Home > Puma (Tdci) > Is a Puma significantly better than a TD5? |
|
|
Naks Member Since: 27 Jan 2009 Location: Stellenbosch, ZA Posts: 2638 |
the only way the Td5 was better than the Puma is that it kept me awake on long journeys. I find the creamier engine note of the Puma makes me sleepy
|
||
23rd Jul 2010 11:27am |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4662 |
1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
24th Jul 2010 3:43pm |
|
spudfan Member Since: 10 Sep 2007 Location: Co Donegal Posts: 4662 |
Sorry about that, made a mess of that post. Anyway I endorse the above 100%. Would buy another tomorrow funds permitting! 1982 88" 2.25 diesel 1992 110 200tdi csw -Zikali 2008 110 2.4 tdci csw-Zulu 2011 110 2.4 tdci csw-Masai |
||
24th Jul 2010 3:45pm |
|
MK Member Since: 28 Aug 2008 Location: Santiago Posts: 2415 |
Defenetly not. Puma 110" SW
............................................................. Earth first. Other planets later |
||
24th Jul 2010 4:27pm |
|
K9F Member Since: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Bournemouth Posts: 9610 |
As indicated by the posts "One man's rubbish is another man's treasure!" it is difficult to find a definitive answer by people's loyalty to their own marque of vehicle! Explain your dilemma to your local dealer or hire a Puma for a couple o' days and take it for a long and varied journey you'll soon be able to decide for yourself! Maybe just maybe the dealers will give you one on loan if they think they'll get a sale out of it! If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!! Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!! |
||
24th Jul 2010 6:41pm |
|
bpman Member Since: 21 May 2008 Location: Oslo Posts: 8069 |
i've had a 200tdi, td5 and a puma.
200tdi had issues with the front pully td5 sounds the best puma is the most refined, because of engine, 6 speed box, quieter, better seats, better ventilation and aircon |
||
25th Jul 2010 8:37am |
|
Happyoldgit Member Since: 14 Sep 2007 Location: Norfolk Posts: 3471 |
Over several decades I've owned and used many models of Land Rover including virtually every model of 90 / 110 / Defender. I choose the vehicles for a reason meaning that they are not a trendy lifestyle choice for me. Like any vehicle they've all had their faults but I like the Puma the best.
|
||
29th Jul 2010 8:12am |
|
MK Member Since: 28 Aug 2008 Location: Santiago Posts: 2415 |
I understand better in the broad sense, including reliability and it would be nice to look at some statistics on the Td5 model after 3 years of being in the market. I´m sure LR has those numbers. Puma 110" SW
............................................................. Earth first. Other planets later |
||
29th Jul 2010 10:55am |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
I hate to say your in the minority when it comes to the TD5 being better. For info on LR - they certainly run warranty tests on parts (eg handle opening test 1,000 of times) and the whole car - these are mileage driven (no pun) and for equiv. of years and hard use. You are likely never to see that detail of stats Mike |
||
29th Jul 2010 4:09pm |
|
MK Member Since: 28 Aug 2008 Location: Santiago Posts: 2415 |
Actually I´m not saying the Td5 is better (never had one) but I often hear stories about Pumas rather than Td5`s from a local mining company giving very hard use to their landies. Puma 110" SW
............................................................. Earth first. Other planets later |
||
29th Jul 2010 5:01pm |
|
pbob Member Since: 09 Jul 2009 Location: Mudgee NSW Posts: 20 |
It's all about preferences, but I would not have bought a Puma if it had remained the same as a TD5. In Australia at least, long distances mean some changes have become important - namely, better seating, an air con that doesn't appear to be an afterthought, 6 speeds with a new engine that means faster modern touring with very good fuel economy and best of all, a very torquey motor. About the only thing in a TD5 that appeared to be up with the current trend of motoring is the TD5 engine which is good. I must admit this comes from a long time disco driver (1 D1, 3 D2s and an HSE D3). So maybe my creature comforts come from past experience - the Puma now sits not too far behind the levels of a D2, and well ahead of a TD5 or earlier Defender.
|
||
2nd Aug 2010 12:51am |
|
Froogle-Yorkshireman Member Since: 10 Jul 2010 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 350 |
Well having had a Puma for a whole 3 days now and previously owning a TD5 for 2+ years I can confirm that IMHO the Puma knocks the spots off the TD5.
Mrs Froogle also agrees although she is disappointed that the vents are missing in the Puma Anyone thinking about getting a Puma, stop thinking, just do it! Proud owner 110 Utility XS Ex RR Sport HST V8 Ex Td5 90 |
||
2nd Aug 2010 5:05pm |
|
MK Member Since: 28 Aug 2008 Location: Santiago Posts: 2415 |
I would like to know what the people using it as it was concieved for are saying? Like in the middle of the Atacama or Aussie deserts. Puma 110" SW
............................................................. Earth first. Other planets later |
||
2nd Aug 2010 10:39pm |
|
BogMonster Member Since: 05 Feb 2008 Location: Stanley Posts: 400 |
I have a 06MY export spec 300Tdi but have driven many Td5s and Pumas and the Puma is miles better in almost every respect, the only bit I don't like is that I have yet to drive one where the gearbox doesn't get a bit clacky when it gets really hot, so does the R380 but not as bad and you would think in this day and age of one finger gearchanges on everything else on the planet that LR could get this bit right. Having said that in a Puma you can ignore the gear lever and stick it in 5th between about 30 and 60 anyway, it's just low speed stop start that is a bit tiresome.
|
||
10th Aug 2010 8:25pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis