↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Best Cage protection - options?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
nickh90



Member Since: 19 Oct 2009
Location: Nr Horsham
Posts: 195

England 1989 Defender 90 V8 Petrol SW Auto Java Black
Best Cage protection - options?
Hi all,
I want to get some additional roll over protection. (not that I plan to need it!)

Want the aesthetics of an SVX style front hoop but not just a cosmetic one.. then what can I do for the rear? that would also allow me the flexibility to still make it a soft top later on should I wish..

Any ideas on types and who where to get it fitted in the South?

Thanks
Nick
Post #189472 29th Nov 2012 11:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Go Beyond



Member Since: 30 Jan 2012
Location: Headcorn, Kent
Posts: 6678

United Kingdom 
I have the Performance + Protection SVX style cage on my soft top 90.

It fits down to the chassis in six places.

I wouldn't say it was up to a serious, high speed roll over but would (hopefully) hold up in a gentle roll.

Probably best to have a chat with P + P because I'm sure they could supply two different sets of tubes where the outer and inner meet that would be suitable for a hardtop initially and then swap over when going to a soft top.

The other problem with their 'standard' SVX set up is that the rear cage sits on the cappings which would foul the hard top - so you'd need something bespoke.

Installation wise, Gumtrees have a good reputation as do Foleys
Post #189475 29th Nov 2012 11:50am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
farmer giles



Member Since: 09 Feb 2011
Location: worcestershire
Posts: 1299

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Cairns Blue
the original NAS softtop sounds like it would fit the bill. Safety Devices made them originally.
i understand the company was resurected a couple of years ago and all the original designs are obtainable

http://www.safetydevices.com/
Post #189504 29th Nov 2012 2:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
farmer giles



Member Since: 09 Feb 2011
Location: worcestershire
Posts: 1299

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Cairns Blue
Post #189505 29th Nov 2012 2:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Go Beyond



Member Since: 30 Jan 2012
Location: Headcorn, Kent
Posts: 6678

United Kingdom 
Looks like the same design as the P+P one - same problem with not being able to fit a hard top.

One 'tip', I was told that the soft top is really noisy flapping against the diagonals behind front seats that go back on the capping (I believe these are optional)
Post #189509 29th Nov 2012 2:35pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
farmer giles



Member Since: 09 Feb 2011
Location: worcestershire
Posts: 1299

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Cairns Blue
Go Beyond wrote:
Looks like the same design as the P+P one - same problem with not being able to fit a hard top.

One 'tip', I was told that the soft top is really noisy flapping against the diagonals behind front seats that go back on the capping (I believe these are optional)



Zip tying pipe lagging to the all the cage tubes tightens up the canvas fit and stops the flapping Thumbs Up
Post #189747 30th Nov 2012 9:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
pjh



Member Since: 22 Nov 2010
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 126

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Orkney Grey
Hi,

We have just had the Safety Device L148 cage fitted, which protects the passenger cell with an external (A pillar) and internal (B & C pillar). Really pleased - not too intrusive and expertly fitted by Foley's.

All the best,

Peter Defender 11MY USW
Post #192206 9th Dec 2012 10:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Just seen this for use on an ATV and wondered if an upscaled version would work on a defender - especially a soft top one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1YTaJqdUm4

http://www.atvlifeguards.com/

Post #342001 1st Jul 2014 7:27am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17351

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
It's been done, and apparently wasn't particularly successful.


Click image to enlarge



Picture from http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2014/06/story-fres-eighties/
Post #342004 1st Jul 2014 7:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Yes, it did remind me a little of those mine protection vehicles but this concept is completely different if you watch the videos and the ability for individual to survive if the cage rolls over you.

I'm also thinking that there must be a significant weight advantage over a steel cage.

I was surprised by the mounting to the quad itself and had imagined that this would be the real weak point of this design - but it appears to work very well.
Post #342007 1st Jul 2014 8:17am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
timbar



Member Since: 30 Jul 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 245

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Out of interest, how do you define "best"? I don't know what kind of specs are quoted for cages (have been thinking about one as the landy's our family car). Is it quoted in terms of accident at speed X, or of type Y, or survives an Elk test at 50MPH? 2009 110 XS Station Wagon
Post #342036 1st Jul 2014 10:39am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Not sure there is a definition of best but the minimum standards laid down for motorsport are a good starting point. These can be accessed easily from here:

http://www.safetydevices.com/motorsport/technical/

then it's just a case of how far you want to go, as an example door bars will provide extra protection but do you want the hassle of climbing over them everytime you get in and out.

If what you are looking at is non-compliant then understand what the non-compliance is and how this affects the protection you are looking for.

Seen a few supposedly substantial cages that were let down with basic design or installation flaws that would have seriously compromised them in a roll over.
Post #342040 1st Jul 2014 11:02am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Here's a new style for a Defender, sort of re-creating the split front screen again:
Post #343766 8th Jul 2014 5:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums