Home > Off Topic > Land Rover transporter crash A34 |
|
|
Green Machine Member Since: 19 Nov 2010 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 1226 |
Don't know if anyone else has come across this, I just noticed it on the AutoExpress website. Insurance company will have fun with that one!
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/land-rover/ra...rashes-a34 2005 Td5 | 90 Station Wagon | Tonga Green |
||
13th Oct 2012 2:32pm |
|
Killer90 Site Sponsor Member Since: 09 Oct 2011 Location: Hertfordshire Posts: 6478 |
luckily theres no defenders so its ok CSK Automotive
www.cskautomotive.co.uk Like us on Facebook - www.facebook.com/csklr Follow us on Instagram - @cskautomotive |
||
13th Oct 2012 2:47pm |
|
pom Member Since: 01 Jun 2010 Location: Worcester Posts: 1343 |
id be very surprised in the transport firm is liable for the load.
Pom |
||
13th Oct 2012 3:56pm |
|
Glynparry25 Member Since: 16 Feb 2009 Location: Miserable Midlands Posts: 3015 |
Sounds like someone was sleeping on the job!! Tacho time I would say.
No question about it, the transport firm is responsible for the load- always is, therefore LR will claim from them and they claim through the recovery insurance........ the bun fight then comes with whether the driver was within the law etc and then pay out or not. Whatever happens I wouldn't like to be in that driver's boots right now! Glyn Last edited by Glynparry25 on 13th Oct 2012 4:28pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
13th Oct 2012 4:22pm |
|
leeds Member Since: 28 Dec 2009 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 8582 |
I suppose it will depend on what broke/caused the transporter to break free from the recovery vehicle. IF the recovery point on the car transporter failed then can see the recovery firm insurance being off the hook. If it was anything supplied by the recovery firm or the way it was attached to the transporter by the recovery firm then it will probably be their insurance responsiblity. You can be assured that the insurance companies will do their best to wriggle out of it. Brendan |
||
13th Oct 2012 4:23pm |
|
Glynparry25 Member Since: 16 Feb 2009 Location: Miserable Midlands Posts: 3015 |
It all sounds a little bit Mickey Mouse to me.
If you have such a large (and expensive) load and the tractor unit breaks down, it is good practice to put the trailer onto another tractor unit to carry on its journey to the destination..... and then the recovery truck will just have a tractor to take to repair. Probably late at night and they couldn't be bothered so called recovery to do the whole thing and then worry about it in the morning. Glyn Last edited by Glynparry25 on 13th Oct 2012 4:32pm. Edited 1 time in total |
||
13th Oct 2012 4:28pm |
|
ken Member Since: 18 Aug 2009 Location: Banging Birds with my bitches !! Posts: 4328 |
It appears the Recovery driver used the lifting method for an artic on a wagon and drag causing the decks to interlock etc etc etc .
Its just one of the plausible theories And the logistics company is responsible for the load (To many dealings with EuroFleet & Inchcape Automotive ) |
||
13th Oct 2012 4:29pm |
|
pom Member Since: 01 Jun 2010 Location: Worcester Posts: 1343 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOB_(shipping) A former job shipping kit (military aircraft bits), the shipper aint allways responsible for the cost of the load. Good job as well, some of our shipments to the states cost more thant he plane flying them! Pom |
||
13th Oct 2012 4:52pm |
|
ken Member Since: 18 Aug 2009 Location: Banging Birds with my bitches !! Posts: 4328 |
Pom automotive logistics are different I know this as I worked in previous roles for carriers and I now also make claims for damage against the carrier directly in my current role.
Glyn it was a wagon and drag system their arnt to many artic units used by the main carriers also no tach hours apply if operating around the operators base (100 clicks) |
||
13th Oct 2012 7:29pm |
|
22900013A Member Since: 23 Dec 2010 Location: Oxfordshire Posts: 3150 |
Just for clarity, the transporter would come under tacho regs, the recovery vehicle would not. |
||
13th Oct 2012 10:08pm |
|
leeds Member Since: 28 Dec 2009 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 8582 |
Really? They are over 3.5 tonnes do it for hire and reward and tacho regulations apply They will require a tacho fitted, however should the tacho be in use? That is a different matter? Depends on distance from base and work history that day To quote the Association of Vehicle Recovery Operators
So it will be up to the Police/CPS etc to look at the whole situation to decide if tacho regs should apply or not. Since the Police/CPS has decided that charges of dangerous driving/insecure load etc be brought against the driver of the recovery truck then one can assume that there are grounds for a case to be brought to court. Brendan |
||
13th Oct 2012 10:46pm |
|
22900013A Member Since: 23 Dec 2010 Location: Oxfordshire Posts: 3150 |
I never suggested it wouldn't have one fitted! If it was operating for recovery (ie, not hire&reward) and within the 100km threshold (which isn't that far, I often get 150km from base within a couple of hours in a lorry) then it would not need the tacho to be in use.(I presume it would be switched to "out of scope".) As the quote says, in an emergency situation (eg motorway smash) the drivers hours regs are overridden anyway. Within 100KM only domestic rules apply which I think can just be recorded in a logbook. The tacho would still record what was happening (assuming its digi) so a record would still be made at least of when the vehicle was in motion and how far it went.
The tacho would have been checked at the scene by the police/VOSA/HATO (?) and as it is not mentioned I think we can safely take it that it was not considered to be in breech of any tacho regs. You can follow tacho regs to the letter and still be very tired, they are to do with competition in the haulage industry, not really safety, thats certainly my view having worked under the regs... |
||
14th Oct 2012 10:08am |
|
Sockpuppet Member Since: 17 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Posts: 479 |
Domestic tacho regs are not he same as the EC ones. Its been too long since I did my CPC to remember what exactly is different I just remember that they are Most of the drivers hours regs were introduced to make competition fair rather than to be of a safety consideration. Its to stop hauliers trying to do more with less and a way of making sure a lorry does roughly x amount of work per day. |
||
9th Jun 2013 4:02pm |
|
Sockpuppet Member Since: 17 Sep 2011 Location: Leicester Posts: 479 |
Read this after writing my post. Great minds see |
||
9th Jun 2013 4:04pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis