↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > In defence of the DC100
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
Print this entire topic · 
timbar



Member Since: 30 Jul 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 245

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Just saw the Jeep Brute. Yep, that looks more like it. 2009 110 XS Station Wagon
Post #319254 26th Mar 2014 4:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Swollock



Member Since: 16 Mar 2013
Location: Wellingborough Northants
Posts: 262

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Bonatti Grey
Still think it looks like a Skoda Yeti on steroids. 2008 Defender 110 XS CSW
Volvo S60 T8
Triumph 1200 Rally Explorer
G0UBX
Post #319256 26th Mar 2014 4:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
22900013A



Member Since: 23 Dec 2010
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 3149

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Keswick Green
I think the LWB version looks ghastly from the side, rear overhang is too short, wheelbase too long. The swb version would look better with a slightly shorter wheelbase. Lets face it they need to be about 95" (the current 90 is 93") then a 110" and a 130".

I have to say I still can't see a cherrypicker on one, but then again they have been fitted to Ford Rangers.


Click image to enlarge


They are now all being replaced with Defenders - what does that tell us?

Admin note: this post has had its images recovered from a money grabbing photo hosting site and reinstated Mr. Green  2011 110 USW
1973 Series III 1-Ton
1972 Series III 1-Ton Cherrypicker
1969 IIA 1-Ton
1966 IIA 88"
Post #319268 26th Mar 2014 5:42pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
Cupboard



Member Since: 21 Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2971

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 HT Corris Grey
Birdy wrote:
Limey,

Nail, head. JLR isn’t building a vehicle for three-and-a-half tonne tugging farmers, explorers or military sales. It’s building a fashionable profit maker à la Evoque, with just enough Series/Defender nostalgia to appeal to the machismo and British-is-best brigade.

My favourite version is the yellow convertible that was doing the rounds in the USA, I could see myself cruising down the South of France in that. If the end-of-the line Defender is nothing more than a badge and some bits lying around on the parts shelf, the five hundred quid deposit I’ve lodged with my dealer will go towards a DC100.

Peter


The current Land Rover lineup has a large range of fashionable cars. In my opinion they don't need another one for the sake of it. The current lineup also has utility vehicles of various descriptions, chief of which is the Defender.
Without the Defender and with the DC100 as is, they will be almost entirely lacking in that area. That may be the plan, that may a good thing thing financially, who knows. Does alienate me though.

Maybe I'd be happier if they did a big toy (like the Jeep Wrangler and DC100) and a working farm/utility company/explorer of places never explored vehicle.
Post #319277 26th Mar 2014 6:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Sphere



Member Since: 26 Apr 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 725

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Keswick Green
I use mine defender for work and always have and really can't see why the dc100 can't be used for work if it does what it's ment to. My defender tows and I throw tools in the back and drive it across fields then hose the back out to go down the pub providing the dc100 can do that fine. Most of my mates run japs for work and they can't do all that but there still more popular
Post #319308 26th Mar 2014 8:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RobKeay



Member Since: 19 Jul 2009
Location: Stafford
Posts: 1579

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Corris Grey
I agree.

As long as it's capable of towing carrying five people and pulling itself and the trailer across site. I will be in. Hopefully be able to buy one without having to spend thousands in upgrades.
Post #319383 26th Mar 2014 10:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
a13x



Member Since: 25 Sep 2011
Location: Burton on Trent
Posts: 553

United Kingdom 
But the replacement isn't going to be in the Defender price bracket, the farmer/poverty spec atleast. I'm currently torn between a 2015 defender or it's replacement. Providing the replacement can have a roofrack for tent and awning, I'm sure it will be an amazing car with great offroad capability.

JLR know this replacement will be one of the biggest car releases in their history given the iconic status of the Defender and aren't about to cock it up,
Post #319442 27th Mar 2014 9:04am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
timbar



Member Since: 30 Jul 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 245

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
The Defender (well the Land Rover) was created out of necessity. Those same needs aren't driving the company any more. 2009 110 XS Station Wagon
Post #319444 27th Mar 2014 9:08am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums