Home > Technical > L405 (New RR) mpg vs Puma |
|
|
Glynparry25 Member Since: 16 Feb 2009 Location: Miserable Midlands Posts: 3015 |
I am with Rossy on this- computer MPG are MASSIVELY out all the time even if 'Set-up'. Things like speedo accuracy (normally +10%) will affect it
When I had a SG I set it up and even after that it was always wrong. I was apparently averaging 35-40mpg where realistically I was getting 24-28. I now use a iPod app that calculates it all from physical fuel and distance. Good to see they are more fuel efficitnt though Glyn |
||
30th Sep 2013 3:19pm |
|
jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 7979 |
i avg 1mpg better than the SG give me on its current set up from actual figures.
i agree that vehicle computers can be out, so lets assume it is 10% then, 46mpg it is....... Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
30th Sep 2013 3:52pm |
|
Cheshire110 Member Since: 26 Jul 2013 Location: Cheshire/London Posts: 2746 |
according to a few papers, the RR hybrid is returning 40mpg on the silk trail expedition, so over faily slow rough terrain - not bad!
lets face it the hybrid will only matter around town, and when you pay your road tax Cheers, David Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8. |
||
30th Sep 2013 5:08pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis