↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Td5 > Flywheels.... how much is too much?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
diesel_jim



Member Since: 13 Oct 2008
Location: hiding
Posts: 6124

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 110 Td5 SW Epsom Green
Flywheels.... how much is too much?
The Td5 dual mass flywheel... what is considered too much "slack" or free play between both pieces?

I've got one here with about 3mm movement, and about 40,000miles on it. Not ever had a brand new one in my hand to compare it to.
Post #129760 8th Mar 2012 2:25pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17581

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
I may be wrong (and if so I am sure that I will be corrected!) but I thought that there should be zero free play between the two parts. I have the old one of my Disco 2 in the garage and that had no relative free movement, but even so was junked for reasons of suspect wear and poor clutch perfomance (judder and snatch).

Mind you the new one that went in wasn't much better. it is still my intention one day to fit a Rakeway solid flywheel conversion and sort the clutch out once and for all.
Post #129776 8th Mar 2012 3:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chiefstoker



Member Since: 11 Oct 2010
Location: Weston-super-Mud
Posts: 897

England 2005 Defender 90 Td5 HT Zambezi Silver
I just had mine changed on the car, it needed changing. There was no visible freeplay by hand. Toyed with the idea of going solid flywheel but ended up with a dual mass again. If this happens in my Defender I'm not sure which way to go. Presumably a solid flywheel doesnt absorb the engine shock so much so is a more argricultural drive (if thats possible Laughing ) - but its a permanent fix yeah??

What are the comparable pros and cons of each type of flywheel? 2005 TD5 90 Hard Top

Beer 'n Sex 'n Chips 'n Gravy

Post #129839 8th Mar 2012 7:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
twopoint6khz



Member Since: 18 Aug 2011
Location: North Lakes
Posts: 654

United Kingdom 2005 Defender 110 Td5 CSW Java Black
There shouldn't be any free play in a DMF - the idea is it's two sprung masses connected together, with no slop.

In terms of replacing it with a single-mass unit, this obviously solves the problem of them breaking up but instead passes the vibration straight on to your transfer box / gearbox. Probably cheaper to stick with the DMF in the long run, and just change it whenever the clutch is changed or the gearbox is out.


Last edited by twopoint6khz on 8th Mar 2012 7:15pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #129841 8th Mar 2012 7:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
diesel_jim



Member Since: 13 Oct 2008
Location: hiding
Posts: 6124

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 110 Td5 SW Epsom Green
The bloke i got it off (Tractor mechanic, proper dealership jobbie) said there was no juddering from his 90 when he changed it (he had the leaking fuel regulator, so the clutch needed changing anyway. As his td5 is chipped he changed it to a solid flywheel whilst it was apart) said that there seemed to be no noticable difference in driving from the dual mass to the solid flywheel.

A couple of other people i've spoken too have said the same thing too.

As it's going to be going into my budget laning toy, i think i'll just wing it and see if it works... only gave £20 for it anyway! Mr. Green Thumbs Up
Post #129845 8th Mar 2012 7:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zinke



Member Since: 27 Jan 2009
Location: Scunthorpe
Posts: 670

United Kingdom 2003 Defender 90 Td5 HT Epsom Green
blackwolf wrote:
I may be wrong (and if so I am sure that I will be corrected!) but I thought that there should be zero free play between the two parts. I have the old one of my Disco 2 in the garage and that had no relative free movement, but even so was junked for reasons of suspect wear and poor clutch perfomance (judder and snatch).

Mind you the new one that went in wasn't much better. it is still my intention one day to fit a Rakeway solid flywheel conversion and sort the clutch out once and for all.


Sounds like it may be a engine or gearbox mount that needs replacing.
Post #130015 9th Mar 2012 10:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17581

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
With a reputable conversion (ie probably not the infamous "blue box" products) the only noticeable difference between the original set-up and a solid flywheel conversion will be the likelihood of marginally increased chatter in neutral with the engine running. There should be no real difference in the drive characterstics, except that the propensity of the thing to develop snatch and judder should be greatly reduced (always been an issue on my Disco) and also you won't need to replace the flywheel as well as the clutch every 150k miles.

The solid flywheel does of course necessitate the use of a sprung driven plate.

It is interesting to note that Landrover's dual mass experiences with the TD5 led them to revert to a single mass flywheel on the Puma.
Post #130048 9th Mar 2012 1:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nosnibod



Member Since: 15 Aug 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 370

United Kingdom 1998 Defender 110 300 Tdi SW Bronze Green
My experience with a solid flywheel lasted about a month before the extra high-frequency vibration and noise made me remove it. It really does shake the gearbox and engine a lot more and passes it through to the cabin.

Once a new dual-mass one was installed it was all nice and quiet again.

It was not a blue-box product either... Dave
Green Goddess - 1998 Defender 110 300tdi
Post #130118 9th Mar 2012 5:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
landy andy



Member Since: 15 Feb 2009
Location: Ware, Herts
Posts: 5799

2006 Defender 110 Td5 USW Zermatt Silver
I changed my DMF at 100 thou miles, as a precaution. Ther must have been 15-20mm of play, but still drove and felt fine.

So I would think one with 3mm of play will be fine for your toy Jamie


Andy
Post #130260 10th Mar 2012 8:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums