Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Pro Comp Es 9000 +2" |
|
|
Phatcat Member Since: 01 Nov 2013 Location: W yorks Posts: 98 |
I had a set on mine and took them off after a year. IMHO they are cheap, poor quality. The vehicle handled like a pig on roller skates , and they were all rusty and tatty looking in no time.
If Bilstein or Koni are out of budget, I would look around for alternatives. If you didn't need +2, I'd put new puma take offs on. |
||
2nd Sep 2014 6:44am |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8043 |
spring height is the issue on the rear not shocks.
Procomp/Terrafirma are mcuh the same, good as a disposable item, ie fit them where you expect them to be damaged before they fail, ie back of off roader. seals go on both quite quick. save the money and get OMEs. Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
2nd Sep 2014 7:12am |
|
walfy Member Since: 29 Aug 2007 Location: Frome Posts: 2658 |
I used procomp on my challenge truck the entire time I used it. Never had an issue with them leaking or failing. They were quite hard and didn't give me the axle droop I wanted. But then I was never going to win comps in my truck so it didn't become such an issue.
Would I have them again. Yes, without doubt 110 D250 SE HT 110 USW SOLD RRE HSE Dynamic Gone, wife killed it VOLVO XC60 R Dynamic with some toys Polaris RZR 900XP SOLD |
||
2nd Sep 2014 11:05am |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8043 |
the stiffness was the springs being HDs. Cheers
James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
2nd Sep 2014 12:57pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis