 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > 140bhp? |
 
|
|
|
| x-isle Member Since: 26 May 2011 Location: Midlands Posts: 1327   
|
I know that Topix can be wrong on many occasions, however, I've just realised that my 110 is stated as having a "2.4L DOHC HPCR DSL 140PS PUMA" engine.
I'm guessing this could just be the engine that is provided by Ford and is just listing it's capability before LR dump their map on the ECU. I think in the older Transits, the variable turbo was only an option on the 140bhp version. I'm sure it is on my Transit based Motorhome with the 140bhp 2.2 engine. Craig Rogers 2007 Puma 110 XS 2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux www.craigrogers.photography |
||
15th Apr 2013 8:57am |
|
| SiWhite Member Since: 19 Jan 2010 Location: North Hampshire Posts: 455  
|
I don't think that 1PS equals 1BHP... My blog - www.anacreinhampshire.blogspot.co.uk
110 TD5 BuildHERE - sold! 110 Tdci Build HERE - sold! Passat Alltrack - 4x4, auto, 45mpg, gloriously comfortable - but not a Defender! |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 9:16am |
|
| x-isle Member Since: 26 May 2011 Location: Midlands Posts: 1327
|
It doesn't, but it's near as damn it.
1bhp is 1.01ps. Craig Rogers 2007 Puma 110 XS 2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux www.craigrogers.photography |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 9:31am |
|
| Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298  
|
just a thought.....should it be KW not PS.....
I'm bhp doesn't = 1kw but off the top not sure which is greater (just a thought). |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 10:04am |
|
| x-isle Member Since: 26 May 2011 Location: Midlands Posts: 1327
|
1 bhp = 0.74kw if I remember correctly.
I think the standard Transit when they had the 2.4 Puma engine only had 90bhp, there where then various options of which 140bhp was one, the main difference was the introduction of the variable turbo which both 2.4 and 2.2 Puma Defenders have. This is why I think the engine is probably supplied as the 140bhp variant. Craig Rogers 2007 Puma 110 XS 2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux www.craigrogers.photography |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 10:23am |
|
| big steve Member Since: 24 Dec 2009 Location: hertfordshire Posts: 2456 
|
im 100% certain they only have 122hp from the factory and also the proof is here on the forum BAS has proved on many 2.2 cars that they only have 120ish hp ?
steve 2015 2.2 tdci hardtop xs 3.2 conversion DONE 238bhp and 707nm torque and thats just the start ;-P hybrid turbo in build -done ready to fit ashcroft atb in transfer box 6 speed auto in build |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 10:28am |
|
| Vera Member Since: 08 Oct 2012 Location: Nuneaton Posts: 130 
|
On most of the earlier 2.4 engined variants you'd see something like "90T250" on the front doors... mine had "125T250" for instance. My understaning is that the first number is the PS (90/125/140 etc) and the second is the bodystyle.. 250 being a MWB/Medium Roof... '09 SVX #200 '10 Morphy Richards.. I mean Prius |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 1:48pm |
|
| Porny Site Sponsor Member Since: 31 Aug 2009 Location: Sutton Coldfield - West Midlands Posts: 809 
|
Its a Ford 140PS spec engine - which means it has the higher flow injectors, the Variable Geometry Turbo with ERA, oil spray jets (for the pistons) and a couple of other features.
The Land Rover calibration is 122bhp (in theory - but you will never see this on a rolling road). Ian IRB The home of the first modified Keswick Green 90 - and the first 2.4 Puma through both the 200bhp and 550Nm barriers. www.IRBdevelopments.com www.facebook.com/irbdevelopments www.integrated316.com www.facebook.com/integrated316 |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 1:54pm |
|
| x-isle Member Since: 26 May 2011 Location: Midlands Posts: 1327
|
 As I thought!
 Thanks for clearing it up! Craig Rogers
2007 Puma 110 XS 2011 Evoque Coupe Dynamic Lux www.craigrogers.photography |
||
|
15th Apr 2013 2:04pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
