with the separate tweeters up on the dash, and the rear speakers.
The head unit had already been replaced with a pretty decent DAB radio / IPOD / USB player Without the Sub, the vocals give a nice crisp sound, but there was no base to speak of. Sounded a bit tinny. He installed a Kenwood KSC-SW11 powered sub. just wide enough to snugly screw onto the back of the cubby box. it has a built in amp, came with all the cables (minus RCA cables). Dead easy to fit. For a compact unit gave an excellent sound. all wires hidden away. Really neat option. Was about £110 i believe. |
||
12th May 2015 4:20pm |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
Thanks for the reply, out of interest what focals size did he fit in the back? Did they have separate tweeters are all in one unit? I think 5 inch or 130mm is about as big as you can get in the rear?
The sub I suppose is the default position seen a lot of them fitted to the back of the Cubby box I guess that's why LR fit the Alpine unit there. |
||
13th May 2015 8:59am |
|
DaveGL Member Since: 19 Dec 2014 Location: Surrey Posts: 57 |
Hi Snowy
I was the friend in question I fitted the ISN100s and the PC100s - have to say, not that impressed with them, I think at the end of the day the 4" speakers are just too small. As Glyn said, they sound very crisp, but don't have the volume or any bass. The addition of the Kenwood sub improved the setup greatly, but I would suggest you add some larger speakers if you can. The thread where this is all discussed in more detail is here: http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic36854.html Cheers |
||
13th May 2015 9:14am |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
That's really helpful thanks,
I will be fitting the Focal 100 KRS up front but I think as everyone said its all about trying to get some bass in there. Not sure how to describe it but I wonder if anyone has tried to fit speakers in the area shown on the photo's They are about 8/9 inches clear and 7 inches deep? so doubt if a small 8 inch sub would fit? |
||
13th May 2015 9:34am |
|
H3nry Member Since: 08 Jan 2014 Location: Heathrow Posts: 134 |
Hi Snowy,
Why not modify the cubby box, and put the 8" subwoofer at the back of it? |
||
13th May 2015 12:17pm |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
Hi
I did think about that, but we have alsorts of stuff in there and its quite useful, so would really want to reduce its internal volume but also I recon it would rattle and vibrate a lot. The lid vibrates as it is. Anyone get unintentional vibrations from the "underseat" type subs bolted to the back of the cubby? |
||
13th May 2015 12:25pm |
|
scotiach Member Since: 19 Nov 2014 Location: 5603 Posts: 36 |
The little sub on the back of the cubby does vibrate the cupholders in mine if you don't limit the frequency to <80hz, which is plenty for the sub anyway. Above that it can get a bit boomy and you're playing a good chunk of your music mono.
6.5"s do fit in the stock locations right at the back with some 'trimming' of the plastic covers - depth is not too bad back there. If you have 3rd row passengers alot (like my kids) then a coax of that size would be considerate for them. I fitted a pair of Pioneer TSE1702is. But singing voices are never going to get into the tweeter range >3khz anyway, and the tweeter frequencies are very directional, so you'll sacrifice some front staging. I'm about to cut the higher tweeter frequencies from these and see what it's like for them. No need to spend loads of money back there I would say. Ideally you should get a modern head unit with time alignment, 3 pairs of pre-amp outs and your 4 channel genesis are OK if your cubby sub is active. 4" speakers in the stock locations actually sound OK, as most of the audible sound from them seems to come from the rear of the speakers up through the dash out through the window vent, definitely go for a component set and use the stock tweeter location, to have the stage 'raised' even more. The problem you'll have is a frequency 'hole' of a few dbs above where your sub plays well and below where your mids play well. I've been testing mine and the hole is at 100hz exactly. The cubby sub provides more than enough bass balance (tested on a RTA) for 100w to each mid/component channel. You could build a box for a pair of 8s but you almost certainly don't need to for decent sound quality. You can fit 5.25s (130mm) up front with some trimming work. Remember either way you'll need to find space for the crossovers if you fit a component set. Not easy up there. Just my 2p as I have gone through this/am going through this still. |
||
13th May 2015 2:12pm |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
Hi Scotiach
That's more than helpful, I think 165mm at the rear would be very useful and yes I will have passengers at the rear so probably a good idea. I will probably go for a component set so I can experiment with and without the tweeter. My knowledge of amps installs dates back to my "boy racer" days in my Mk 3 escort but why 3 preamp outs? My CD500 only has 2 My plan was to run the genesis to run front and rear speakers? would this need more than one pre-amp input? I not the genesis has two lots of inputs? Then possible either a another amp/sub set up? or standard under seat sub? another preamp output Or am I missing something |
||
13th May 2015 3:35pm |
|
scotiach Member Since: 19 Nov 2014 Location: 5603 Posts: 36 |
You'll need to use both preout channels to both input channels on the genesis to be able to use the fader and to control hpf for front and rear independently from the hu. the genesis output channel pairs power front and rear. this means you are missing a controllable output channel from the hu for the active sub (no amp channel needed).
A good hu nowadays has 3 preout pairs (or 4) and time alignment, and at leat 16 channel eq on both sides. Costs ca 200 quid. eg Pioneer deh 80 prs. cubby sub from alpine or pioneer 200 quid. your genesis amp is top stuff so use that. canles, connectors, stock rear box sealing, etc another 100. front components- your choice.... upwards of 100 or so? next level is soundproofing the whole car or the floor at least. then spend all your time fiddling with the settings, discovering the joys of pink noise and resisting 'upgrades' |
||
13th May 2015 5:54pm |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
That's an Awsome response thanyou, I completely understand.
Thanks for that. Re sound proofing the rear is carpeted and has some proofing but when I pull out the front seats and cubby for cables etc the plan is to apply some more proofing and carpet as it currently has the rubber foam backed Land rover stuff. Any thoughts on whether its worth upgrading the speaker cable? With Home stereo I have had people always saying upgrade to a decent speaker cables and interconnects, does the same apply to car systems. Thanks Chris |
||
14th May 2015 8:49am |
|
scotiach Member Since: 19 Nov 2014 Location: 5603 Posts: 36 |
In a car the environment is so poor for sq that the cable is the least of your problems. For safety, make sure that the cable cross section area is sufficient to handle the watts over the given distance. Not an issue for you for the setup you describe, but if you throw a thousand watts at a sub at the back then thicker wire would be less prone to heat (resistance) - there are online calculators for that. Easiest way to wire the amp up to the front and rear component crossovers is to run good speaker wire from the amp to back behind the hu (same path opposite direction to the rca cables) and splice each wire (4) into the corresponding existing loom wires for each corner's speaker. Colours are in the wiring diagram. Then you don't have to pull the dash and the head liner. Next time I'll do it 'right' and pull it all out and wire it all but only when the equipment justifies the hassle.
|
||
14th May 2015 6:49pm |
|
Snowy90 Member Since: 23 Feb 2015 Location: Surrey Posts: 482 |
That sounds like a top tip.
ALso I did pully out the Nak HU to see what I had and it turns out I have 2 direct RCA outputs front and rear plus a smaller connection with 2 RC leads for SW subwoofer So it looks like I can keep the Nak if I can live with the skipping and no blue tooth. Clearly it wont have time delay but from what I have read and heard its a sweet HU so may persist with that for now. |
||
15th May 2015 2:28pm |
|
scotiach Member Since: 19 Nov 2014 Location: 5603 Posts: 36 |
Cool. Won't cost anything to try it, and the hu is easily replaced further down the line. The old Naks were/are very decent.
|
||
18th May 2015 8:12am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis